Heads up: Campbell & Clegg to launch Freedom Bill at 10am

Menzies Campbell and Nick Clegg will launch a “Freedom Bill” in Westminster this morning, calling for the repeal of 10 parliamentary acts passed since Labour came to power.

More

UPDATE: After that, Menzies Campbell and our shadow cabinet will gather for a strategy meeting in Henley-Upon-Thames from lunchtime Thursday to lunchtime Friday. According to Cowley Street “The party is preparing for a possible general election in October 2007”. I’ve heard there’s a good motivational speaker available in Henley…

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

10 Comments

  • Stephen Tall 9th Nov '06 - 10:35am

    Not sure what you find odd, Kevin – take a look at the list the Party’s published here: http://www.libdems.org.uk/campaigns/the-freedom-bill.html#topten

    Not populist. Just liberal.

  • Kevin – I think the answer is “a lot of thought has gone in to the list”. Which of the laws on the list would you rather keep?

  • Yes let´s have some populism.

    A pity that this is purely a civil liberties list though. Having a go at other types of regulation is 1. necessary 2. popular.

  • hywelmorgan 9th Nov '06 - 7:32pm

    Are the ten bills/bits of bills the ones posted above as 2 of those date from the Tories?

    You could repeal a lot more of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 which is a pretty dreadful piece of legislation regardless of what changes it actually makes.

    I can’t source the precise case but a judge described it in an offically reported judgement as “labyrinthine” and in places the “holy grail of rational interpretation is impossible to find”!

  • hywelmorgan 10th Nov '06 - 5:00pm

    There is also the possibility of repealing “non-existent” legislation. IE that which has received Royal Assent but not yet been brought into effect.

    There should also be provision whereby legislation passed is automatically repealed if not given a commencement date within say a year of Royal Assent – though that could be subject to a Parliamentary vote.

    The flipside of that would be for Parliament to be able to force the commencement of passed legislation. The incitement to religious hatred provisions have not yet received a commencement order which looks a bit like Government revenge for people amending it against their will. In the absence of a Government commencement order I don’t think there is any way for Parliament to force them to do so (except I suppose passing a new bill that it takes immediate effect)

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • theakes
    A new strategy/approach requires a new leader...
  • Kira Collins
    You use the phrase “fiscal federalism” and “financial autonomy” but have not used the phase I had hoped to see that is drawn out of both: fiscal autonom...
  • Peter Martin
    @Iain, "Without financial autonomy, political devolution is incomplete......." The problem, from a macroeconomic perspective, is that full finan...
  • Gordon Lishman
    When I wrote 5.1 in the Constitution, my over-riding intention was to ensure that the mass Party had some rights in relation to overall strategy, which was an i...
  • Roland
    @nick Baird - “ or whether it was just a terrible mistake caused by a lack of attention and professionalism by the officers involved.” I think this is th...