LibLink: William Wallace writes for the Independent on the Government’s Brexit dilemma

Regardless of whether you support or oppose Brexit, there is no doubt that you’d prefer your negotiators to be both united and organised. In a piece for yesterday’s Independent, Liberal Democrat Foreign Affairs spokesperson in the Lords, William Wallace, highlights some of the emerging tensions amongst Conservative ranks.

The Leave campaign united around reasserting British sovereignty; but they gave little thought to what that meant, or what continuing relations we would have with our neighbours if we left what has been the institutional framework for a broad partnership for 44 years.

Boris Johnson assured us that other EU countries would give us what we wanted; but he does not seem to know, even now, what exactly he does want. David Davis repeatedly said that economic interests would push the Germans to yield to British demands, even though he insisted that for us political arguments were more important.

And how are these issues manifesting themselves?

Key cabinet committees have met infrequently; officials, and some junior ministers, have resigned in frustration. The EU (Withdrawal) Bill, the key legislative aspect of Brexit, has been delayed by a month after Conservative MPs as well as others put down a list of amendments; it’s unlikely to emerge from Parliament until after Easter next year.

In short, in attempting to hold the Conservative Party together, Theresa May can’t go forward, and daren’t turn back. And all the time, the clock keeps ticking…

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • Nick Hopkinson 31st Oct '17 - 10:01am

    Thanks to Mark for drawing this excellent article to our attention. It is important that Lord Wallace writes about the Brexitshambles in Parliament and government. Many of us predicted this sad situation. Only stopping Brexit will allow government to serve the people as it should.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Wrigley
    I think it helps to look at the parties in terms of their major objective, or usp if you prefer. The Liberal Democrats' major objective is to preserve, prote...
  • James Hill
    @David Allen There is 0% chance that the result of the next election is a Tory-Lib Dem coalition. And the tax cut proposed by Ed has also been proposed by the t...
  • James Hill
    @Rob Heale The problem with VAT, is generally when rates are lowered, the savings are not passed on to consumers and instead pad out profit margins. This has me...
  • James Hill
    @Peter Davies I agree, I think higher rates of pension credit should be looked at – would be a much more effective, targeted and cheaper way to reduce pension...
  • James Hill
    @ David Evans I’m not saying that those two tax proposals would magically change our standing, or that they specifically need to be adopted. But that when we ...