Ed’s Day – 6th June 2019

Ed’s day started with a good luck message to Beki Sellick, Lib Dem candidate in Peterborough:

Phillip Hammond has been complaining about the costs of fighting climate change. Ed says that we can’t afford not to:

Hammond might be trying to reclaim his crown as a fiscal hawk in the dying embers of May’s premiership, but this intervention is wrong headed and threatens our children’s future.

The cost of tackling the climate emergency is massively outweighed by the long term cost of not acting. The Chancellor has got his sums wrong.

The time to act is now. Just this week a new report concluded that 30,000 premature deaths could be avoided by stopping the burning of fossil fuels, proving a clean future is a healthier future.

With ambitious, stable, policies, Britain can have a competitive green economy, benefitting from the lower cost of hi-tech renewable energy.

Ed also welcomed comments form the Speaker that there would be no chance of Parliament being prorogued to force through a no-deal Brexit:

This is the right call from the Speaker and will be reassuring to people across the country who are rightly fearful of the possibility of a new Prime Minister determined to have us crash out with no-deal.

To have stopped our democratic Parliament from sitting and voting on issues of such huge importance to Britain’s future would’ve been a coup d’etat worthy of a tinpot dictatorship.

It’s also crucial that whoever is elected as Conservative leader and our new Prime Minister must come to the House immediately and explain what they intend to do to end the Brexit crisis, not just head straight off into their summer break.

And the day ended with a grilling by Kirsty Mark on Newsnight. Watch here

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Richard Underhill 7th Jun '19 - 11:13pm

    Ed was asked on tv whether he wanted to recruit 3 3 named Tiggers? He replied enthusiastically YES. Has he approached them? NO. Why not?
    He is being polite and sensitive. He said that changing parties is a big thing and doing it too often might not look good. He is right of course, but is it their decision?
    If so, do what any sales manager would tell sales staff to do. ASK FOR THE ORDER.
    We can remember when our party was shown in the polls as an asterisk, which was 3% or less with a margin of error of 3%. Their position is now worse, precisely 0%. Apart from the normal objective of wanting to be re-elected, what else can they want to do or achieve? Would there be safety in numbers as part of a larger group?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tim Rogers
    I agree with Jana above. Like most people I drive to work every day, a round trip of 34 miles. This is a major cost of living and ignoring it would be electoral...
  • Jana
    @Chloe As I understand it, the fact that under Westminster’s control Scotland has a fiscal deficit is actually an argument in favour of Scotland gaining the ...
  • Tim Rogers
    I cannot see it will make any difference either way. I sang hymns at school but it has not made me any more Christian than I am now....
  • Jana
    The more fuel you use, the more you are having to pay extra due to rising fuel prices. Since most of the cost of filling your car with fuel goes straight to the...
  • David Raw
    @ Tristan Ward. Sorry, Tristan, but basing your political philosophy on someone who died 229 years ago and was ambivalent about the slave trade is stretchin...