May 25th marked the sixth anniversary of the murder of George Floyd. His death sparked a global conversation on race that I, like many, hoped would result in serious, systemic change. After the platitudes around black squares, the meaning of taking the knee and the rather depressing debate that followed, it is time for a different debate. What change has actually occurred and how do we as Liberal Democrats play an effective part in delivering systemic and lasting progress?
Rob Blackie and Roderick Lynch powerfully outlined how poor our performance was in inner London in the recent elections and, if we’re honest, in wider metropolitan areas across England, Wales and Scotland. Our cities are the youngest, most diverse and liberal parts of our country. The multicultural, multiracial team in Brent scored our greatest success in London and are now the official opposition. Frankly as a Liberal Democrat Party, we’ve seen years of hard work by urban local parties be submerged by a Green wave powered by a strong national message and an active social media presence.
We can and we must get on the front foot if we want to make an impact in urban Britain. A fair, free and open society where we balance the fundamental values of liberty, equality and community can be addressed in 3 key issues:
- The Windrush Scandal. The failure to pay adequate compensation to the victims of a Home Office cock-up of epic proportions is a stain upon our nation. The service of the parents of these victims, many served in World War 2, guaranteed us the freedom we now enjoy, this should be a liberal call to arms. Who will defend the descendants of the guarantors of liberty not conscripted but volunteers. How do we ensure the Home Office truly learns the lessons and more importantly pays their elderly victims swiftly ?
- The Grenfell Disaster. This failure of local government, the regulatory environment, corporate interests and an inadequate approach to social housing has finally seen some criminal charges. Ensuring the plight of social housing tenants , the most vulnerable in society, is a priority that should appeal to the party that believes Equality is a powerful force for all.
- The future of the Notting Hill Carnival. The Carnival tradition in the Caribbean reflects a freedom the enslaved did not have. The ability to walk unmolested along the King’s highway. In fact, the enslaved had to be accompanied. When they were freed they celebrated in song and dance, a Christian rite. They brought this tradition to the UK as British Citizens in the 1950s. When faced with a resurgent populist right fomenting riots under Sir Oswald Mosley, these patriots, many of whom had fought fascism in the war, rebuffed their attacks with a Carnival. Strange how formerly Moseley-supporting media are still supporting the nativist, populist right. We should ensure it is financed for the long term as the world’s second largest Carnival and the truly national event that it is.
If we are serious about an urban revival and showing black voters that liberty, equality and community are universal liberal traits there are 3 issues our 72 MPs can pursue vigorously.
* John Armah is a member of City of Westminster Liberal Democrats and a digital transformation consultant based in London.



7 Comments
Surely evry political party refines its message according to the audience ? I find it hard to beleive that we dont talk about the subjects John mentions in urban constituencies/wards, but then I live in the leafy(ish) shires, so what do I know. It does seem like a bit of a missed open goal.
You can reassured that we will be and are focussing on these issues in City Hall – thanks John
Thank you Hina, I know the great work you and Gareth do on the London Assembly.
Chris , these messages about Windrush, Grenfell and Carnival are part of our national story. I want our party from.our leader down to show liberalism is relevant to all communities whether they are in Shires or Cities.
With 72 MPs we should be holding the government’s feet to the fire.
We have a mulitracial team in Brent, but what is the national party doing to get ethnic minorities elected to Parliament? Answer: the local parties decide. So we’re stuck in this catch-22 of having only one or two ethnic minority MPs out of 72, because we only try to win in areas where most of them don’t live, i.e. areas of the South that are not urban city centres.
Liberal values are a natural fit with BAME people in this country and our president, biggest donors and vital voices like John and Hina show the quality we can attract. However HQ and leadership do not make these issues a priority and do not recruit a diverse group of employees and MPs. This costs us votes and much of our right to claim to be liberal. Similar to our lip service with weak follow up on lgbt issues, we allow behaviors in the party that cast serious doubt on what we really stand for. It’s shameful.
Strongly agree.
The biggest problem to me appears to be that we’re scared to talk about liberal issues for fear of offending Tories in our Shires. Never used to be this way, and we still won affluent seats in SW London etc. We underestimate the values of people that vote for us which simply wouldn’t abandon us for taking moral and ethical stances on these issues and more, whilst at the same time opening us up to more people that greatly need representation…
I hope we can all cheer ourselves up by helping the fantastic Abdi Ahmed win in North Acton (LB Ealing) on June 25.