Disability inclusion can’t wait – Why won’t Sadiq Khan act?

As the Labour Party prepares to make devastating cuts to disability support, the Mayor of London has remained conspicuously silent. While Labour leaders in other parts of the country have spoken out, Sadiq Khan has so far proved content to more or less toe the party line.

Yet with hundreds of thousands of disabled Londoners set to be hit by sweeping cuts to Personal Independence Payment, whatever his political calculations may be, there is still no excuse for Sadiq Khan failing to step up now as Mayor and use every lever at his disposal to engage and support disabled Londoners in response.

Disabled people are already feeling abandoned and scapegoated by Westminster. Now, more than ever, London’s Mayor should be charting a different course — not with vague pledges or sympathetic soundbites, but with meaningful, decisive action and engagement.

One demand has come up again and again from disability rights groups: appoint a dedicated Disability Champion in City Hall. Someone with lived experience, real authority, and the mandate to ensure disabled voices are not just heard occasionally but embedded in every stage of policymaking.

Over 1.2 million disabled Londoners face daily, systemic barriers in accessing their own city. They deserve leadership with focus and accountability. This isn’t a matter of symbolism. London has a Commissioner for Walking and Cycling. Why not one for disability equality?

That’s why, working with Inclusion London, I introduced a motion last September calling for exactly that. It passed unanimously – backed by every party in the London Assembly. Yet nine months later, the Mayor has done nothing whatsoever to implement it. He insists his Deputy Mayor for Social Justice is “good enough,” despite repeated feedback from campaigners that it isn’t.

Because all too often we still see a total failure across GLA bodies to include Disabled Londoners. Take the “Towards a New London Plan” consultation, a flagship planning strategy launched without accessible formats like Easy Read or British Sign Language versions, excluding both people with learning disabilities and deaf Londoners.

That’s not an oversight, it’s a structural failure rooted in a policymaking process that continues to exclude. And this isn’t just a disability issue. Accessible design benefits everyone — from elderly residents and parents with pushchairs to people recovering from injuries. After breaking both my legs in a car crash, I saw first hand how needlessly difficult London can be to navigate on crutches. A more accessible city is a better city for all.

So what’s the holdup?

Appointing a Disability Champion is straightforward, high-impact, and backed by public support, campaigners, and a unanimous Assembly vote. The Mayor has everything he needs – except the political will.

Worse still, the situation is regressing. When we reintroduced today in the Assembly, Labour Assembly Members who had supported it the first time chose to abstain. The needs of disabled people haven’t changed. But Labour’s commitment clearly has. Labour’s Assembly members are no more prepared to stand up to the Mayor, than the Mayor is prepared to stand up to a Labour government.

But as cuts to support make life even tougher for disabled Londoners, words without action will ring hollow. If Sadiq Khan is serious about building a fairer, more inclusive London, he should prove it – and he can start by appointing a dedicated Disability Equality Champion to put lived experience where it belongs: at the heart of City Hall.

* Hina Bokhari is the Liberal Democrat Leader on the London Assembly and the most prominent elected Muslim within the Liberal Democrats.  

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

One Comment

  • Mike Peters 6th Jun '25 - 4:00pm

    I have much sympathy for the argument behind having a Disability Champion with ‘lived experience’ but I have a concern about the proposal which I will outline below.

    I was recently a member of a short-life national advisory group, set up to provide advice to Ministers. At its first meeting, a discussion took place regarding expanding the membership to include someone with ‘lived experience’ of disability to ensure that the particular needs of those with disabilities would be voiced. Very quickly, it became apparent that the range of disabilities was so vast, and the needs of each so different, that a single person could not possibly have direct lived experience of most of them. For example, those with hearing difficulties, and those with mobility difficulties, have totally different needs to overcome the barriers they face in daily life. But appointing multiple people to ensure each group was represented would have made the group too large to function as intended.
    We decided not on a single representative to defend the interests and be the voice of those with a disabilities, but to instead consult for feedback from a large number of organisations at key stages in our process.
    Perhaps there is merit in adopting a similar approach in other areas of community planning or policy development?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Geoff Reid
    Two very basic questions for community politics practitioners with respect to Focus leaflets... Does this leaflet leave any space to say, however briefly, why w...
  • Tom Bailey
    Always, debate settles on the assumption that “... most voters don’t understand …” and it infuriates and entrenches the anger of voters who want less go...
  • Leonora Scipio
    Kira Collins makes an important point about trans men being able to get pregnancy protections but this needs to go further. Trans men also need access to women'...
  • Kira Collins
    “ Westminster would become a genuine federal parliament responsible for defence, foreign affairs, national security, macroeconomic stability, currency, and co...
  • Daniel Walker
    @Peter Martin It's not really about the EU. It's about Tom making a statement (implying that the process for electing the President of the European Commissi...