Leadership News: The Tweets

We thought we’d take an occasional look through the Twitter feeds of leadership hopefuls Norman Lamb and Tim Farron. Today they are united, marching for human rights.

Norman saw one omission from the Queen’s Speech:

While Tim has an important reminder:

Both men would stand up for rights of 16 and 17 year olds:

But that begs the question – would they vote against bill if it didn’t allow these young people their say? We’ll ask.

On the lighter side, Norman has his tat sorted:

While Tim has to apologise to Daisy Benson:

We’ll be keeping an eye on their social media over the next six weeks. Watch this space.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • paul barker
    Palestine Action have never claimed to be a Protest group, they are a Direct Action campaign, aiming to actually stop Arms firms supplying Israel. I don't suppo...
  • Laurence Mann
    Just to say that you've absolutely hit the nail on the head with your comments about the rushed ban on social media use. However you have omitted one key ar...
  • Stefano Brunesci
    A very similar argument to that set forth by Phillip Inman in the Guardian the other day. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jun/13/labour-introduce-w...
  • Robert Doyle
    Just to correct Paul Barker, Lambeth is *not* a coalition or joint administration, there is a minority Green leadership. The Liberal Democrat group on Lambe...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Nonconformistradical. So you're saying that the correct sentence was imposed albeit for the wrong reasons. You could be right about the sentence. But we...