How were the Scottish elections run?

The Electoral Commission’s report into May’s Scottish elections is now out and broadly paints a positive picture of how the elections were administered.

As is often the case in such reports, it is the apparently obvious recommendations that highlight how something, somewhere took a rather unfortunate turn. In the case of this report, one such recommendation is tucked way unobtrusively in the middle of p.8:

Following any boundary reviews ROs and EROs must make thorough checks with the relevant Boundary Commission to ensure they are able to precisely identify the exact boundaries that are set out in legislation.

Indeed.

(700 people in Glasgow were sent poll cards telling them to vote in the wrong place.)

On the big issue in many people’s minds ahead of the elections, the report rightly brings good news. The 2007 Scottish elections were marked by controversy over the much higher proportion of rejected ballot papers than for previous Scottish Parliament elections.

This time, aided in part by the use of different ballot paperwork, the rejection rates fell right back down to levels last seen in 1999.

Looking to the future, the paper echoes the Electoral Commission report on the AV referendum when it comes to following up invalid postal votes and also promises a discussion paper on the thorny issue of when elections should be counted.

Scottish Parliament Elections Report – Electoral Commission

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBernard Aris 23rd Jan - 12:45pm
    Having instituted our public broadcasting (NOS and associations) by law, we also have maximised the salaries of the people appearing on screen by law (the...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 23rd Jan - 12:18pm
    James Belchamber - You say "If Liberalism does not demand that we prioritise diversity in our ranks then it is a dead ideology and we...
  • User AvatarFrank West 23rd Jan - 12:03pm
    I usually have either radio four or sky news on in the background, bbc news is a bit too soft for my liking. Given the...
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 23rd Jan - 12:00pm
    David Raw "Since then the party has developed into a neo-liberal home for accountants in Windsor and the Home Counties." John Roffey " Perhaps a...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 23rd Jan - 11:44am
    @Jo Wan "Whether you think they were good or bad, we have to own the Coalition years" That's a very important point, ownership of the...
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 23rd Jan - 11:43am
    Good point, Alex B. It may seem slightly odd that we have a system of selecting from what happens to come in, rather than commissioning...