LibLink: Giles Wilkes – The hidden cost of quantitative easing

Over at The Guardian’s Comment Is Free website, Lib Dem blogger Giles Wilkes – liberal think-tank Centre Forum‘s award-winning chief economist – argues that though quantitative easing was needed to prevent financial collapse, it has made the rich richer, and taxpayers will foot the bill for growing inequality. Here’s an excerpt (but NewsHound does recommend you read the full article to enjoy Giles’s imagined budget speech of a year ago):

QE was the right thing to do: it may become the most significant step that Labour took to fight recession. … [it] quite possibly averted an outcome far worse: an economy-wide insolvency so persistent that Britain may have looked upon Japan’s lost decade with envy.

But uncertainty about how much it may work does not excuse silence about its political ramifications. If QE makes inequality worse, it will be the taxpayer who has to fix the problem. In a new research paper, CentreForum calls for greater recognition of the side-effects of QE.

As we go into a period of fiscal austerity, political decisions about “sharing the burden” need a mature understanding of who has benefited from taxpayer-funded interventions. Some on the right mistakenly believe that it has only been welfare recipients and mythical hordes of public sector bureaucrats. This is not so. In the case of QE, it is the wealthy that have the greatest reason to thank Alistair Darling. Whoever designs the next budget should take this into account.

You can read Giles’s article in full here. And look out for his forthcoming Lib Dem Voice article, coming soon!

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Michael BG
    James Fowler, Indeed if the Bank of England held the Bank Rate at 1%, inflation would increase to a higher rate than if they increased it to 2.5%, about 2% h...
  • Mick Taylor
    We really have to get away from the idea that a party that decides not to stand a candidate automatically gifts its party's voters en bloc to other party. Frank...
  • Roland
    @Michael BG >How would the government ensure different prices are charged for energy from different sources? Simply by changing the market rules s...
  • Chris platts
    As Michal says we need to see people as unique individuals and avoid to many attempts at stereotypes and generalisations. It is hard but we must all be vigilant...
  • Fiona
    The Greens don't stand in all seats for a number of reasons. There have been times when it's been a formal decision to recommend their supporters vote for us - ...