Michigan results condensed

Romney wins in Republican contest, giving him two wins so far (Michigan, and the low-profile Wyoming contest) to second-placed McCain’s one (New Hampshire) and third-placed Huckabee’s one (Iowa), who finished third. Net result? Republican contest is still wide open. Next up – South Carolina primary and Nevada caucus on Saturday. South Carolina is being seen as much the more important of the two and is where McCain’s 2000 presidential bid got derailed. This time it is probably Huckabee who faces the bigger risk because, after his initial dramatic win in Iowa, he hasn’t got close to winning again.

On the Democrat side, Clinton got 55% of the vote, with Edwards and Obama not on the ballot paper and their supporters voting for “uncommitted” instead. However, the result may be seen as a blow to her because exit polls show she did very poorly amongst young voters and also black voters. On the other hand, it means she did well amongst older voters. As older voters are more likely to vote, that’s a surer base of support than Obama’s, which relies on him being able to motivate young people to vote in unprecedented numbers. He managed that in Iowa – but it’ll be a tough act to pull off repeatedly. So again – race still wide open. Next up – Nevada caucus (only) on Saturday.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in LDVUSA and News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Can we have a American election poll please?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Alex Macfie
    The French run-off system can be gamed. Say there's a candidate (let's call him Bordan Jardella) who is highly likely to get into the run-off but you are desper...
  • Nick Hopkinson
    Thank you for your informative posts, Tom. Was it intentional to run a piece linking Trump, fruitcakes and nuts?...
  • Mick Taylor
    Now then Peter. The Greens are no longer primarily for the environment and Labour are defintely not for the working class. What do you think we're for?...
  • expats
    Council houses; 'no right to buy'!...
  • peter Wigley
    @Caractacus. Yes we need policies on all the things you mention but, we also need an easily recognisable identity: what is the party for? (Or maybe who is the p...