Lib Dems react to King’s Speech

Ed Davey has been on Sky News talking about the King’s Speech.  He called for a General Election to put a Government that has run out of ideas out of its misery.

In the debate in the Commons yesterday, Ed said:

May I, like others, start by paying tribute to His Majesty for delivering his first King’s Speech? It was clearly an historic moment, but for our King it must have been an emotional one. He made reference to his late mother, our late, amazing Queen, and many of us listening to him felt that he delivered that speech with grace and aplomb, and we are very grateful to him.

May I also pay tribute to the right hon. Member for Scarborough and Whitby (Sir Robert Goodwill) and the hon. Member for Stroud (Siobhan Baillie) for their speeches? I have always rather admired the right hon. Gentleman, for many reasons. His speech today was extremely entertaining, but I have always liked the fact that he, like many on our Benches, opposed the third runway at Heathrow and that he was a constructive, if unfashionable, Conservative in his views on a constructive relationship with our European partners. But perhaps what makes him more at home with the current Government is his romantic enthusiasm for the steam engine, as we have heard: more noise than substance and going nowhere in the modern world.

My mother-in-law, an expert beekeeper and honey producer—and the swarm officer for North Dorset, no less—would join the seconder of today’s motion in congratulating Stroud on being the world’s first bee guardian town. I am sure that Stroud has a real buzz about it, but the House will be pleased to hear that I do not intend to drone on and on. Given your strictures at the beginning of this debate, Mr Speaker, I should like to clarify that I was not referring to any other Members in talking about droning on.

Today’s Gracious Speech is overshadowed by horrifying events around the world, with the monstrous terrorist attacks by Hamas on Israel one month ago—more than 1,400 Israelis were slaughtered and hundreds were taken hostage, and they are in our thoughts today—and now the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza. Innocent Palestinians have been cut off from food, water and medicine. Their homes have been destroyed, and more than 10,000 have been killed.

We also have war on our continent, as the brave Ukrainian people continue to resist Vladimir Putin’s war machine. At times of global crisis such as this, the UK can be a force for good, when it stands tall in the world. But the British voice can be at its strongest only when we have a Government that are strong and united. I am afraid that that is sadly lacking now.

As the Gracious Speech shows, we do not even have a Government strong and united enough to take real action here on the challenges that people face at home. These are very tough times for the British people. They are working hard, showing remarkable decency and strength, but people are finding it harder and harder just to make ends meet. Instead of helping, what have this out-of-touch Conservative Government done in this King’s Speech and over the past few years? They have put up taxes, energy bills and mortgage payments. They have been adding to the pain, instead of soothing it.

Let us look just at energy, where today the Government could have brought forward plans to ensure Britain’s energy security and to bring down energy prices, with sustainable energy price cuts, for the long term. The Government could have announced plans to insulate homes to cut people’s energy bills and to invest properly in cheap, clean, renewable energy for the future. Instead, the Conservatives are choosing, once again, to shackle us to the expensive, dirty fossil fuels of the past.

Today’s Speech is yet more proof that this Government simply do not care. Just last week, the covid inquiry heard that during the pandemic the Government thought that older people should just “accept their fate”. That callous approach reveals an attitude that stretches far beyond the pandemic. By failing to address the cost of living crisis, the NHS and care crisis, the sewage crisis and many other crises like them, this King’s Speech, in essence, tells families and pensioners struggling to get by to “accept their fate”. This Government tell the pensioner, waiting weeks to see her GP, to accept her fate, and the cancer patient, waiting months just to start treatment, to accept his fate. They tell communities who are seeing their rivers polluted and their countryside destroyed to accept their fate. They tell the British people, fed up with being taken for granted by an out-of-touch Government, to accept their fate.

However, whatever this Government might want, the people of our great country—the British people—have never been ones to sit back quietly and accept their fate.They will not accept a Government who are so weak and divided that they cannot tackle the country’s challenges. They will not accept a Conservative party that is out of touch and out of ideas; they will kick it out of office. They will get that chance soon. No matter how long the Prime Minister delays it, an election is coming, so the British people do not have to accept the miserable fate of this tired Conservative Government. They can choose a better future and I believe they will.

Christine Jardine said that all the Conservatives had to offer was cheap gimmicks:

Rishi Sunak’s Conservative party are more focused on demonising the desperate than they are on tackling any of the actual problems that the country faced.

A serious government would be setting out plans to tackle long waits for healthcare, the cost-of-living crisis and local rivers ruined by sewage.

Instead all Rishi Sunak had to offer was cheap gimmicks and reheated policies.

Stick a fork in the Conservative party, they’re done.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Alex Macfie 8th Nov '23 - 9:56am

    Queen’s Speech?

  • But Ed’s performance on R4 this morning was poor, he came across as weak (although he isn’t alone in this) by being mealy mouthed and not calling a ceasefire a ceasefire and clearly saying what Israel is doing to the Palestinian people goes way beyond self defence and will simply perpetuate the cycle of violence; there won’t be peace between the Mediterranean Sea and the river Jordan until the children stop squabbling…

  • I did not see the interview but if he spent the whole interview talking about Gaza that was a waste. Plenty in yesterday’s king’s speech to go on like drilling for oil exploration. However he is right on a ceasefire since Hamas have said they oppose a ceasefire and would not observe one.

  • Nigel Jones 9th Nov '23 - 9:42am

    I agree with Roland and John Waller that Ed needs to call for a ceasefire. That Hamas and Netanyahu will not agree is no excuse for not saying what should happen. We need to take a principled stand and with others that will set the scene for any subsequent events. I am very unhappy with Ed over this, including his unwillingness to give explicit support for what Gutterez, of the UN has been saying. We are being seen to support others in the UK who show more sympathy with Israel’s government than with the Palestinian people and that is wrong.

  • I suggest that we need urgently to say what we should do in the short term, and then in the longer term, to contribute to a peaceful Israel/Palestine. In fact this is something we should do for other conflicts in our world.
    The question that needs to be addressed is what could this country actually do to help the situation.

  • @Tim Rogers “ Plenty in yesterday’s king’s speech to go on like drilling for oil exploration.”
    This was an interesting one, it is a blatant attempt to make the politician life difficult for the next government, if the Conservatives are in opposition.
    It was interesting when BBC R4 questioned Andrea Leadsom on the reason for legislation being necessary for something that is already within the remit of the relevant minister, she was unable to provide a convincing reason.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Katharine Pindar
    A splendidly vigorous and broad-ranging speech from Ed which we hope will be well reported. It is to be hoped also that Federal Policy Committee will be bringin...
  • Mohammed Amin
    In his Financial Times Politics newsletter this morning, based on the advance copy of Ed’s speech, Stephen Bush was very complimentary about Ed’s strategic ...
  • Mohammed Amin
    In his Financial Times Politics newsletter this morning, based on the advance copy of Ed's speech, Stephen Bush was very complimentary about Ed's strategic posi...
  • Roland
    One highly significant consideration has been totally overlooked I all the discussions to date: just how much time and effort is actually needed for a typical b...
  • John Waller
    Thank goodness, it’s time too. Small businesses have been hit with the extra paperwork, the 90 days in 180 days rule restricts consultants trying to build up...