Government consults over ending 28 days pre-charge detention and control orders

Following on from the welcome news of the review into ending Labour’s policy of detaining children for immigration purposes, yesterday a wide-ranging review into anti-terrorism measures was announced. (It’s a review that I of course have rather an interest in.)

Liberty’s take on the review is:

Help us end 28 day detention

Pre-charge detention refers to the length of time you can be locked up and questioned before you face a charge. In that time you may be unaware of what you are accused of, and unable to challenge the evidence against you. The current period for terror suspects is 28 days – the longest pre-charge detention limit in the western world. To see how 28 days measures up internationally see our image here.

Today the Home Secretary announced the Government’s intention to renew the 28 day period in July. Parliamentarians will have to approve this by the 25th July and if the Government doesn’t win this vote in Parliament, the period reverts to 14 days. Two weeks should be long enough to gather enough evidence for a charge. In fact no-one has actually been held for more than 14 days in the UK since the previous Government dropped its proposals for 42 days back in 2008. This policy should not be allowed to persist for another six months – ask your MP to vote against it in July.

Politicians vote on pre-charge detention some time in the next month. TAKE ACTION and make your voice heard.

Help us end control orders

Control orders allow for electronic tagging, home curfew and a ban on communicating with others all on the basis of suspicions from the Home Secretary. Years of indefinite punishment without police interview, charge or trial is not only unfair, it is unsafe for our communities. Potentially dangerous terrorists should face trial and prison, not be left in their living rooms.

Show the Government that the unsafe and unfair control regime must end. TAKE ACTION and sign our petition today.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMack 26th Feb - 2:24am
    There are some good ideas here, but I think that joining them together is probably important to seriously tackle this issue. Building more houses, regardless...
  • User AvatarYousuf Farah 26th Feb - 1:53am
    What you allude to in your article as a way to preserve the union whilst keeping dialogue with the SNP, is untenable. It would make...
  • User AvatarManfarang 26th Feb - 1:39am
    With the British economy failing under Johnson the number of British people seeking employment overseas is set to increase.
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 26th Feb - 1:01am
    But what is Unique to the Lib Dems about building more houses? Every party is in favour of it - the Conservatives because it will...
  • User AvatarPaul Holmes 26th Feb - 12:22am
    @TCO But private sector housing is more expensive. So a Council Tenant who is being financially hit by the Bedroom Tax is, according to you,...
  • User AvatarBen Rattigan 25th Feb - 11:15pm
    I cannot agree with this. Why? Mission Creep That's what happened with Labour plans and why I switched from Labour to LibDem. Govts can't help...