LibLink: David Laws and Tim Farron – Budget 2012: Osborne must help the squeezed middle and tax the top

Rumour a-plenty ahead of George Osborne’s third budget. Adding to theose rumours — or, more likely, giving us the inside gen on what’s likely to transpire — are the former Lib Dem chief secretary to the treasury David Laws and Lib Dem party president Tim Farron in The Guardian. Here’s an excerpt:

Nick Clegg has made the Liberal Democrat priority very clear – a significant acceleration of planned increases in the starting point for paying income tax. This should be Osborne’s centrepiece – easing the pressure on household budgets, after the unprecedented recent squeeze. …

… whatever decisions Osborne makes on individual taxes, here is what he could do. First, clamp down hard on avoidance with specific measures, including on stamp duty, and a tough new general anti-avoidance rule. Second, make it harder for wealthy foreigners to shelter their money from tax. Tax wealth, including property, more. And third, stop some of those in the top 1% from paying such a tiny share of their income in tax (think Mitt Romney’s 13.9% tax rate!). Clegg’s tycoon tax proposal, a basic minimum rate of tax on all income, is a very good idea.

Action for the squeezed middle. A bigger contribution from the top 1%. A tax system for entrepreneurs, not accountants. Those are the liberal litmus tests for the budget.

It’s a good, liberal stance — and interestingly (and very much deliberately) is jointly presented by Orange Booker David Laws and social liberal Tim Farron.

The Guardian and the left will want to frame the budget solely around the issue of the 50p tax rate for higher-rate taxpayers earning more than £150k. This article is a timely reminder that liberals — for whom taxing unearned wealth is preferable to taxing earned income — need to focus on outcomes, namely: How can our tax system best reward those low-paid folk who need a helping hand by redistributing from those not currently paying their fair share?

As David and Tim say, that’s the true ‘liberal litmus test’.

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Mark ValladaresMark Valladares
    @ Matt (Bristol), You use the word “vanguardism” as though politicians don’t have an obligation to lead, rather than merely following the loudest voice...
  • Mark Smulian
    I first worked with Michael on his three pamphlets published in the mid-1980s by Liberator and mentioned above by Geoffrey Payne. He was, obviously, an effectv...
  • Geoff Reid
    As well as being at the heart of the best Assembly/Conference coffee room conversations, Michael was for me the best compass we had over half a century. His lea...
  • Margaret Pollus
    @Tristan Ward Trans women are women - biological women. So the Equality Act 2010 needs to ensure that all womens rights, including pregnancy and maternity prote...
  • David Raw
    Interesting post from Meg Thomas. I well remember the final days of my dear old Granny living on an isolated hill farm in the Durham Pennines. She was helped a...