Observations of an ex pat: Tough for Trump

Donald Trump is in a no-win situation as regards  Russian hacking vs. American intelligence agencies vs Donald Trump.

Putin, as we all know by now, has been accused by all the American intelligence agencies (and several foreign ones) of hacking into the computers of the Democratic National Committee and leaking the contents to help Trump win the US presidency.

The Russian President has denied this as he has denied many other misdeeds. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, he channel for the leaks, has backed him up. So has Donald Trump.

On the other side of the fence are, not surprisingly, a Democratic Party in search of a scapegoat to explain the inexplicable and America’s spy nerds.

Trump can’t really say that he agrees with the intelligence agencies. To do so would leave him branded as Putin’s poodle and undermine his mandate to govern. 

On the other hand, if he rejects the advice of his own intelligence experts than he undermines the workings of the American government and damages his future  relationship with the CIA, FBI, military intelligence and the National Security Agency.

It would be difficult for any government employee to work with a president whom he believes sacrificed  America’s electoral system.  Conversely, if Trump honestly believes that the intelligence agencies are being orchestrated by his political opponents, he will have difficulty accepting  assessments which  he needs to make decisions affecting the entire world.

There is, as expected these days, another conspiracy theory doing the rounds. That is that the Democratic Party  Establishment and President Barack Obama are orchestrating the hacking row to protect the Obama legacy.

Well, let’s look at the backgrounds of the heads of the three agencies laying the blame at Putin’s door. Any pro-Obama conspiracy would require their coordinated connivance.

James Comey, director of the FBI took up his position in 2013 after a long legal career which included a stint as Deputy Attorney General under George W. Bush. He has been a registered Republican  most of his adult life and contributed to the campaigns of Republican presidential hopefuls Mitt Romney and John McCain. On top of that, his credentials as an Obama-Clinton supporter were, shall we say, questioned,  when he reopened the Clinton email case days before the November election.

It is difficult to pin a political label on CIA Director John O. Brennan. With 25 years at Langley and its various outposts, he is a career spy.  Of course,  at the end of November he took the unusual step of publicly warning President-elect Trump to be wary of Russia,  and urged him to keep in place the  Iran nuclear deal.  Balance that against the reason he was not appointed CIA director sooner: Senate opposition because he implemented the Bush policy of sending terrorist suspects to countries where it was known they would be tortured.

Admiral William Rogers took up his post at the National Security Agency in 2014. He is also head of US Cyber Command. The NSA is America’s electronic spy agency.  Admiral Rogers is a career navy man whose last post was head of the US Navy’s electronic spy operations.  The post of director of the NSA does not require Senate confirmation, but that of head of US Cyber Command does. He was unanimously approved.

So on balance, it seems highly unlikely that the heads of the American intelligence agencies have turned their backs on distinguished cross-party careers,  abandoned any shred of impartiality and are conspiring with the Democratic leadership to destroy Trump before he takes the oath of office.  They are, therefore, either very right or very wrong.

From Putin’s point of view it really doesn’t matter. The resulting confusion, accusations and counteraccusations, means he is the only winner. As Trump recently tweeted about the Russian leader: “I always knew he was very smart.”

* Tom Arms is a Wandsworth Lib Dem and produces and presents the podcast www.lookaheadnews.com

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

4 Comments

  • I’m sceptical about such claims…After all, past history shows that, far from needing foreign government resources, US systems can be ‘hacked’ by 15 year olds working from in their bedrooms…

  • Musiewild.
    I think the exact opposite. The democrats are just trying to blame everyone and everything except themselves. plus throwing in a bit of nostalgia for red menace era conspiracy theories. If right-wingers were saying this kind of thing everyone would rightly be making jokes about tinfoil hats.

  • Richard Underhill 8th Jun '17 - 5:23pm

    Glenn: No. Please see the evidence that former FBI Director Comey gave to the Senate enquiry in open session on 8/6/2017. This should be seen in the context of the 2017 Richard Dimbleby Lecture, given by a former CIA Director.
    The Russians are acting “for their own advantage” and not for either party in the USA.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 19th Nov - 10:00am
    Catherine Jane Crosland, you are right about my imperfect choice of words, but please distinguish between my overall scenario, which is hopefully, among some minor...
  • User AvatarBrianD 19th Nov - 9:12am
    Blair is trying to help people and he is spending his own money (presumably from lucrative lectures) doing it. Surely any self respecting liberal would...
  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 19th Nov - 9:02am
    Arnold, I really must take issue with your claim that the EU is "the only force still defending freedom, modernity, civility, decency and the rule...
  • User AvatarDavid Lowrence 19th Nov - 8:47am
    "And that is why people voted for Kennedy in 2005, Clegg in 2010 and now Corbyn." None of whom ever achieved a majority.
  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 19th Nov - 8:30am
    Katharine, I think when Arnold used the word "phantasy" he meant to suggest "vision" or "dream". The difference between the words is interesting. It could...
  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 19th Nov - 8:18am
    Thank you Katharine, for your kind words. You seem to have detected some limits to my second-language skills: I should have used the term imagination...