The BBC reports Nick Clegg’s reaction to David Cameron’s speech on the EU. The Liberal Democrat leader made it clear that he thought it was not in the national interest to renegotiate the terms of Britain’s EU membership. He said that the biggest challenge facing Britain was a fragile economy and that the Liberal Democrat priority was to build a strong economy in fair society. Yes, that phrase again. Something tells me we’d better get used to hearing it.
He added that it was up to David Cameron what went in the Tory manifesto, but that his priorities were reforming the EU, supporting a referendum if there were a major change as outlined in legislation and prioritising jobs and growth. He felt that years of uncertainty would damage our economic prospects.
He said:
My view is that years and years of uncertainty because of a protracted, ill-defined renegotiation of our place in Europe is not in the national interest because it hits growth and jobs.
* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Standing too many candidates costs Reform at the ballot box
The Joy of Six 1371
Friends of Blackness Summer Fair tomorrow! #dundeewestend
Is Labour's comprehensive spending review starting to unravel?
Saltwell sandwiches
Nonconformistradical
Jenny Barnes
Ben C
nigel hunter
15 Comments
Classic case of politician favours democracy when in opposition and then drops principles when in power.
A very odd comment from Thomas Long; I cannot work out if he refers to Cameron, Clegg, himself or another, unless he thinks the renegotiation might be about democratic systems. Supporting a referendum in the event of a treaty that significantly transfers powers out of Westminster was in the last manifesto.
Personally I am queasy about referendums as they tend to be adjudged less on the question, but more on who is asking the question. If Cameron is putting the question in 2017 can he be sure that there will not be a lot of discontent towards him at this time?
I assume Nick will be backing Ed’s commitment not to hold a referendum then?
g – I imagine he will stick to the line about an In/Out referendum if there is a major treaty change.
Isn’t the real political issue at the next election going to be the issue of renegotiation, not the question of a referendum?
On the face of it, this ought to be an opportunity for the Lib Dems to differentiate themselves from the Conservatives on an important issue. Given Cameron’s policy, a vote for the Conservatives in 2015 will amount to a vote for partial disengagement from the EU at best. There must be many pro-European Conservatives who will not be keen on that.
It it really democratic for Cameron to offer only some of the logical options? What about voters who , for example, who may want to keep the status quo, wishing neither to become semi-detached, nor leave the EU altogether?
“The Liberal Democrat leader made it clear that he thought it was not in the national interest to renegotiate the terms of Britain’s EU membership”
If not now* – when the eurozone is federalising in a way that will marginalise british interests if unreformed – then when?
* now, as in a process that will lead up to a ~2016 referendum
How about at a time when Labour won’t run to all the media to tell them that this referendum isn’t about Europe at all, it’s about spending cuts, and you need to vote against the government in order to tell them you don’t like spending cuts?
We need a serious debate about the UK’s future in Europe. We cannot have it in this environment.
“How about at a time when Labour won’t run to all the media to tell them that this referendum isn’t about Europe at all, it’s about spending cuts, and you need to vote against the government in order to tell them you don’t like spending cuts?”
if you treat people like monkeys, don’t be surprised if they act like one.
@Chris
“Isn’t the real political issue at the next election going to be the issue of renegotiation”
Nail. Hit. On. Head.
Any referendum Cameron proposes to hold will offer two alternatives: the poisonous and the unpalatable.
The UK is in the top 4, of contributors to the EU, with a payment of about 13% of the EU budget. If 13% of your customers, suddenly queue outside the doors of your bank, with the clear intention of closing their accounts, then you may find that you do not have a viable bank anymore.
Angela Merkel knows this. She will compromise, and will negotiate with Cameron, but not because she values the British political input to Europe. She knows that if the British cheques stop coming, then the German and French cheques will have to be increased, to head off Eurogeddon.
Follow the money, not the hot air and political rhetoric.
Don’t be silly – the flow of UK money to Europe will not go down if we’re no longer part of the EU. It’ll probably go up, because we’ll still be buying their products, but the inevitable hefty tax that they’ll slap on us will both collect another large chunk of cash from that trade, and mean other people in Europe turn to the German markets to provide the things we currently do.
Angela Merkel fantasises about such a future, where she can lead the new German Union to economic dominance.
If they’re acting like monkeys, don’t expect them to build bridges.
Oh Andrew, to be the first wailing portent of doom, for shame!
Germany, Finland, denmark, Sweden, and the Netherlands will all be supportive of the ambitions direction, not least because they believe in free markets and rely on Britain’s weight in the eu to push that argument.
The sky will not fall in, you should know better.
FUD – spreading fear uncertainty and doubt.
Angela has used the UK’s isolationism to reinforce her position as Queen of Europe. Cameron and Osborne have managed to make sure that we must all go begging to her if we want anything at all.
Since they are being asked to foot the bill i remain more than a little sympathetic to German demands for more supranational control over national fiscal policy.
That said, in the end it remains their own fault for subsuming german identity into a putative european one, in a manner so emotional it prevents them recognising the need to walk away from sunk-costs.