LDV readers say: big yes to Nick Clegg’s Trident U-turn

A week ago, Nick Clegg announced his decision to become the first mainstream party leader to declare openly his opposition to the UK renewing the Trident nuclear deterrent: “the world has changed, the facts have changed, you’ve got to change with them. So like-for-like replacement for Trident is just not right.”

We asked LDV readers to tell us what you thought of the Lib Dem leader’s change of heart (in the 2007 leadership campaign he clashed with Chris Huhne on the issue, arguing the UK should wait until the 2010 non-proliferation talks before deciding whether or not to renew). The question we posed was: Do you agree with Nick Clegg’s decision to rule out a like-for-like replacement of Trident?

Here’s what you told us:

  • Yes – Trident is the wrong deterrent and too expensive: 81% (245 votes)
  • No – we should defer a decision until after the 2010 talks: 9% (26)
  • No – we should commit now to renewing Trident: 10% (29)
  • Other: 1% (4)
    Total Votes: 304. Poll ran: 17th-22nd June 2009
  • So an overwhelming four-fifths of LDV readers who voted back Nick’s decision, suggesting he won’t have too much trouble overturning existing party policy when it’s put to the vote at the 2009 autumn conference.

    Read more by or more about or .
    This entry was posted in Voice polls.
    Advert

    8 Comments

    • A sensible move. The previous fudge was pointless and made the party look indecisive and confused. Unfortunately in politics it is rarely a good idea to say you don’t know.

    • There is a multilateral round of talks in 2010. We could put trident on the table and then get something in return from the Russians. Good politics, but bad policy to announce these things before that.

    • Herbert Brown 24th Jun '09 - 3:11pm

      “We could put trident on the table and then get something in return from the Russians.”

      What would be the practical benefit of “getting something in return from the Russians”?

    • Less nukes in the world.

    • Herbert Brown 24th Jun '09 - 5:03pm

      Well, yes, obviously. But does it really make any practical difference if the Russians reduce the size of their nuclear arsenal by a small percentage? Beyond saving the Russians some money, of course.

    • David Allen 24th Jun '09 - 5:37pm

      Gorbachev kick-started a major disarmament process and the end of the cold war by doing something rather like what Clegg seems to be proposing. That is, to commit to multilateral negotiation, to avoid wholesale unilateral disarmament, but nevertheless, to offer to take the first disarmament step forward. It broke the log-jam of distrust.

      Of course we are tiny by comparison, but not without influence on the US, as sadly Iraq demonstrated. As part of a process involving and encouraging Obama to get disarmament moving again, who knows what we might achieve?

    • Sir Humphrey 24th Jun '09 - 9:11pm

      But with Trident we could obliterate the whole of Eastern Europe!

    Post a Comment

    Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

    To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

    Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *
    Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

    Advert



    Recent Comments

    • John Leach
      Thanks for this contribution, Tom. Much appreciated....
    • Matthew Green
      Michael - I have always been sceptical about a supplementary measure taking into account environmental degradation, etc. It's methodology would be contentious a...
    • Martin
      "Instead of this nonsense, let’s actually have a LD conference" - Yes, yes, yes! In the midst of a self-induced economic crisis, there is eve...
    • Chris Moore
      There are oscillations in many features of the climate. The possible 60 year Arctic sea ice oscillation you mention doesn't contradict an anthropogenic effe...
    • Chris Moore
      Cancel Tory conference: what a ridiculous piece of rhetoric! On the reasoning here, you'd cancel nearly all conferences of the governing party. "There ar...