Fly me to the moon – reflections on the overview effect  

There is a moment, presumably, just before the engines ignite, when even the most committed astronaut thinks: what on earth am I doing? But then, if they take a moment to look out of the portal at what is happening on the surface of this ball of rock and water we call home – well, who can fault them for wanting to get as far away as possible?

Four astronauts left Earth yesterday, climbing aboard what is, in engineering terms, a controlled explosion and trusting it to hurl them away from the planet at speeds no living thing was designed to tolerate. You could call it brave or foolish. But consider the alternative. They could have stayed. They could have watched the climate data worsen quarter by quarter while the machinery of international response grinds and stalls. They could have followed the wars – the missiles falling on Ukrainian cities, the devastation in Gaza, death and destruction in Iran, chaos in the Straits of Hormuz and more – and felt that familiar mixture of horror and helplessness. They could have watched democracy, that fragile and still-young experiment, being stress-tested by autocrats in countries big and small.

Strapped to a rocket for a journey further from Earth than any human has ever gone before, suddenly, looks sensible.

I imagine that what they will find up there is not escape. Not safety. Something closer to its opposite.

From orbit, Earth looks like a thought someone had and then left out in the dark. A thin blue film stretched over rock and water, suspended in a universe that is almost entirely lethal. No atmosphere. No liquid water. No margin for error. The cosmos does not negotiate, does not hold summits, does not issue statements of concern. It simply is – vast, indifferent, and hostile to everything we are made of.

Astronauts who have seen this tend to describe the same thing. Not relief at the distance, but a kind of vertigo at the stakes. The overview effect, as it has come to be known, is the sudden, visceral understanding that borders are invisible from up there, that conflicts look like nothing against the curvature of a planet, and that the arguments consuming us – which party, which nation, which version of the future – are being conducted on a single, fragile, irreplaceable rock.

You cannot see a war from orbit. You cannot see a pipeline or a ballot box or a rising sea. You can only see how thin the blue line is. How little separates the world from the void.

It is, by all accounts, the most clarifying thing a human being can experience. The planet is worth the panic we feel about it. Democracy is worth defending because there is nowhere else to put it. The climate is worth every difficult, expensive, politically inconvenient decision, because that thin blue line is not decorative. That is the entire point.

They have ten days up there. I hope the view helps.

* Tom Reeve is a Liberal Democrat councillor in Kingston upon Thames

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

One Comment

  • I think many until they are presented with the reality, which space travellers experience, just can’t get their heads around the scale of the cosmos and how insignificant earth is (for many the numbers are just too large, even myself who probably spent too much time at uni. playing with the maths of infinity, struggles with the scale).

    Recently. I had the opportunity to see Helios, a 7 metre diameter artwork of the surface of the sun, at this scale the earth is the size of a tennis ball. We took our tennis ball and walked up the straight (ish) high street and at 750m turned round and held up our ball. With the real sun in the sky and the exhibition space way off in the distance (now hidden by buildings, trees and traffic) some sense of scale was gained.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Roland
    >”He’d voted in every general election since 1974, he said, and this was the first time he had ever voted for a winning candidate.” Well I could say t...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Jack, Starmer knew how to have good relations with the Trades Unions. Pity it didn't last. As soon as he was PM he was suspending his own MPs for doing wha...
  • Richard Dickson
    Building a brand does indeed involve consideration of WHAT (issues and policies). But more important for creating lasting memories and trust, and winning heads,...
  • Paul Reynolds
    Thanks very much Rob for setting out the issue of LD strategy, and the essential framework for the Strategy Review. Best wishes to the review team with a diffic...
  • Anne Williams
    Just a couple of comments. The messaging wasn't helpful. First of all, the Party tried to position itself as the opposition to Reform. When that became untenabl...