Online exhibition: Three Key Elections of the Twentieth Century

Lib Dem Voice readers might like to know that a new exhibition, Turning Points: Three Key Elections of the Twentieth Century, was opened by Baroness (Betty) Boothroyd in Parliament last night. The bad news is it’s not open to the public. The good news is that it’s all available to view online at www.turningpointsexhibition.info. Here’s the teaser for it:

The 1906, 1945 and 1979 general elections are arguably the most significant elections of the 20th century. Each ushered in a distinct new era in British politics, the impact of which still resounds to the present day.

1906 brought in a reforming Liberal government, which introduced the foundations of the Welfare State which, in turn, was developed more fully by the Labour Government after its landslide election in 1945. The 1979 election saw a Conservative government equally determined on reform and ending the ‘consensus politics’ of the post-war era whereby both main parties had had broadly similar policies towards the mixed economy, welfare state, trade unions and unemployment. …

The aim of the exhibition is to promote awareness of the political party archives among Members of Parliament by featuring a selection of manuscripts from the archives of the three main parties. Focusing on the 1906, 1945 and 1979 elections which each ushered in a distinct new era in British politics and brought in, respectively, a Liberal, Labour and Conservative Government, it demonstrates the rich but under-used resource for the study of British political history.

(Declaration of interest: I work for the Bodleian Library, home to one of the featured archives. Ironically for me, it’s the Conservative Party Archive. The Liberal Party and Liberal Democrat archives are held at the LSE.)

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Interesting that 1997 isn’t listed as a turning point – does this mean we can agree the last vestiges of the wave of hope Blair originally embodied has finally been dissipated by the current economic mess?

    I’d like to be able to predict that the next change of government will mark a significant turning point (especially if it comes a few months after Obama’s entry into the White House). A hung-parliament in 2009 (with a temprorary cross-party National government – Vince Cable as Chancellor of the Exchequer?) would be a big change, but we will have to wait and see on that.

  • Different Duncan 9th Dec '08 - 6:48pm

    anyone else read the URL as turning point sex hibition?

  • Thomas Hemsley 9th Dec '08 - 7:17pm

    ” Ironically for me, it’s the Conservative Party Archive.”

    Mole! 😛

    1997 wasn’t, in my opinion, a turning point other than the fact that the Tories were catapulted to obscurity. In that respect, it was more like 1983, than 1906, 1945 or 1979.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Geoffrey Payne
    I would have expected that you just need to ask Ed and Josh. I am assuming you have and not got a reponse. In that case it is alarming that you had to post her...
  • Alex Macfie
    @Graham Evans: The party wasn't in any electoral difficulties when CK was deposed. We were still winning elections; we even won a Parliamentary by-election duri...
  • Ruth Bright
    Hywel - bless!!...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Might a well explained, transparent tax system which does not significantly favour the wealthy and the rentiers, get to the real root of this matter? Might t...
  • Sarah
    The triple lock is unsustainable but that doesn’t mean the richest generation to ever live will be poor. It means pensioners who need help and don’t have as...