Tag Archives: putin

Observations of an ex pat: Tough for Trump

Donald Trump is in a no-win situation as regards  Russian hacking vs. American intelligence agencies vs Donald Trump.

Putin, as we all know by now, has been accused by all the American intelligence agencies (and several foreign ones) of hacking into the computers of the Democratic National Committee and leaking the contents to help Trump win the US presidency.

The Russian President has denied this as he has denied many other misdeeds. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, he channel for the leaks, has backed him up. So has Donald Trump.

On the other side of the fence are, not surprisingly, a Democratic Party in search of a scapegoat to explain the inexplicable and America’s spy nerds.

Trump can’t really say that he agrees with the intelligence agencies. To do so would leave him branded as Putin’s poodle and undermine his mandate to govern. 

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 4 Comments

LibLink: Edward McMillan-Scott: EU values are in stark contrast to Putin’s

European FlagLiberal Democrat MEP for Yorkshire and the Humber Edward McMilan-Scott, who is also the European Parliament’s Vice President for Human Rights, has been writing in the Yorkshire Post about the contest between the values of the EU and those of Vladimir Putin. The EU is built on democracy and liberal values while Putin seeks to build a Eurasian alliance built on homophobia and nationalism.

To understand what is happening in the Ukraine, we have to know something of President Putin’s Eurasian dream that is steering events. This involves the

Posted in LibLink | Also tagged , , , and | 13 Comments

Opinion: Ukraine – Next Steps

ukraineAn international affairs policy wonk could be forgiven for thinking that April Fools’ Day had come early. After all, the last 72 hours have seen the Russian Federation occupy Ukraine’s Crimea, and apparently threaten to attack Ukrainian forces in Crimea if they don’t surrender. Such an action is in direct violation of the 1994 Bucharest Memorandum, the OSCE’s Helsinki Final Act, and Article 2(4) of the UN Charter.

The use of force without the explicit authorisation of the UN Security Council has a very specific name: aggression. The Nuremburg Tribunal described aggression as the “supreme international crime”: aggression starts wars, destroys lives and is a visceral attack on the international rule of law.

Simply, aggression is international gangsterism of the highest order.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 70 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 29th Mar - 4:55pm
    Is it not possible to hold a virtual conference? Even if the number attending individual events was limited, all those registering should be able to...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 29th Mar - 4:39pm
    David Raw: No, it was the invasion of Poland that precipitated the war. But at the time Chamberlain was talking about it being over in...
  • User AvatarChris Cory 29th Mar - 4:37pm
    @Paul. Like Andy, I attended a Vince Cable meeting, this time upstairs at the Slug and Lettuce in Southampton. Packed. Standing room only. At a...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 29th Mar - 4:28pm
    "a shift in policy against appeasement (still a popular policy at the time). " Errrrrr, no. Not on 10 May, 1940 eight months into the...
  • User AvatarSue Sutherland 29th Mar - 4:14pm
    Hi Mark I did indeed see the report of the Board here on LDV and even commented on it. However, I didn’t take it in...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 29th Mar - 3:57pm
    John Marriott: Labour joined the Wartime Coalition in 1940 on condition that Chamberlain be replaced by Winston Churchill as Prime Minister, and a shift in...