Nick Clegg: Europe’s future is our future

Nick Clegg has been in Berlin today, along with Vince Cable. to meet with German ministers and launch the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering, a £1 million reward for an invention that’s changed the world and benefitted humanity.

He took the opportunity to talk about the economic crisis engulfing Europe, making the point that Europe has to work together to sort it. There were no diplomatic niceties in his language as he criticised the failure to find a solution so far:

…our response to this brewing crisis has been woefully fragmented. We have failed on a number of fronts. We have tried to give Europe’s problems different labels, tried to keep them separate. But the world just doesn’t work that way. Management of financial risk, fiscal discipline, labour market reform; these are not just different chapters in an economics textbook. They are closely connected problems with consequences for us all. We have created different classes of country; strong and weak, spenders and savers, Eurozone and non-Eurozone. But these divisions are false. Europe’s economies cannot be prised apart and filed neatly in different boxes; they are too interdependent. And we the way we take decisions is undermining public confidence. Every few weeks European leaders sit down to yet another crisis summit, where another temporary solution is agreed. The tree is falling, and we are pruning one leaf at a time. It is piecemeal politics; endless tactics with no strategy.

He tackled the idea that if Greece were allowed to leave the Euro, the rest of us could just happily get on with our lives and pretend it was nothing to do with us:

And by the way, let me challenge the fashionable assumption being whispered behind cupped hands – that for some countries, leaving the Euro wouldn’t be that bad. That actually, a Greek exit now would be in everyone’s best interests. My own view is that that wildly underestimates the unpredictable, irrevocable damage that could be done to a monetary union when it is shown not to be permanent. No rational person interested in the wealth and wellbeing of Europe’s citizens could advocate taking such a risk: not with Greece’s future, or our own.

He outlined his four point plan to fix things – fiscal mechanisms such as Eurobonds, a responsive monetary policy, decent firewalls to provide a sustainable way of stabilising the banking system and creating the conditions for growth across the single market.

First, faced with different economies, which suffer shocks in different ways, Europe must either share common debt, or change the way money is transferred. You cannot have a monetary union in which one country saves, exports and invests and another spends, borrows and consumes without some mechanism to make it all add up. So we need new fiscal instruments in the Eurozone, through either Eurobonds or greater transfers between Eurozone members.

Second, the European Central Bank has to act as a real monetary backstop, a lender of last resort. This is critical. Fiscal action across the EU must be supported by responsive monetary policy – with central banks prepared to intervene aggressively to support demand.

Third, we must build a firewall big enough and strong enough to stop the flames from spreading. At the moment, countries are stuck in vicious, periodic uncertainty. Tottering banks are propped up by governments. Governments then take the hit from bond markets. Lenders then question whether governments can still shore up the banks. And so the pendulum swings back, only this time everyone’s costs have gone up and the taxpayer ends up deeper in the hole. We need to find a sustainable, realistic way of re-capitalising and stabilising banks.

Fourth, we need to get serious about structural reform. The creation of the single market – the largest borderless single market in the world – is an incredible achievement, one that still has the potential to create hundreds of thousands of jobs. But if that potential is to be realised, we must allow the single market to flourish. We must maintain a relentless focus on creating the right conditions for growth.

Given Nick Clegg’s experience working at the heart of Europe, in the office of the Trade Commissioner, leaders across the EU would do well to take his advice.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and News.


  • Nicola Prigg 24th May '12 - 7:38pm

    I wish Nick had actually said Europe’s future is our future.

  • Richard Dean 24th May '12 - 8:54pm

    This all certainly needed to be said, well done! But can we do anything? We’re not in the Eurozone, and Cameron and Osborne have made it rather clear that we are going for narrow national interest. Prisoners Dilemma. 40% of the world’s current transactions pass through the City of London, so when Europe blames markets they’re blaming us.

    The people I talk to ask – when will it end? Are the politicians telling the truth? Is the debt problem really ten times larger than anyone has so far admitted? And where has the money gone? This must be one of the most massive frauds in history. Why isn’t anyone in jail?

    Somehow the present game of Chicken need to be changed too. If Europe is to mean anything it needs to support its parts that fail, not throw them off. It needs mechanisms like NC suggests, and more. I like wild ideas – sometimes they generate something sensible. Why don’t we Brits take the heat off a little by offering to bail Greeece out ourselves? Spain too?

  • Bill le Breton 24th May '12 - 10:22pm

    “Fiscal action across the EU must be supported by responsive monetary policy – with central banks prepared to intervene aggressively to support demand.”

    If this is what is required in Europe, why is it not what is required in the UK? UK monetary policy is tightening by the day. That is what is keeping the lid on the UK economy. It is as simple as that.

    The latest figures for money (or nominal) GDP in the first quarter of this year came in at the annualized rate of 0.2%. It used to average 5%.

    That is the scale of the disaster unfolding in front of our eyes and, as the IMF has said, this is the disaster that is leading to the permanent destruction of capacity.

    That’s their language for what we Liberals refer to as life chances and opportunities, in short the health and well-being of millions of UK citizens.

    It’s just a pit the leader didn’t give his speech from a soap box outside the Bank of England.

  • Paul Murray 25th May '12 - 6:17am

    “You cannot have monetary union… without some mechanism to make it all add up. So we need… Eurobonds… or transfers”.

    Revisionism? Hindsight? Or something else? The view that monetary union requires fiscal union has been at the centre of opposition to the Euro for many years, but those who argued this case were ridiculed by Brussels in terms that if I repeated them here would cause my post to be flagged for review.

    Eurobonds are impossible for Germany. The German constitutional court ruled last year that they are against the German constitution and quite explicitly instructed that they should not be implemented. Eurobonds force Germany to take responsibility for debts incurred by other countries – whither moral hazard?

    Of course, Target2 imbalances are now creating a “Eurobond by proxy”. If Greece leaves the Eurozone and Germany is left picking up the bill for all Greece’s Target2 liabilities then the Germans will be in for a very nasty surprise indeed – 100bn euro and rising.

  • Paul Murray is correct saying that Eurobonds are a logical conclusion to EU monetary union. But for Germany this is likely to be the killer blow.
    François Hollande, is pressing hard for Eurobonds, and I believe this pressure from France will tip the balance.
    We are all assuming that Greece is on the verge of leaving the euro, but I’m not so sure. I suspect two teams of German accountants are separately calculating the costs.
    Team 1. What is the cost to Germany of Greece leaving the Euro?
    Team 2. What is the cost to Germany of Germany leaving the Euro?
    Whichever team comes up with least cost and greatest recoverability, (for Germany), will be the outcome.
    We may yet see Germany leave the Euro. An unthinkable Black Swan?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Fiona
    As someone who has a lot of professional interactions with developers, I think it's correct that they'll use targets as an excuse to further reduce the quality ...
  • Chris Moore
    It's a target; it's an expression of intent. And that as a country we must do better on housing. The fact it'd be very difficult to meet is precisely the po...
  • Barry Lofty
    Nonconformistradical: Hear Hear!!...
  • Nonconformistradical
    "I notice that the argument against targets was that these hadn’t been met in the past." I voted against Amendment 1 because I really could not see how, wi...
  • Peter Martin
    'Britain’s “new towns” programme of the 1940s and 1950s had been successful because development corporations could buy vast tracts of land at agricul...