Lib Dem tax policy: the media’s starting to listen, so now will the public get to hear about it?

Earlier today, Lib Dem Voice published this extract from Nick Clegg’s speech to the Royal Commonwealth Society summarising the Lib Dems’ policy of tax cuts for low- and middle-income households:

Real tax cuts – big, permanent and fair – for the people who need them. Funded by making the wealthy pay their fair share, ending the special exemptions and loopholes they’ve profited from for so long. Liberal Democrats would reduce basic rate income tax by 4p in the pound. That would give nearly £1000 back to a worker on £30,000 a year. Funded by four changes.

One: ending upper rate pensions relief – so the wealthy don’t get extra pension help from the tax man. Two: taxing capital gains at the same rates as income. So bankers and executives can’t get away with paying 18% tax while their cleaners pay 31%. Three: green taxes to protect our environment. And four: tackling the scandal of corporate tax avoidance – a subject I’ll be addressing in a speech tomorrow.

This is an opportunity for a new, fair tax system.

The section has also been reproduced by the Spectator’s Coffee House blog, with Peter Hoskin adding the following approving commentary:

there’s a directness to their tax-cutting message that’s quite admirable. Let’s lower taxes for low and middle-income earners and let’s do it without imposing a debt burden on their children, they say – and rightly so. What’s more, they’ve been pushing this line for long enough that – rightly or wrongly – it doesn’t smack of opportunistic posturing as the recession bites. What Clegg is saying tonight isn’t substantially different from what Ming Campbell proposed in July last year. Now how’s that for consistency, Mr Brown?

Now you might not think it’s all that surprising that the right-wing Spectator should be applauding tax-cuts, regardless of which party is proposing them. What is surprising, though, is to see the consistency of the Lib Dems’ message applauded by the Spectator. Maybe the media is beginning to wake up to the fact that there’s more to the Lib Dems’ response to the economic downturn than Vince Cable’s legendary sagacity: the wider membership, let’s not forget, has endorsed the party’s economic approach at its conferences.

It’s interesting to note that this isn’t simply a case of the Lib Dems feeling hard done by when it comes to media reporting: politicians and commentators across the political spectrum also think the media is principally responsible for the party’s failure to benefit in the polls, according to the findings of PoliticsHome’s PH100 panel of ‘experts and insiders’. As Andrew Rawnsley writes:

Here’s a conundrum that has to be troubling Nick Clegg and his MPs. The Lib Dems were ahead of the game on tax reductions to deal with the economic crisis, beating Labour and the Tories to it by advocating a 4p cut in income tax. Vince Cable is the most popular politician in Britain and, according to our tracker, the most highly rated by other politicians. The Lib Dems didn’t get entangled in the Deripaska Affair, unlike Peter Mandelson and George Osborne. So why we ask, as they must ask themselves, are they not doing better in the opinion polls? …

The media is the culprit, according to roughly a third of our insiders and experts on the PHI100. Thirty four per cent of the panel reckon the Lib Dems are suffering because the media hasn’t paid them as much attention as it does to Labour and the Tories. This explanation is especially popular with Lib Dem panellists. Many of the media panellists also think this is the reason as do quite a lot of the politicians on the panel.

The least popular explanation, incidentally, was that it was the party’s own fault: just 14% of the PH100 believed the party’s failure to benefit was because the leadership had failed to get its message across. Almost one-quarter (23%) – and their number included me – reckoned it was because times of crisis tend to benefit the Government at the expense of opposition parties.

All of which strikes me as interesting, and (without being complacent) reassuring. Lib Dems, especially those of us who inhabit the blogosphere, are prone to be ultra-critical, leaping on the mistakes we perceive the party leadership is making, more rarely praising the stand-out achievements with which we agree.

And there’s been a fair degree of self-flagellation in recent weeks that the Lib Dem poll ratings have dropped a notch or two during the current economic crisis: ‘Vince is seen as a pundit, not a Lib Dem’, ‘Nick’s not been clear enough’ etc.

I’m not suggesting there are no criticisms to be made. But sometimes, y’know, the party doesn’t get the immediate credit it deserves for being ahead of the curve, and that’s not always the fault of any individual within the party. Anti-Lib Dem media bias and external factors beyond our control are at least as likely reasons.

And if the message is getting through even to the media that they’ve not given the Lib Dems a fair crack of the whip, perhaps there’s now more of a chance that the public will get to hear the party’s tax proposals. And the more they hear from us, the more likely it is they’ll vote for us.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds and Polls.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Yes – as i’ve said before – you have to communicate with those that would NEVER vote for you before you connect to those that might.

    It’s a great start!

  • Different Duncan 12th Nov '08 - 4:42pm

    I like that Nick Clegg just keeps hammering the same point over and over again when he is on the media. It is a simple policy that will slowly be absorbed by the public. It must get tedious for him, but it is what is needed.

    Vince Cable’s non-political, accurate punditry has won him huge respect. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. The people who don’t know that Vince is a Lib Dem probably aren’t the people who pay much attention to politics, and therefore aren’t his target audience.

  • Hooray – is all I can say!

    Having been a tiny voice of self-flagellation on LDV for a while I’m really happy to see that Nick Clegg is absorbing the feedback in a positive way – judged by today’s performance at PMQ’s and in recent soundbites of him on TV.

    These are opportunities to play conductor to the media and push them in directions which explain our political message and argument quickly, concisely and comprehensively – so the following line is a real positive as far as I’m concerned “Real tax cuts – big, permanent and fair – for the people who need them. Funded by making the wealthy pay their fair share, ending the special exemptions and loopholes they’ve profited from for so long.”

    The words ‘big, permanent and fair’ resonate at an instinctual level.

    This opens up interest in what else we have to say – and we’ve consistently shown that when the public have the opportunity to hear our voices they like what we say.

    Way to go Nick!

  • David Heigham 12th Nov '08 - 5:43pm

    There is a well proven principle in commercial marketing “When the professionals are getting tired of hearing the message, the public are just beginning to listen.” Let’s keep plugging.

    For us in the blogsphere (“We blogsphericals”?) There are three sides of the message to push:

    The LibDems have thought out why and how to do tax cuts. The others have not.

    The LibDems tax policy is seriously green.

    The LibDems got there first – yet again.

  • From my experience of working in local parties, my advice is simple.

    When writing your ward Focus. Seriously THINK about whether you REALLY need that story about Britain in Bloom or the third in an occasional series about the Regional Spatial Strategy – or whether you could, instead feature a national story about Nick Clegg, Vince Cable and giving your constituents a nice big tax cut.

    It’s tragically unglamorous but THAT’s how we will get the message across!

  • Vince Cable said in a talk at Reading University last week that local income tax would be a bad idea right now – from the local paper:

    Mr Cable said: “It’s a valid point, why would we in these circumstances want to replace a tax on property with local income tax – the honest answer is that under the current circumstances that would not be the right way to proceed, and we may well confirm that. Introducing local income tax at the present time would not be helpful.”

    Hadn’t realised that before.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 23rd Feb - 8:27pm
    Yes, expats, we do need outrage, at what the poorest and unluckiest people of this country are suffering, and sadly are likely to suffer more...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 23rd Feb - 7:37pm
    Much as I enjoy trying to categorise political thinking, Tony, I don't see many politicians in either the Tory or the Labour party actually fitting...
  • User AvatarJohn 23rd Feb - 7:07pm
    Little englanders have been forecasting the end of the EU since early EEC days of 6 countries in the early 70's
  • User AvatarJonathan Coulter 23rd Feb - 6:56pm
    @Lorenzo Chirin: "I am fed up with people continuously saying antisemitic claims are made up, fake or smeared". Lorenzo, to get to the point, please...
  • User AvatarTony Venezia 23rd Feb - 6:28pm
    'The horrible truth is that there are people, together with the Government of Israel who are using false accusations of AS, alongside the IHRA definition,...
  • User AvatarTony Venezia 23rd Feb - 6:24pm
    Not much here for social democrats.