Follow the London count on London Elects

 

The interim figures for the London elections are being declared throughout the day on London Elects.  Counting is being carried out electronically.

In the contest for Mayor of London around 50% of the votes have been counted and verified. Progress in counting is being revealed in each of the large Assembly constituencies. The bar chart (which tantalisingly does not show the percentages – where did they get that idea from?) indicates that Sadiq Khan is substantially ahead of Zac Goldsmith on first preferences at the moment. Caroline Pidgeon is lying fourth just behind the Greens, but ahead of UKIP. Of course, this may change as the constituencies level up in their counting progress.

We are not expecting to win any of the Assembly constituency seats – each covers three or more Parliamentary constituencies – so our focus must be on the top-up party lists which will produce the London-wide members. Last time round we gained two seats from this, and we are hoping to gain two, possibly three, seats this time. At the moment, with slightly more than 50% verified ballots, the Greens, UKIP and Lib Dems are fighting for the three positions behind the two main parties. We are currently shown as fifth, but the three parties are too close to predict.

To add to the suspense, the progress in each of the contests will be frozen once 90% of the votes have been counted. We will then have to wait for the final result until it is formally announced from City Hall – this is expected at around 6pm, but could, of course, be delayed beyond that.

* Mary Reid is a contributing editor on Lib Dem Voice. She was a councillor in Kingston upon Thames, where she is still very active with the local party, and is the Hon President of Kingston Lib Dems.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Nonconformistradical 6th May '16 - 1:02pm

    “The bar chart (which tantalisingly does not show the percentages – where did they get that idea from?) indicates that Sadiq Khan is substantially ahead of Zac Goldsmith on first preferences at the moment.”
    What’s the chance of the Barnet voting omnishambles actually impacting the result?

  • It looks like a poor showing for the Lib Dems particularly in London and in Wales. Coming behind UKIP and the Greens is not a good set of results by any measure. The question is whether the policy message or the party brand is the problem, or simply lack of publicity.

  • If you want to see the %s, go to the LondonElects page you want to view,clear your browser address bar and type in

    javascript:$(‘.result span’).css(‘text-indent’, 0)

    (you may need to retype the first bit if you simply paste that link from here.)

  • David

    Thanks for the hack! I had to type it in rather than copy and paste.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • cim
    @Graham Jeffs "Some non LDs might like to kid themselves that our preamble mirrors what they stand for" Do you think that this might be a serious problem fo...
  • Matt (Bristol)
    This article is arguing for a version of kindness that is as idelogically charged and specified as a socialist party's notion of justice. It's nice to be nic...
  • Simon Robinson
    This is a very good article in terms of highlighting the dilemma facing any chancellor. There are few good ways to raise money, and endless demands to spend mor...
  • Tony Vickers
    I had expected Sir Vince to mention Land Value Tax as Honorary President of ALTER. Especially because the PM is a fan of the idea and there’s no “red line�...
  • David Blake
    I agree with much of what Richard Cripps says - and I've been a member for 54 years. If I wasn't already a member I'm not sure that what the party has become w...