Observations of an Expat: Kashmir in a changed world

Fifteen years ago there were probably three major hotspots in the world: The Korean Peninsula, the Middle East and Kashmir. All three of them involved nuclear weapons.

Ranked in terms of potential flare-ups, the Middle East was at the top followed by Korea because the United States was heavily involved in both those disputes. Kashmir was well down the list because it was mainly a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan, although China also had a foothold in the picture postcard mountain region. Kashmir, however, seemed more manageable than the other two hotspots.

This month, however, Kashmir moved up the troublesome leader board after Muslim terrorists murdered a group of Indian tourists. The links between the Pakistan government and the terrorists is uncertain. What is known is that Pakistan is controlled by the army and the army is control by General Asim Munir, an Islamic scholar who recently referred to Kashmir as “the jugular vein of Pakistan.”

The Hindu nationalist government of Narendra Modi does not need much to encourage it to go after Pakistan. It did so this week by threatening to cut Pakistan off from vital water supplies and by launching a surgical strike 70 miles inside Pakistan in the important Punjab region.

Pakistan responded by shooting down Indian war planes and by firing the opening shots in South Asia’s first drone war.

Then, both sides appear to have taken a step back to catch their breath and review the situation. Pakistan has said it will respond to the latest fighting “at a time and place of its choosing,” which is usually interpreted a step towards a ceasefire.

All of this would be encouraging if the world had not moved on in the past 15 years—and not in a good way. For a start, in Ukraine, Europe is the middle of its first major conflict involving Russia since the end of War Two. On the other side of the European land mass, North Korea is nuclear-armed and equipped with the missiles to deliver them and China is making increasingly bellicose moves around Taiwan and the South China Sea.

In the Middle East, more than two million Gazans are being starved to death by an Israeli government who appears determined to condemn the region to perpetual war.

In Europe a string of populist and “illiberal” political parties and governments are dividing electorates and driving them away from cooperation towards narrow nationalist-focussed policies.

And finally, in the United States, voters have elected a president who is splitting the Western Alliance, relinquishing America’s leadership role and allying his country with autocratic and populist governments whose positions run counter to 250 years of tried and tested American values.

The world has changed dramatically in the past 15 years. A weakened and over-extended West and an unwilling America means that the revival of old conflicts in Kashmir can boil over faster and more dangerously than before.

* Tom Arms is foreign editor of Liberal Democrat Voice. He also contributes to “The New World” magazine and lectures on world affairs. He is the author of “America Made in Britain,” two editions of “The Encyclopaedia of the Cold War” and “The Falklands Crisis.”

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • There seems to be a complete loss of the value of human life in at least two of these conflicts. War has always been gruesome. Defined battle fields however kept the loss of civilian lives to a minimum. With the advent of modern artillery and drones it is too easy to inflict mass destruction on areas far from the battle lines. This makes it all the more urgent to intensify efforts to make war an act of last resort. World opinion should not shirk from making it clear that wanton destruction of lives not directly involved in conflict will not be tolerated.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Paul, I accept you are agreeing to an extent. A limited extent. "There are ample legal mechanisms for ensuring that the financial settlement with t...
  • Paul WalterPaul Walter
    Peter: “We shouldn’t tolerate the term “Crown Dependency” being a synonym for “tax haven”.” I don’t know whether you are actually reading my ...
  • David Raw
    I rather thought the 3rd Duke and Duchess of Atholl sold the Isle of Man's feudal and sovereign rights in 1765 for £70,000 via the Isle of Man Purchase Act 176...
  • Roland
    @Peter Martin - I was responding to the curved ? ball Jeff throw out about Motability: If they can't charge VAT then its okay to reclaim the VAT rather than sim...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Simon, "Low earners on the IOM pay tax at 21% compared to – I think – 20% in the UK" I don't know where you get your IOM figure from. It is easy eno...