LibLink: Shirley Williams – The line the Lib Dems won’t cross on the NHS

Over at The Guardian, Baroness Shirley Williams has a piece setting out the problems she has with the government’s proposed NHS reforms, and four substantive changes that the Liberal Democrats would like to see made.

Here’s a sample:

First, the role of the secretary of state: as the excellent fifth report of the House of Commons health committee pointed out, the public, who pay for the NHS, look to the secretary of state to be responsible for the delivery of a comprehensive health service, one that is equitable, accessible to all, and free at the time of use. The National Commissioning Board will be accountable to the secretary of state; Monitor, the central regulatory agency that will license any new providers, should be accountable to him too, and should promote competition only on the basis of quality. Its main responsibility should be to promote integrated working and partnership between primary and secondary care and local authorities. The commissioning authorities should determine the shape of service provision, and should be able to commission services from a qualified provider if – and only if – that will complement the overall service provided.

Second, the original proposal for local commissioning bodies to be composed entirely of GPs has been heavily criticised. The Commons health committee, the Royal College of Physicians and the British Medical Association all suggest that the new consortiums should include specialist clinicians. There should also be representatives of other medical professions like nursing, of the local community and one or more independent members, including the chair. The consortiums should have a board, a chief executive and an identified finance director.

Third, openness: there is growing agreement that the local commissioning bodies must meet in public and keep records of their meetings that are open to public scrutiny. Members of commissioning bodies should register publicly any financial interest they may have. The current local authority scrutiny committees are valuable and should be retained.

Fourth, co-terminosity: as far as possible, NHS commissioning authorities should be co-terminous with local authority boundaries, to reduce complex bureaucracy, and to enable commissioners to co-operate with local authorities on social care, and with specialist networks for rare or chronic conditions. These networks are proving successful in improving quality while keeping down costs.

You can read the piece in full here.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • This a good start. The problem, however, is trust.

    How can I or the public believe you now? Why is Clegg only making a fuss, now, after the election massacre? Before the election, Clegg was basically fully signed up to these plans and went around the country extolling the bills virtues. He signed them off in January (I think it was). Now he seems to have “changed his mind” again.

    I do believe Lady Williams, one of the few LDs I view positively, as she has been against these plans from the start while the rest of the party ignored her. But I simply cannot trust Clegg and the rest of the LD MPs, especially as the LDs in the Commons voted this through on its first readings.

    I just don’t believe your party will make any substantial changes or even stop this horrible bill from passing. I am not against reform of the NHS per se, but this reform is just wrong and will harm the NHS for ever. This bill should be dropped for good and a new bill formed.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Paul Holmes
    When I was an MP I remember being shown a block of Council flats in London. We stood on a first floor walkway and my guide pointed to one door that after RtBuy ...
  • Paul Holmes
    AlexB - Housing Associations already have the power to borrow money against their assets, which are of course not subject to the wholesale Right to Buy (at huge...
  • David McHardy
    There is no way out of the housing crisis without mass private building. Private building has stalled because it is unprofitable, as this article explains. This...
  • George Thomas
    "Of course, devolution cannot simply mean moving responsibilities without resources. Local leaders need meaningful fiscal powers, long-term funding settlements ...
  • George Thomas
    Greater devolution without greater funding is a poisoned chalice and that is what's being offered in Wales. That and sly digs at the Senedd. Then it leads t...