Last week Brian Paddick and I launched a fairer fares package ahead of this year’s London Mayoral and Assembly elections.
Boris Johnson has been Mayor of London since 2008. In just four years he has increased the cheapest bus fare from 90p to £1.35 – and he had planned to raise fares even further until the Coalition Government stepped in and helped limit the rise. As well as bus fares, the cost of travelling on the Tube, the Docklands Light Railway, the Croydon Tramlink and the London Overground have all soared under Mr Johnson’s mayoralty.
Of course there is the argument that investment in public transport has to be paid for by someone, and surely passengers have to pay their fair share? There is of course an element of truth in that. Yet accepting that there is still a need for investment to continue in the tube network, does that let Mayor Johnson off the hook? Of course not. There are realistic alternatives to his fare policies.
One thing’s for certain – that realistic alternative is not being put forward by former Mayor Livingstone. His fares package which would cut fares by 7% for 18 months may seem attractive at a first glance. The simple truth is that the numbers do not add up – it is not affordable. The reality is that Mr Livingstone won’t be able to deliver this and many suspect he is just repeating his old tricks of the past.
Just look at his record. In 2000 Ken Livingstone stated in his manifesto: “I will freeze bus and tube fares in real terms for four years.”
What actually happened was bus and tube fare increased well above the rate of inflation in his four years as Mayor. The same thing happened in his second term, indeed take a look at these fare rises Ken Livingstone proposed for the year 2007. In this year alone the overall increase in bus fares was RPI plus 3.8 per cent. The rise in tube fares was RPI plus 1 per cent. Only when it came to his re-election year did fares miraculously suddenly reduce for bus passengers from £1 to 90p. Funny that!
It is clear from his track record that the former Mayor can not be trusted on affordable fares, and the current Mayor has hiked them up year on year. So where does that leave the Liberal Democrats?
Our position is quite simple. We won’t make unrealistic pledges. We think investment must be maintained in London’s transport network and we won’t put it at risk. Too much of the tube network is still creaking from decades of under investment.
Our plans are simple and about fairer fares. People should be able to get to work at a reasonable cost. When people on the lowest incomes find it difficult to afford their travel to work, then there is something seriously wrong with how a city is working. London Liberal Democrats are therefore advocating three simple policies.
A one hour bus ticket
It really is ridiculous that you can’t change from bus to bus in a short period of time without being charged several times. Passengers can change from one tube line to another without being charged again. Time limited bus tickets exist in cities across Europe. It really is time we caught up and helped people who rely on buses.
Early bird fares
London’s economy is reliant on an underpaid army of workers, from cleaners to security staff, who get to work before most people have even got out of bed. Discounted fares for people who complete their tube journeys early in the morning would greatly help London’s low paid. And, this would also help reduce rush hour congestion.
Part time travel cards
Some of the lowest paid work is carried out by part-time workers, the majority of whom are women. Yet most fares are structured around people who work a conventional five day week. We need to introduce a part time travelcard that provides far cheaper travel than is currently available, for people that only travel to work up to three days a week.
These three proposals, combined with tackling the outrage of Oyster overcharging, add to an effective package that we should be proud to campaign on over the coming weeks. They won’t cost the earth, but they will make a fundamental difference to people with the smallest pockets.
Fully costed
Most importantly, our fairer fares package is affordable. Through targeting waste, fare evasion and certain perks provided by TfL we are able to fund our plans, without impacting on the transport investment programme.
Our very specific and targeted measures that particularly help people on low incomes clearly exemplify how the Liberal Democrats are the only party in the May elections with fresh and innovative ideas for London.
* Caroline Pidgeon is a Liberal Democrat London Assembly Member and Deputy Chair of the London Assembly Transport Committee
10 Comments
I don’t live in London, but I think a cheap pre-rush-hour fare is genius. One might hope it’ll inspire more companies to allow people to start and finish earlier to reduce their staff living costs, reducing congestion for all.
Cheap pre-rush hour fares seems to me to be a direct descendant of Victorian “workmen’s tickets” and a general good idea.
The one hour bus ticket also seems good idea. It would improve efficiency no end, because if your bus gets stuck in traffic, you could change to a less obstructed one. Would it be implemented on the Oyster card or some other way? (In Brno, you validate/time stamp any (paper- based) ticket from 10-minute up to a monthly when you first use it, on a machine in the bus/tram/trolleybus.)
all excellent policies – well done caroline and the team for pushing them so hard and so consistently over the years.
now let’s hope that london libdems don’t oppose a new airport in the thames estuary. it is badly needed, and will reduce congestion in heavily populated west london. over time it might even free up valuable land for housing in west london.
while the mitigating policies are all good, Its not clear whether our policy is to continue with BJ’s 2% rises above inflation, go with inflation or freeze them.
Also, Labour argues that the operating budget is separate from the investment budget and the cuts would be contained in the operating surplus. It would be good to know the real relationship between these two budgets.
In Motreal in 1967 they had a system wherby you could continue changing buses or metro for as long as you like in one direction , but had to pay again if you changed to the opposite direction. eg start going North, you could go West and East and North as much as you like but as soon as you go South a new fee was required.
Your ideas about transport pricing are good ones.
You might like to take into consideration the fact that transport charges in Japan are highest at peak travel times – on the principal that capacity is filled at those times. Cheap off-peak travel would encourage travel outside those hours. Of course, the fact that most people are travelling at peak times implies that they are employed, and can better afford to pay. Earlybird and hourly charges make excellent sense.
Tony,
Check this out:
http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/can-ken-livingstone-deliver-a-fare-deal-for-london/9186
The fact is that Ken Livingstone’s figures don’t add up .
He has broken his promises in the past over fares and he will do so again given the chance.
Mark
In Berlin where I come from the 2 hours travel card covers all forms of ,public transport, it is cheap about 2 Euros , and you cannot return. There is no restriction as to when you travel – it is a standard fare and requires tickets to be validated with a time stamp. Caroline’s proposals are a step in the right direction.
London transport, hotels and some site seeing ,all are very expencive for the common travellers to London and due to this problem”EXPENCIVE”, people are scared to come to london even on the 2012 olympic games.If this happens then all the effort of making money in olympic games time ,will be a very heavy stone on the head of the Londoners.It is time to revise the full transport charges , even Taxis and minicabs are expencive too. Half the time many buses are empty or half full.This is also effecting the other transport system on our roads.
J Kotecha
I only work 2 days a week and a pass for part time workers like me would be a massive help.