Layla Moran: Government must step up its support for people who have to self-isolate

Over on the Torch website, Layla Moran explains why the Government needs to do more to support those asked to self isolate because they have been in contact with someone who has tested positive for Covid-19. She was prompted to do so after seeing members’ views on one of the many social media groups.

Employees who have to self-isolate under the scheme are currently only entitled to receive Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) of £95 a week. That is around five times less than the £460 net income a week received by a worker earning the maximum of £2,500 a month under the furlough scheme. And while the minimum isolation period is two weeks, some people may have to wait longer for their test or be asked to self-isolate several times. I’m therefore advocating for the Government to step up its financial support workers required to self-isolate under the coronavirus test and trace programme and ensure they receive the same level of support as furloughed employees.

This should be a no brainer. People should not be forced to suffer financial hardship for doing the right thing and self-isolating. If we don’t ensure employees are given proper support, people will face an impossible choice between paying their bills or putting their colleagues and communities at risk. Crucially, the short-term cost to the exchequer will be nothing compared to the long-term impact of failing to control another outbreak.

She argued that people should not be left out of pocket for doing the right thing.

You can read her whole article here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary in print, on air or online.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • cim
    There seems to be two separate things here and it's not entirely clear to me which is being proposed. 1) At least some parents would find it really useful if...
  • cim
    I think in the context of local/national elections it's pretty superfluous: if political parties don't take falling turnouts as a danger sign in their own right...
  • Jenny Barnes
    We apparently grow 52% of our required food on 6.1 million hectares of agricultural land. At a density of 50 houses per hectare, we could build 5 million houses...
  • Tony Vickers
    The mitigations and transitional relief measures for "income-poor, asset-rich" are the same as for FairerShare's PPT https://fairershare.org.uk/proportional-pro...
  • Adam
    "Of course, if the Party’s support for Welsh sovereignty within a federal UK included a belief that the Welsh Parliament should have the constitutional right ...