London Liberal Democrats announce GLA shortlist for 2012

London Region Liberal Democrats have announced the candidates for the London Assembly top-up list for the 2012 election. The shortlist is now final and London members will now be issued with a ballot to place the candidates in order of preference.

The candidates, in alphabetical order, are:

Jeremy Ambache (M)
Steve Bradley (M)
Emily Davey (F)
Merlene Emerson (F)*
Bridget Fox (F)
Stephen Knight (M)
Ajmal Masroor (M)*
Caroline Pidgeon (F)
Marisha Ray (F)*
Nick Russell (M)
Shas Sheehan (F)*

Those marked with an asterisk are Black and Minority Ethnic for the purpose of the ethnic preference rule.

There will not be a ballot for the Mayoral candidate for the time being. Nominations for the Mayoral candidate have been postponed.

Helen Duffett is Membership Development Co-ordinator for London Region Liberal Democrats

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in London and Selection news.


  • Given RedKens astonishing Ego its probably a good thing we are holding back on the Mayoral nomination. Kens antics in the Tower Hamlets race would have got anyone else suspended by now.

  • Dumcan Borrowman 19th Oct '10 - 11:52am

    The top of the list should be mayoral candidate to help push up the list vote. But I suspect it will take another couple of elections for London Region to wake up and smell the coffee

  • I agree, if Duwayne wants to prove he’s serious about running for London Mayor, he should’ve put himself forward for the GLA.

  • I know Dee Doocey and Mike Tuffrey are standing down because, by 2012, having done 8 and 10 years respectively on the Assembly they wish to have time to pursue other interests.

  • Simon McGrath 19th Oct '10 - 1:18pm

    Why are the London region continuing with potential discrimination agAinst white candidates despite this being clearly rejected by the party conference?

  • Simon McGrath 19th Oct '10 - 1:19pm

    And it is clearly illegal

  • Grammar Police 19th Oct '10 - 1:25pm

    The shortlisting process whittled the list down to 11 people, so Duwayne may have put himself forward, but not made it through the process.

  • Is it appropriate for shortlisting to reduce the list to the same as the number of candidates? Suppose I was a london member with a trenchant objection to candidate A being a Lib Dem candidate, I would now have no choice

  • I was puzzling over that one too Hywel

  • Actually Duncan if we want to incentivise our mayoral candidate to run a sensible, team building campaign maybe we should place them fourth on the list.

  • david thorpe 19th Oct '10 - 6:38pm

    very strong list a good diverse group.

  • Chris Keating 19th Oct '10 - 6:57pm

    No positive action being taken to reduce the chronic under-representation of North London, I see… 😉

  • Duncan Borrowman 19th Oct '10 - 8:21pm

    I like the idea of the mayoral candidate being 4th. On the issue of having the same number as the total list. It was something I suggested in feedback last time. In reality the selection is for winnable places.

  • Just for the avoidance of doubt I live nowhere near London, don’t have a vote and don’t have objections to any of the candidates that I know of. My pain is therefore limited 🙂

    I can – sort of – understand Duncans reasoning. However candidate selection should reside with the membership not the exec/other body. I would not be happy if a similar approach was taken with the euro candidate selections where a similar argument could apply.

    “Duwayne is not currently an approved candidate. He may have been interested or even applied but I know there were a very limited number of approval days available. ”

    That sounds like London region have erected a fairly significant barrier to ethnic minority candidates who might want to put themselves forward – at the same time as passing a rather complicated measure to address this

  • Duncan Borrowman 20th Oct '10 - 1:32am

    Geographic problem would have been simple. Make the bottom 11 of the list all the constituency candidates. Oh, sorry, that suggestion was scoffed at when I made it to the commission which was wrapped up in the aims of individuals and not what was best for the party.

  • Duncan – there are 14 constituencies and 11 list places, so making “the bottom end of the list all the constituency candidates” doesn’t work

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Helen Dudden
    Warm Spaces is not the answer. As flu and colds spread, people that have immunity and have disabilities wont find that a good idea. The real problem is the ...
  • Cassie
    I’ve just finished a novel where one character has a theory: that people who FIGHT for a cause are just angry and miserable (against people who WORK for a cau...
  • Caron LindsayCaron Lindsay
    Leon, thank you so much for sharing your experience when Noa was born. I really appreciate it and I hear how painful it was for you....
  • John Nicholson
    I totally agree with the phrase "malignant dishonesty" applied to the Home Office by @Anthony Durham. A few years ago, they refused a visa to a Professor from ...
  • Roland
    >we have relied somewhat on the assurances of Ministers at the Dispatch Box This seems to be a big problem with UK law making, too often much is seemingly a...