Stephen Tall

LDV readers say: Labour’s PBR will have virtually no effect

By | Tue 9th December 2008 - 6:27 pm

It’s all of a fortnight since Labour chancellor Alistair Darling unveiled the Government’s Pre-Budget Report. On the day it came out, LDV posed the following question for our readers: What do you think will be the overall impact of the Government’s Pre-Budget Report?

Here’s what you said:

* 7% (23 votes) – The Government’s financial stimulus is spot-on, and will get the economy moving again
* 41% (134) – Some of the Government’s measures are welcome, but overall the impact will be too small and the cost too great
* 49% (159) – The Government’s measures will have virtually no effect, and will result in recklessly high levels of borrowing
* 2% (7) – Don’t know
Total Votes: 323 Poll ran: 24th Nov – 7th Dec, 2008

Overall, then, almost-a-majority of you – 49% – labelled the Government’s PBR a failure, reckoning that the costs of it are way too high for the negligible benefits it might bring. However, this option was run a close second by the slightly kinder assessment that the PBR is good in parts, even if “the impact will be too small and the cost too great”. A slender 7% of you were willing to stick up for the PBR, and also believe its effects will be as beneficial as Labour proclaims.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News and Voice polls.
Advert

3 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Meral Hussein-Ece
    A good article which highlights the problem with conference. It’s increasingly unaffordable for many, who are excluded from policy development. John is righ...
  • Chris Caswill
    John Kelly makes two important points. Party Conference is clearly over managed, and membership democracy is the regrettable victim. Time for a change. Second...
  • sean worrell
    I completely agree. The issue isn’t simply whether every member technically has the same vote. It’s whether everyone has a realistic opportunity to particip...
  • Peter Davies
    "we might as well go all-in and rejoin the EU" Everyone who opposes this already believes this is our position. Let's give those who agree with us a clear m...
  • David Warren
    This and Roderick Lynch's recent article regarding federal conference are music to my ears. We pride ourselves on being a party where members decide policy b...