Questions grow over Labour MP Diane Johnson’s expenses

A few days ago Dizzy Thinks spotted an oddity in the expense claims of Hull North Labour MP Diana Johnson:

At the end of the detailed, albeit censored claims, provided on the Parliamentary website, is an invoice to the tune of £1,654 for “delivery of a leaflet in Hull North Constituency during September and October 2007”.

Looks legit doesn’t it? However there’s is an oddity about it. You see, there appears to be no such company as J W Shipley Distribution, either solvent or dissolved, listed on Companies House. An advanced search for all companies with “Shipley” also throws up nothing. Curious!

There is, however, an “independent” member of Humberside Police Authority called John Shipley who happens to be a local Labour Party activist in Hull, who also stood for the Labour Party in Hull during the 2002 elections.

I tried to contact Mr Shipley yesterday for confirmation that the invoice was from him but as yet have had no response.

So is a Labour MP claiming Parliamentary expenses to pay a Labour member to deliver leaflets? Well, although he may not have responded, I’ve been speaking to Liberal Democrats in Hull who confirm they personally saw Labour activist (and frequent election agent) John Shipley out delivering the leaflets in question.

Rum indeed. Investigations are, as they say, continuing…

Denis Healy is the Liberal Democrat candidate in Hull North. To find out how you can help him, see

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Would the Tax Inspector know whether this income was declared?

  • It really depends what they were delivering. if it was something paid for by communications allowance then I’d have thought it ok to claim for the delivery out of communications allowance as well (No idea if this is what was done). If it was a political leaflet then there is no justification for it to be delivered at taxpayers expense (not that I ever thought the communications allowance was justified but it was at least legal)

  • “to be no such company as J W Shipley Distribution, either solvent or dissolved, listed on Companies House”

    Could be the trading name of a sole trader. That, AIUI, wouldn’t require registration.

    There seems no difference between using a party member to distribute things (under the corrupt Comms Allowance) and using a commercial delivery company. Arguably you’d get a more thorough service and there’s not AIUI any requirement for competitive tender/Best Value etc. In any case the price seems consistent with other commercial services for a full constituency drop.

One Trackback

  • By Liberal Conspiracy » Dizzy in a tizzy over MP’s invoice on Thu 18th March 2010 at 3:39 pm.

    […] over MP’s invoice by Unity     March 18, 2010 at 3:39 pm From the file marked ‘are you fucking stupid or what?’… A few days ago Dizzy Thinks spotted an oddity in the expense claims of Hull North Labour MP […]

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Katharine Pindar
    Hi, Peter, I haven't heard about a 'lumpen proletariat' and I hadn't time to watch Panorama, but I take your point. You may recall that I personally am not enth...
  • David Evershed
    Boycott sport only after two way trade with China has been boycotted....
  • Peter Martin
    @ Katharine I didn't say that socialists possessed more "moral virtue". I'm not sure how that is a useful guide in any case. The socialist view of human n...
  • Peter Martin
    What's "it" ?...
  • Martin
    The UK Supreme Court has decided that the government has te authority to render a person stateless, in controvention of UN agreements and international, univers...
Thu 11th Mar 2021