Chris White reports: a radical approach to localism

I have long thought that Party policy making has tended to be elitist and untransparent. In my own little universe – FPC’s Localism working group – I am keen to change this.

So the papers of the group are now being shared with anyone who put a card in for the Localism debate in Liverpool.

And I will update party members and activists in places like Lib Dem Voice.

We met on 6 October and looked at a new draft of the paper. Our previous thinking is now deeply influenced by the change in the political landscape, not least the Localism Bill due to be published next month.

Accordingly, members of the working group feel that any references to requirements on councils or councillors should go. So there should not be a requirement for councils to provide training or for councillors to represent all constituents. Nor indeed a pledge to review the system of council allowances.

If you want a mayor: have one. If you want the committee system (and be careful of what you wish for) have it. These are all matters for councils and the communities they serve.

We also talked about ‘atomisation’.

In my county the fire service is concerned about the outcomes for disaffected young people. It is easy for it to develop a coherent policy for young people because the fire service is controlled by the county council, not shifted off into a single function authority.

But that is the exception. In most places the fire service has to talk to the police, which has to talk to the council, which has to talk to the health service and so on. Local Strategic Partnerships make them all sit round the same table and try and have the same agenda. Not always with much success.

Surely it would be far easier if councils were in charge of all these functions, either by delivering them or by leading their development?
There is a hint of this in the Government’s health white paper. But we can go further.

Is it right that schools become independent consumers of state money accountable to no-one locally? Or that the police and social services develop their policies separately and then meet occasionally to exchange notes?

Why actually is anyone afraid of local government taking on ALL the services which are delivered locally?

There are two objections.

First: in some places the ruling party appears to be in power for ever, sometimes with huge majorities. The answer, of course, is proportional representation in local government elections, as agreed (again) at the autumn conference. Objection dismissed.

Second: not everything local is local government. Local government does not have all the answers: local business, local communities and local neighbourhoods are all part of the localist landscape.

This turns out to be a much more tricky objection to local government dominance and will certainly keep the Localism working group busy over the next few weeks.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Liberal Eye 19th Oct '10 - 2:49pm

    “I have long thought that Party policy making has tended to be elitist and untransparent.”

    Quite so. Congratulations on attempting to make it a little more open but could it not be even more open (except to trolls, of course)?

  • Andrew Duffield 19th Oct '10 - 10:07pm

    No localisation without choice in taxation!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Martin 11th Aug - 5:20am
    Vince Cable isn't too keen on the idea of a UBI. He says: "My scepticism was fuelled by seeing it advocated with equal fervour both...
  • User AvatarPaul Holmes 11th Aug - 12:27am
    @Marco. The point is though that when we were on 0-6% at the start of Paddy's Leadership it was an unusually low and quite temporary...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 11th Aug - 12:03am
    John Marriott, Canada conducted a UBI trial in the 1970s called Mincome as described in this article https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200624-canadas-forgotten-universal-basic-income-experiment "... for basic income to work on...
  • User Avatarsuzanne fletcher 10th Aug - 11:13pm
    Yes good stuff, after the faff of getting in to watch it. Hope plenty of people do bother though
  • User AvatarMichael Sammon 10th Aug - 11:03pm
    Excellent article Tom. The leadership contest has probably gone on too long, looking forward to us coming together and backing our new leader. Keir Starmer...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 10th Aug - 10:36pm
    As a contribution to debate, without necessarily endorsing it, I attach a search indicator to the Scottish Green Party's paper on UBI. Scotland can lead...