Message to the Chinese community on how to vote in the EU Referendum

 

The Conservative government (which includes the REMAIN and LEAVE camps) together with the British media have created a lot of fog, untruths and statistics (read ‘lies’) about the EU and Britain’s membership. It does not seem meaningful to discuss IF we don’t do this we can do that, when there are countless probabilities of an IF outcome, especially outcomes that occur in the future.

My message to the Chinese community in Britain to support the REMAIN campaign is, firstly, to consider the historical context and the pursuit of peace, and secondly, the origins of the Chinese community in Britain and the values we bring to British society.

Britain after the Battle of Waterloo of 1815 and during the Victorian era played a diminishing role in the European theatre in pursuit of the expansion of the British Empire and colonies in other parts of the globe. The consequence of this diminishing engagement led to imbalances within the opposing forces (countries) of Continental Europe, accumulating in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, followed by WW1 and WW2, spanning 8 decades and affected every country in Europe, with tens of millions of deaths and hundreds of millions displaced.  Britain did not have a choice on not getting involved in these wars. The reality was Britain could not survive alone within a hostile Continental Europe (while this could be possible in the days of Elizabeth I, it was no longer an option with modern warfare).

Since the end of WW2, Europe has enjoyed the longest period of peace for over 200 years, and this has been achieved by having institutions like the European Union, without which peace could not be imagined possible.  Britain needs to be at the negotiating table to have a voice and an ear in order to shape and influence future events, and to stop history repeating itself with wars and destruction, and endless human suffering.  If you want peace for yourself and your children, and your children’s children, then vote REMAIN.

The main reason the Chinese community found themselves here in Britain was to seek a better way of life from their place of origin. So we were migrants seeking political stability and economic security, just like the migrants today from the Middle East. The Chinese community have worked hard and made themselves prosper and brought prosperity to the wider British society. There is no reason to doubt the new migrants of today would not do the same. Just like our fore-parents have done with their migration to places like Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan, they have created prosperity in those places that made them what they are today. We should welcome the challenges the migrants present us and find beneficial ways to resolve them, and bring about greater prosperity to Britain. Clearly if you want prosperity, vote REMAIN.

Finally, I would like to point out that there seems to be an over emphasise of the word CONTROL, like immigration control, budget control, border control etc, that feels like taking the country back a few generations if not centuries. Backward looking and regressive policies only make us slaves of conditions our fore-parents had fought hard to abolish.  Don’t fall for the fear trap and believe the government can control any of these things. When did the government ever control anything anyway? Forward looking and progressive policies like dialogue, engagement and cooperation are the solutions to the complex world that we live in.

To sum up, the message to the Chinese community is that if you want peace, prosperity and progress, vote REMAIN.  It would be insane to consider the alternative of war and destruction, economic stagnation and a return to the Middle Ages.

 

* Tatyan Cheung is a councillor on Costwold District Council and executive member of Chinese Liberal Democrats

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Richard Easter 9th Jun '16 - 5:12pm

    “Finally, I would like to point out that there seems to be an over emphasise of the word CONTROL, like immigration control, budget control, border control etc, that feels like taking the country back a few generations if not centuries.”

    “When did the government ever control anything anyway?”

    So who should control things? Corporations? The EU Commission? The US?

    Should we actually have no government control of anything, have open borders with the entire world and have no regulations, no laws, nor state provided services?

    What exactly is the point of the above paragraphs?

  • paul barker 9th Jun '16 - 5:41pm

    @Richard Easter, in the modern world lots of groups have influence, even power but no-one has absolute control. Even semi-dictators like Putin cant control the Economy or even ensure that Pensions get paid, allegedly. Modern life is a perpetual negotiation which is why Liberalism the answer.

  • Without meaningful pragmatic and democratic control there can be no liberalism. In a sense the establishment being caught out is a reflection of their own inability to level with the British people. The Establishment have lost control.

  • @ Richard Easter – the point of the paragraph was to highight the limits of “control”.
    Corportations avoid tax because Governments can’t or won’t control them. The USA can’t stop migration from Mexico. Turkey can’t stop refugees from Syria. People who think changing the UK benfit system will stop migrants leaving poverty stricken and war torn countries are wrong. 600 million people have the right to come and live in the UK, have they all done so ? Before the Euro, countries were destabisied by currency speculators. Can the UK control fish or polution without international agreement? Crime ? Immigration? Deportation ?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Steve Trevethan
    Might it be that our current U. K. government is simply complying with the wishes/obsessions of the government of the U. S. A.?...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Might the related confiscation/theft of the monies of its enemies entrusted to the U. S. A, and its allies, have seriously/permanently damaged American financia...
  • Jenny Barnes
    Over 95% of pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries on pavements and verges are caused by motor vehicles, so watch out for the cars! Esp SUVs which are 40% ...
  • Jonathan Brown
    You say security for Israel "rests on deterrence, alliances and the belief among Israel’s enemies that resistance is hopeless". It could also, and more sus...
  • Nonconformistradical
    Regarding the by-election for Mayor of Greater Manchester necessitated by Andy Burnham's resignation from the position. I wonder what the financial cost to t...