John Hutton was right: Gordon has been ‘a fucking disaster’. But who else was there?

At long last, what was widely known in Westminster Village circles has rippled out beyond: John Hutton was the cabinet minister who told the BBC’s political editor Nick Robinson in 2006 that Gordon Brown would be ‘a fucking disaster’ in the role of prime minister. Well done to BBC Radio 4’s Eddie Mair for wringing the admission from a reluctant Mr Hutton.

But it prompts two questions.

First, if this was Mr Hutton’s view – albeit one from which he has subsequently resiled, in public at any rate – why did he choose to become one of the 308 Labour MPs who signed Mr Brown’s leadership nomination papers, and in the process deprive the party of the contest it needed and deserved? It’s hard to escape the conclusion Mr Hutton acted out of a mixture of ambition and cowardice: the ambition to remain within the cabinet, the cowardice not to challenge Mr Brown himself or at least to support a putative challenger. For this reason, I find it hard to concur with the Spectator’s awarding of the title of New Labour hero to Mr Hutton.

The second question, though, is this: who else could Mr Hutton have supported if he had decided to put his money where his mouth is, and openly support a leadership contest? As it was, the only Labour MP who threw down the gauntlet was the left-wing Campaign Group candidate, John McDonnell: an honourable figure, but never a serious threat.

There were only two genuinely plausible alternatives at the time: David Miliband and John Reid. The very best that can be said of Mr Miliband’s leadersip credentials two years later is that the case is not proven. As for Dr Reid – who chose chairing Celtic over staying in the cabinet – I have a hunch that the Labour party would be in a stronger position today with him at its helm; but the UK would be a more fearful, authoritarian and dismal country.

This year has seen Gordon Brown deemed safe as leader of the Labour party – not because anybody thinks he’s much good at the job, but because no-one can agree that anyone else would be better. And if you look at today’s cabinet it’s hard to disagree. Yes, there are individuals who, with only a little stretch of the imagination, it’s possible to conceive of as leader of the opposition (Ed Miliband, James Purnell, Andy Burnham). But Prime Minister? Not so much.

This is the opposite problem to the one which kept Tony Blair safe as Prime Minister. There were occasions, most notably in 2004 and 2006, when Mr Blair might have been toppled: he wasn’t because the Labour cabinet knew Gordon Brown would take his place, and far too many of their number – the people who knew Mr Brown best – feared the consequences of his becoming ‘a fucking disaster’ of a Premier. Better to stick with Mr Blair, they reckoned, than subject themselves prematurely to the leadership of their ‘psychologically flawed’ colleague.

Labour sorely lacks big political figures today. When the history of the New Labour Government comes to be written – which will be sooner rather than later – the names which will figure large mostly pre-date Mr Brown’s tenure: Tony Blair, John Prescott, Robin Cook, Donald Dewar, David Blunkett, Charles Clarke, Claire Short, Derry Irvine, Mo Mowlam, John Reid; only Jack Straw, and latterly Peter Mandelson, straddle both eras.

Just look at the current cabinet: medicore and lacklustre doesn’t even begin to cover it. The reason Mr Brown has survived as Prime Minister is the reason Labour will be defeated next year.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

One Comment

One Trackback

  • By +++ Hoon and Hewitt call for Brown leadership ballot on Wed 6th January 2010 at 1:28 pm.

    […] a distraction from news about the snow. But it won’t happen. The timing’s wrong, and (as I’ve argued before), there really isn’t an obvious better candidate for Labour […]

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarChris Bowers 14th Dec - 10:29am
    Getting back to the original article for a second, it has a lot to commend it (as the early comments testify), and Nick Barlow's previous...
  • User AvatarMoggy 14th Dec - 10:27am
    Isn't this what Jo Grimmond understood all those years ago? We cannot make the breakthrough on our own. We have to become a catalyst around...
  • User AvatarJohn Critchley 14th Dec - 10:25am
    Totally agree with this proposal and hope that those at the top of the Party listen. There's little point in having wash-ups at a local...
  • User AvatarJames Pugh 14th Dec - 10:17am
    I'd like to echo the many comments on here lamenting the lunge towards identity politics that the Liberal Democrats have taken over the past decade....
  • User AvatarChris Bowers 14th Dec - 10:15am
    You're right, Brian, it does need to be discussed. I will say no more than that at present, because there are so many variables (including...
  • User AvatarHywel 14th Dec - 10:11am
    "Extend the libel laws to include anyone who uses social media. Make them financially responsible for the consequences of spreading fake news and hate speech."...
Tue 7th Jan 2020