London Liberal Democrats – helping those with the smallest pockets get to work

Last week Brian Paddick and I launched a fairer fares package ahead of this year’s London Mayoral and Assembly elections.

Boris Johnson has been Mayor of London since 2008. In just four years he has increased the cheapest bus fare from 90p to £1.35 – and he had planned to raise fares even further until the Coalition Government stepped in and helped limit the rise. As well as bus fares, the cost of travelling on the Tube, the Docklands Light Railway, the Croydon Tramlink and the London Overground have all soared under Mr Johnson’s mayoralty.

Of course there is the argument that investment in public transport has to be paid for by someone, and surely passengers have to pay their fair share? There is of course an element of truth in that. Yet accepting that there is still a need for investment to continue in the tube network, does that let Mayor Johnson off the hook? Of course not. There are realistic alternatives to his fare policies.

Caroline Pidgeon and Brian Paddick campaigning in SuttonOne thing’s for certain – that realistic alternative is not being put forward by former Mayor Livingstone. His fares package which would cut fares by 7% for 18 months may seem attractive at a first glance. The simple truth is that the numbers do not add up – it is not affordable. The reality is that Mr Livingstone won’t be able to deliver this and many suspect he is just repeating his old tricks of the past.

Just look at his record. In 2000 Ken Livingstone stated in his manifesto: “I will freeze bus and tube fares in real terms for four years.”

What actually happened was bus and tube fare increased well above the rate of inflation in his four years as Mayor. The same thing happened in his second term, indeed take a look at these fare rises Ken Livingstone proposed for the year 2007. In this year alone the overall increase in bus fares was RPI plus 3.8 per cent. The rise in tube fares was RPI plus 1 per cent. Only when it came to his re-election year did fares miraculously suddenly reduce for bus passengers from £1 to 90p. Funny that!

It is clear from his track record that the former Mayor can not be trusted on affordable fares, and the current Mayor has hiked them up year on year. So where does that leave the Liberal Democrats?

Our position is quite simple. We won’t make unrealistic pledges. We think investment must be maintained in London’s transport network and we won’t put it at risk. Too much of the tube network is still creaking from decades of under investment.

Our plans are simple and about fairer fares. People should be able to get to work at a reasonable cost. When people on the lowest incomes find it difficult to afford their travel to work, then there is something seriously wrong with how a city is working. London Liberal Democrats are therefore advocating three simple policies.

A one hour bus ticket

It really is ridiculous that you can’t change from bus to bus in a short period of time without being charged several times. Passengers can change from one tube line to another without being charged again. Time limited bus tickets exist in cities across Europe. It really is time we caught up and helped people who rely on buses.

Early bird fares

London’s economy is reliant on an underpaid army of workers, from cleaners to security staff, who get to work before most people have even got out of bed. Discounted fares for people who complete their tube journeys early in the morning would greatly help London’s low paid. And, this would also help reduce rush hour congestion.

Part time travel cards

Some of the lowest paid work is carried out by part-time workers, the majority of whom are women. Yet most fares are structured around people who work a conventional five day week. We need to introduce a part time travelcard that provides far cheaper travel than is currently available, for people that only travel to work up to three days a week.

These three proposals, combined with tackling the outrage of Oyster overcharging, add to an effective package that we should be proud to campaign on over the coming weeks. They won’t cost the earth, but they will make a fundamental difference to people with the smallest pockets.

Fully costed

Most importantly, our fairer fares package is affordable. Through targeting waste, fare evasion and certain perks provided by TfL we are able to fund our plans, without impacting on the transport investment programme.

Our very specific and targeted measures that particularly help people on low incomes clearly exemplify how the Liberal Democrats are the only party in the May elections with fresh and innovative ideas for London.

* Caroline Pidgeon is the Liberal Democrat London Assembly Member and chair of the London Assembly Transport Committee

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in London and News.
Advert

10 Comments

  • LondonLiberal 18th Jan '12 - 1:26pm

    all excellent policies – well done caroline and the team for pushing them so hard and so consistently over the years.

    now let’s hope that london libdems don’t oppose a new airport in the thames estuary. it is badly needed, and will reduce congestion in heavily populated west london. over time it might even free up valuable land for housing in west london.

  • Chris Jeffery 24th Jan '12 - 11:32am

    In Motreal in 1967 they had a system wherby you could continue changing buses or metro for as long as you like in one direction , but had to pay again if you changed to the opposite direction. eg start going North, you could go West and East and North as much as you like but as soon as you go South a new fee was required.

  • Tony,

    Check this out:

    http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/can-ken-livingstone-deliver-a-fare-deal-for-london/9186

    The fact is that Ken Livingstone’s figures don’t add up .

    He has broken his promises in the past over fares and he will do so again given the chance.

    Mark

  • G Loosemore-Reppen 31st Jan '12 - 5:07pm

    In Berlin where I come from the 2 hours travel card covers all forms of ,public transport, it is cheap about 2 Euros , and you cannot return. There is no restriction as to when you travel – it is a standard fare and requires tickets to be validated with a time stamp. Caroline’s proposals are a step in the right direction.

  • Mr Jayantilal kotech 1st Feb '12 - 9:49am

    London transport, hotels and some site seeing ,all are very expencive for the common travellers to London and due to this problem”EXPENCIVE”, people are scared to come to london even on the 2012 olympic games.If this happens then all the effort of making money in olympic games time ,will be a very heavy stone on the head of the Londoners.It is time to revise the full transport charges , even Taxis and minicabs are expencive too. Half the time many buses are empty or half full.This is also effecting the other transport system on our roads.
    J Kotecha

  • Tina Wright 1st Feb '12 - 8:05pm

    I only work 2 days a week and a pass for part time workers like me would be a massive help.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Martin 9th Jul - 6:43am
    @ JoeB @ Michael BG Joes's simple example shows how we take $$ from the rich and give it to the poor. If Milton Friedman...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 9th Jul - 1:29am
    The sad scandal of the unprotected care homes in which so many have died before their natural time will not be put right by any...
  • User AvatarMike Jay 9th Jul - 12:26am
    The article in "The Australian" that Peter referred to is behind a paywall. However, the article is freely available at https://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2020/6/29/on-behalf-of-environmentalists-i-apologize-for-the-climate-scare
  • User AvatarMike Jay 8th Jul - 11:28pm
    I'm reminded of my undergraduate days back in the 1960s. The students' union repeatedly passed motions demanding that the US Government withdrew from the Vietnam...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 8th Jul - 11:01pm
    Michael BG, Torry is clear that a tax increases are only viable if the net disposable income of the great majority of taxpayers is increased...
  • User AvatarGraham Evans 8th Jul - 10:29pm
    It's all very well blaming the care sector for its shortcomings but you get what you pay for. Providing social care is extremely labour intensive,...