LDV readers vote to save the monarchy

Amidst all the excitement of the poll for Liberal Voice of the Year 2007 – have you voted yet? – LDV clean forgot to post the results of our earlier readers’ survey, which ran over the New Year.

We asked you: “Do you think the British monarchy should be retained or abolished?”

You told us, albeit by a slender majority, that you’re monarchists at heart. Here’s the full breakdown:

Retain the monarchy: 43% (148)
Abolish it: 40% (140)
Utterly indifferent: 17% (59)
Total Votes: 347

I’ll admit I’m a tad surprised, though perhaps that’s because I’m an instinctive republican who finds it hard to square meritocratic liberalism with hereditary rule. But I’m also a democrat – of course – and if republicanism can’t convince even a majority of readers of a liberal website of its merits that suggests to me it’s time has not yet arrived.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Voice polls.
Advert

24 Comments

  • And of course there is the inconvenient fact that most of the more conspicuously liberal western european states are monarchies.

    Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden etc.

  • 3. London is full of Japanese and other tourists who still flock here to get a sense of the majesty of the Crown. The monarchy is ‘good for business’

    Yet the most visited royal palace in the world is Versailles, where there is no longer a royal family.

    Otherwise though I would agree with you.

  • small-r republican 8th Jan '08 - 3:52pm

    mym: “And of course there is the inconvenient fact that most of the more conspicuously liberal western european states are monarchies.

    Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden etc.”

    Maybe you are confusing the reason and consequence here? Maybe it has been possible for these countries to remain monarchies because they have been liberal enough and the head of the state doesn’t have any real power.

    In Germany, Austria, Italy, Russia etc. the monarchs had some real power still in the beginning of the 20th century and used it in illiberal ways, and that’s the reason why they lost their crowns.

  • > Maybe you are confusing the reason and
    > consequence here?

    Not really. It’s only an inconvenient fact for those wound-up-themselves puritan liberals that are fond of proclaiming the impossibility of co-existence between a constitutional monarchy and any sort of ‘real’ liberal democracy. I’ve met too many of them 🙂

  • Angus J Huck 8th Jan '08 - 5:07pm

    Wit and Wisdom says:

    “the Queen has no power but immense moral authority”

    How much moral authority would King Charles have?

    “She can keep the Executive in check through her influence”

    It is the role of Parliament and the courts to keep the Executive in check, not the Monarch.

    “It would be a very stupid Prime Minister who did not consult with her on important matters – and heed her advice.”

    Why should a Prime Minister consult the Queen and heed her advice?

    What specialist knowledge does the Queen have on any subject?

    “A majority of voters support the monarchy.”

    A majority of voters support capital and corporal punishment, conscription and raising the legal drinking age to 21.

  • > How much moral authority would King
    > Charles have?

    More than you Angus.

    But then you’re just a blogger, and haven’t had exposure to as many extraordinary (and ordinary) situations and people as he has.

    > Why should a Prime Minister consult
    > the Queen and heed her advice?

    You don’t think a Prime Minister should consult the head of state?

  • The last Radical 8th Jan '08 - 5:38pm

    What next?
    I suppose we’ll support the established hurch and its right to have unelected people in the Upper Chamber.

  • Angus J Huck 8th Jan '08 - 5:41pm

    “More than you Angus.”

    Right, so I have required sexual partners to call me “Sir”? I have disengaged from a sexual partner, run away into the bushes, and left her to be photographed by the press? I have encouraged a group of sycophants around me to bad mouth my wife to the media? I kill animals for pleasure?

    I have to do worse than all of that to have less moral authority than Prince Charles.

    But I guess I have more moral authority than you, Mym, because I use my real name and you don’t.

    “But then you’re just a blogger, and haven’t had exposure to as many extraordinary (and ordinary) situations and people as he has.”

    You know absolutely ziltsch about me, Mym. I’m not even a blogger.

  • What’s wrong with an elected monarchy? Then we get an elected Head of State whilst remaining a monarchy.

  • I thought we were supposed to be radicals. That means, I suggest, looking at constitutional matters in rather greater depth than whether of not they are good for tourism.

  • > You know absolutely ziltsch about me,
    > Mym. I’m not even a blogger.

    I call anyone who makes shallow, troll-tinged analyses and avoids answering questions a blogger – it saves time.

    You don’t think a Prime Minister should consult the head of state?

  • One is delighted 🙂

  • Angus J Huck 8th Jan '08 - 8:24pm

    “You don’t think a Prime Minister should consult the head of state?”

    Correct. Especially if that head of state is unelected.

    Mym, trolls are people like you who are too cowardly to use their real names.

  • Have I missed something here? We don’t even know that the votes were all cast by party members, but in any event, 57% of those voting were either utterly indifferent or wanted the monarchy abolished, and yet this is being seen as a victory for the monarchy?

  • But it *is* my name Mr Huck.

    > Correct. Especially if that
    > head of state is unelected.

    So, we can add to your propensity to quote tabloid rumours as evidence, and your misapprehension of the meaning of ‘moral’, an inability to understand how the constitution of any of the world’s modern states works.

    What *is* the basque for ‘troll’, btw?

  • Angus J Huck 8th Jan '08 - 10:16pm

    Actually Mym, unlike you, I DO understand how the British Constitution works. And I have a degree to prove it (plus a prize for being the best student in my year). I don’t suppose YOU have legal qualifications, do you? No, I don’t quote tabloid rumours. The source is Kitty Kelly’s “The Royals”. As for your alleged name, if I remember Pokorny’s dictionary right, it somewhat resembles the Proto-Indo-European word for “urine”. Very appropriate.

    PS: Prince Charles admits he kills animals for pleasure, so no rumour there.

  • Angus you actually won the argument against mym until this:

    “And I have a degree to prove it (plus a prize for being the best student in my year).”

    Oh dear, a “school boy” error to quote your qualifications….and how good you are!
    I agree as I am a signed up repulican, but Angus you really don’t do yourself or the party any favours sometimes.

  • He wasn’t making an argument, so nothing was there for him to lose – even with such a particularly text-book example of pomposity.

    Perhaps it hasn’t crossed his mind that, had he not entered this thread at 5.07 with a bit of (hypocritical) ad hominem against someone he doesn’t know, maybe I wouldn’t have felt inclined to hold up a mirror in response. Corporal Jones Applies methinks.

    “I don’t quote tabloid rumours. The source is Kitty Kelly”

    ROFL.

    Hywel, are you reading? Is this Huck a self-satirist of some sort?

  • Adrian Peirson 1st May '08 - 5:20pm

    The New World Order must get rod of Monarchies and Nationalities.

    http://www.infowars.com

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Michael BG
    Peter Martin, Thank you. I attended Lancaster University and so lived in both constituencies. With a majority of only 1265 and only gaining the seat in 20...
  • Jeff
    [Dominic Cummings] claim that PM Boris Johnson never had any intention of honouring the Northern Ireland Protocol he negotiated has—in the light of subsequ...
  • Nigel Quinton
    Katharine, with the greatest respect I don't think that this motion comes close to delivering the narrative we need. And the amendment calling for a candidate i...
  • Jeff
    But against that is the fact that production by the Russian gas monopoly Gazprom is down because of Covid-19… ‘Gazprom ramps up gas production and...
  • Jeff
    The Our World in Data link above was broken by Wordpress. Just copy and paste the whole thing into your browser. I don't use link shorteners as they hide the de...