Conservative proxy vote scandal widens

Interesting information to be found if you read the latest proxy votes list for Thursday’s Winchester Council elections. Since the news broke that a Conservative activist in Whiteley ward, John Hall, has been charged by the police with false registration information, false proxy voting application and making a false instrument, the council has issued the final list of proxy votes for Thursday’s elections.

Comparing this list with the previous list shows that six proxy votes in the Whiteley ward are no more. Of the six, two had John Hall down as the person to cast their vote. Another two had his wife, Sue Hall, and the last two had the wife of this year’s Conservative candidate down. It looks as if all six were taken out in suspicious circumstances, though of course we don’t yet know who knew what about what went on.

UPDATE: At the end of 2008, John Hall was convicted.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Chris – calm down! Calm down!

  • It puts in a different light something I heard a leading Winchester Conservative say to their then PPC : “Stick with me chum, and I’ll get you into Westminster…..or prison”!

  • Just for the record:

    Parties on Winchester City Council 2007-2008

    Con 29 Lib Dem 23 Lab 1 Ind 4 – Seats 57 Tories control by one seat

    Likely result without Whiteley proxy votes:

    Con 27 Lib Dem 25 Lab 1 Ind 4 – No overall control

  • On the doorstep in Whiteley I was told to; ‘forget my vote, all politicians are the same, I’m not voting for a set of crooks’.
    I took her to task, refusing to be put in the same band as a cheating Tory – little good done – she is turned off politics for a long time. This sort of behaviour does us all a disservice.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Paul, I accept you are agreeing to an extent. A limited extent. "There are ample legal mechanisms for ensuring that the financial settlement with t...
  • Paul WalterPaul Walter
    Peter: “We shouldn’t tolerate the term “Crown Dependency” being a synonym for “tax haven”.” I don’t know whether you are actually reading my ...
  • David Raw
    I rather thought the 3rd Duke and Duchess of Atholl sold the Isle of Man's feudal and sovereign rights in 1765 for £70,000 via the Isle of Man Purchase Act 176...
  • Roland
    @Peter Martin - I was responding to the curved ? ball Jeff throw out about Motability: If they can't charge VAT then its okay to reclaim the VAT rather than sim...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Simon, "Low earners on the IOM pay tax at 21% compared to – I think – 20% in the UK" I don't know where you get your IOM figure from. It is easy eno...