LDVideo: Vince Cable’s best bits from Ask The Chancellors

Our place to talk – an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.

The most-read independent website by and for Lib Dem supporters. Not paid for by trade unions or millionaires.

Advert

LDVideo: Vince Cable’s best bits from Ask The Chancellors

By Helen Duffett | Tue 30th March 2010 - 4:45 pm

Follow @helenduffett

Welcome to this latest LDVideo instalment, highlighting video clips from last night’s Ask The Chancellors debate on Channel 4.

Vince not only speaks the most sense but provokes the best reaction from the audience, getting more rounds of applause and even warm laughter.

On bank bonuses:

available on YouTube here.

I warned of the recession:

Available on YouTube here.

George Osborne’s savings are “fictional”:

Available on YouTube here.

Inheritance tax: what should be done?

Available on YouTube here.

“Pinstripe Scargills”

Available on YouTube here.

If you’d like to watch the whole show, it’s available online for the next 29 days over at 4oD.

Read more by Helen Duffett or more about alistair darling, channel 4, george osborne, vince cable or YouTube.
This entry was posted in News.

Advert

One Comment

Max Atkinson 30th Mar '10 - 5:23pm

Having sometimes been criticised for placing too much emphasis on applause as a measure of the effectiveness of political speeches, I’m greatly reassured by the attention paid by this post (and quite a few others I’ve seen) to the amount Vince Cable was applauded during the debate.

If this is a trailer to the televised leaders’ debates during the election, it’s going tol be interesting to see how they plan to enforce the ridiculous ‘no applause’ rule they’ve all agreed on. It didn’t work during the 1984 presidential debates between Reagan and Mondale, and I’m amazed the broadcasters think it will work here – for more on which, see http://su.pr/2V8KQp

Meanwhile, LibDems may like to ponder the fact that some of the applause Vince received was won by blatant ‘yah-boo’ politics, of which many in the party have traditionally taken a rather dim view, but which I’ve always recommended as an important weapon in the rhetorical kit bag. Vince has also used it before, as did David Steel as far back as the 1979 general election – examples of which can be inspected here http://su.pr/2PYqCY

One Trackback

By Tories cry “foul” at Lib Dems’ fair hearing on Wed 31st March 2010 at 5:22 pm.

[…] happens when a Liberal Democrat does get an equal chance? Vince connected well with the audience as these clips show, as well as getting very favourable coverage in the media […]

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Comment

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Most Read

Op-eds

Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
Observations of an Expat: Gaza Sceptic (Tom Arms)
The Social Liberal Forum, a strategy for relevant liberalism (Roger Hayes and John Shreeve)
We need to send a message “We hear you” on illegal immigration (Oliver Jacques)
Why Andy Burnham would be foolish to turn his back on London (Sarah Olney)

Advert

Recent Comments

Big Tall Tim
Thank you Kevin. Theakes - That is correct, so good news for our team in the target constituency of Hamble Valley....
Andy Daer
I think we all know that if it’s true that Hamas has agreed to disarm (which would be a clever move by them) Israel will not like it, and will try to prevent ...
Tristan Ward
"A true national liberal party I do not see how a "true national liberal party" can be solely based on social liberalism - such a party can be only half a li...
Stephen Robinson
We may wish to have a clear and distinctive policy on the subject. But we shouldn't proactively be talking about it. For the same reason as we were wrong to get...
Tom Arms
point taken...