Official: Lib Dems the winners in 2009 local by-elections

There’s been a fair degree of criticism of the Lib Dems’ parliamentary by-election performances in the last couple of years: the 2006 ‘glory days’ of beating Labour in Dunfermline, and coming oh-so-close against the Tories in Bromley have seemed an increasingly distant memory. So, let’s celebrate an arena where the party is doing well: local government by-elections. And not merely doing well: in fact, doing better than the other two major parties.

(Hat-tips to John’s Liberal Revolution blog and to middle englander on the Vote 2007 website).

Here are the summary results of the 280 by-elections held during 2009:

  • Lib Dems: gained +28, lost -11. Net gain: +17 seats.
  • Tories: gained +10, lost -34. Net loss: -24 seats.
  • Labour: gained +23, lost -11. Net gain: +12 seats.

So there you have it: the Lib Dems’ performance in local government by-elections was the best of the major parties.

The results come with caveats, of course:

(i) the Tories were defending many more seats – just over half of those they contested, in fact – and they won more seats overall (123 to the Lib Dems’ 68 and Labour’s 60);

(ii) the retention rate, defined as seats retained as the proportion of seats defended, of all three parties was broadly similar: the Lib Dems were a nose ahead, retaining 79% of seats we defended, with the Tories and Labour each on 78%; and

(iii) probably most significantly, that the Tories are losing more seats than they’re winning does not mean the opinion polls are wrong. In the last quarter of 1996, Labour chalked up a net loss of two seats, while the Tories achieved a net gain of 16: yet the Tory parliamentary party was decimated in the election that followed.

However, I think the Lib Dems can justly take some pride (or draw some comfort, depending on your disposition) that, while in the last quarter of 1996 we made a net loss of 13 seats, in the last three months of 2009, we gained five seats – and that we’re successfully defending more seats in 2009 than we were managing in 1996.

Congratulations to those councillors elected, to their local parties, and to ALDC, for achieving these results.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Local government and Polls.
Advert

One Comment

  • With the recent defection in Cheltenham and the Mayoral win a couple of months ago in Bedford we effectively won control of two councils as well.

One Trackback

  • By Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #149 on Sun 27th December 2009 at 6:32 pm.

    […] Official: Lib Dems the winners in 2009 local by-elections by Stephen Tall on Lib Dem Voice. A net gain of 17 seats: not bad for a year’s […]

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Phil Wainewright
    Yes @Tim Rogers of course we need policies that deliver for people now. My point is that, if we don’t put those policies in the context of our longer term goa...
  • Christina Evans
    Very sensible idea, lib dems ,labour and greens form a coalition if we get a hung parliament. Kemi Badenoch has given a nod that the Tories would go in with the...
  • Suzanne Fletcher
    Yes I agree re the backdrop, just what is wrong with promoting who we are and what we stand for, rather than meaningless "fairer" type slogans. Good to read Ca...
  • Tim Rogers
    Sorry but l do not believe that the British people would accept a message of golden times in 25 years They are tired of reasoned and calm debate that got us to...
  • Tim Rogers
    Argentina are past masters at sabre rattling so I do not see the Falklands as under imminent threat. Milei faces an election next year and is in an unenviable p...