I’d just like to repeat this message that Lib Dem Voice needs someone to take over the running of it. There’s a great community of regular users here – anyone want to step up? If someone wants to do a trial run – see how they get on, with the option of giving it back at the end if they don’t like it, I’m happy to consider that.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
William Wallace writes: The case for higher taxes (Lord William Wallace)
-
“I’ve worked with Andy Burnham. There is much to look forward to” (NewsHound)
-
Mathew on Monday: Ann Widdecombe, robust debate and the need to disagree agreeably (Mathew Hulbert)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat: Visions of America (Tom Arms)
Has the Chancellor set the tone for a Burnham administration?
"His glamour tarnished, his boorishness came to notice": On being the monarch's second son
Recent Comments
Mick Taylor
@Russell. The UK already has almost the worst state pensions in Europe even with the triple lock. We pay out millions in supplementary pensions, housing benefit...
William Wallace
Jana: Investing in strong research and development in key sectors (which is where China is soaring ahead), rebuilding training, apprenticeships and early edu...
David Raw
@ Russell "First, by dumping the triple lock". Are you sure you've posted this on the correct website, Russell ? In the meantime I sincerely hope you never ...
Laurence Cox
Our motto should be "not just higher taxes but fairer taxes". Individuals should be taxed exactly the same on their income whether that comes from earned income...
Russell
By committing to not raising the 3 main taxes but then raising taxes by over £70bn on stupid taxes Labour have done a lot of unnecessary damage to the UK econo...
7 Comments
Well if you asked me nicely… obviously I’d make a few changes, you know, more humour, pictures etc.
Seriously, I think the behind-the-registration-wall private discussion board is a mistake.
Also needs more newsy stuff, on ConservativeHome you find out things you don’t see elsewhere. That is not the case here.
I’m sure the discussion board is a mistake if you’re someone who isn’t a Lib Dem, but this site isn’t here to provide theatre for people of other parties / no party 🙂
I take your point on the news thing though, and will attempt to answer that fully:
1) I tread cautiously breaking things in public these days because the people who reacted strongest against my doing so in the early days were my target audience – grassroots Lib Dem members.
However, there was a slightly crazy position recently where the people who talked to me about our mayoral selection swore me to secrecy, which basically meant I couldn’t run anything until someone like Iain Dale broke it first, which was frustrating. I’m sure someone of a more journalistic bent would’ve found a way to get around being sworn to secrecy.
2) LDV has difficulty doing things like covering selections to the extent that ConHome does, which is their bread & butter to some extent – our party’s rules mean that in many cases if I name a candidate standing for a selection they could be expelled from the race.
3) The Lib Dem blogosphere has for years now been much broader and healthier than the blogosphere of other parties – those bloggers don’t want an upstart coming in and being first with everything. Again, in the early days there was a thirst to be first on LDV, and there were numerous complaints. Again, a more ambitious person might have trampled over that and marched to the top of the hill, but I personally just don’t see the need to do that.
The strength of the LD blogosphere also takes talented people away from this arena – why blog for, and comment on, LDV when you can blog and comment on your own blog?
4) Perhaps more important than all the above – LDV isn’t ConHome. The audience here don’t want that, and I wouldn’t have the time to provide it even if they did!
I agree with Guido. I find forums pretty pointless. The Blog format is just so much better. If you’ve got something worth saying, then say it out loud. By the way Rob, have you had a chance to read the article I emailed you?
I floated the idea of closing the forum to the community in there a while ago, it was completely rejected.
Just reading your article now Laurence.
Actually I do find out about quite a few stories from this site first – stories which are not big enough to make mainstream news but are of interest to people in the party. Guido’s comment that LDV doesn’t score highly on breaking news first may well be true for “professional” political bloggers who read a lot of political blogs, but for party members who just look at a blog or two, I find this very useful.
And Rob’s quite right – there is plenty of discussion on the forum which is quite interesting and just wouldn’t get said in public. I can see why this frustrates non-party members but as he says, this is not set up to be a service to them…
I think Jeremy’s got a good point. A lot of my postings are deliberately round-ups of news that someone like Guido will have already read elsewhere but which someone who spends less time reading political sites probably won’t have read.
Rob (and the new franchise holder) has a hard tightrope to tread. People like me have complained (rightly or wrongly) about things posted in haste in the past, but it needs to stay informative. As Rob says it isn’t ConHome and there is a rich Lib Dem blogosphere out there. Which as Liberals is a good thing.