Opinion: Hoping for more women presenting election coverage

Wading through some 1960s election coverage (yes, I should get out more) I was taken aback by a comment from the presenter Cliff Michelmore as he passed onto a colleague: “The girls are much prettier than last time.” He was referring to the typists. The main role of women on these election programmes was to type out the results. Tappy tap tap they went in the background; but theirs was not to speak because it all had to be interpreted by important people – funnily enough all men.

By the 1970s “girls” were actually allowed to say things! Sue Lawley and Esther Rantzen appear amongst the Bobs, Robins and Butlers and they are even allowed to point to maps and proffer some analysis. Though, of course, they are never allowed near the swingometer. As is often remarked, Dimblebys and Paxos are allowed to get old in their roles but if anyone suggested that a 74 year old Rantzen or a 68 year old Lawley front mainstream election coverage they would be a laughing stock.

Even in 2010 not a single woman fronted one of the national debates and just one will do so this time. Generally though the situation on national television is much better – with Wark, Newman, Maitlis, Stratton and a few superb women from ethnic minorities such as Anuskha Asthana and Afua Hirsch coming through.

Sadly though the position on regional TV is not great. Male presenters can go on forever but not women. Take the regional edition of the Sunday Politics. While the national and daily versions have a credible history of female presenters and pundits, at regional level only 3 local versions of the programme (out of 14 versions broadcast last Sunday) were presented by women and just one was presented by someone from a visible ethnic minority.

This week a female black teenager brought the PM to a rare standstill with a question on the tampon tax. Let’s hope as the opening credits roll for Election 2025 someone like her will be the seasoned presenter at the helm.

* Ruth Bright has been a councillor in Southwark and Parliamentary Candidate for Hampshire East

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News and Op-eds.
Advert

15 Comments

  • Eddie Sammon 4th Feb '15 - 4:36pm

    Ruth, it is good to see you writing on here and to hear from a fellow political junkie. Your article is also stimulating.

    I like to make constructive criticism. I find that the difference between someone who will have a tough time in politics and someone who will find it quite easy can be someone who tiresomely deals with the concerns of everyone. It can be repetitive, but someone who reassures, rather than worries, has a good chance of going a long way.

    Best of luck and women campaigning against sexism has certainly changed my behaviour, even if I’ll most probably always argue against absolutism.

  • David Faggiani 4th Feb '15 - 4:45pm

    Hear, hear.

    I got mocked by friends, and deservedly so, for getting engrossed by the 1992 UK election coverage on YouTube a few months back. You don’t have to go all the way back to the 1960s to be transported into a different televisual (and parliamentary) era….

  • It would be good to get more female commenters on Lib Dem Voice.
    The majority are male, as are Lib Dem MPs.
    Any info on how many members are female ?

  • Ruth Bright 4th Feb '15 - 6:20pm

    Thanks Eddie.

    PBBrown agreed the ratio is terrible but I suspect we do rather better for female councillors.

    David Faggiani let’s hope there are some support groups for people who get addicted to this archive coverage! I am sure we wouldn’t be the only attendees. Alas for me the coverage from 1992 is too familiar to feel that dated!

  • Ruth — If God had intended women to present Election Coverage on the TV — he would have called them Dimble -Bee.

    I suppose that just because the BBC General Election coverage for more than fifty years has involved a Dimble-Bee you will be suggesting that the BBC has a strange equal opportunities policy.

    A reasonable person might assume that the BBC does not have an equal opportunities policy at all.

  • Stephen Donnelly 4th Feb '15 - 11:03pm

    I obviously would like to see a better male-female balance. A better public school – state school balance would also be good.

    One should not be achieved at the expense of the other.

  • Ruth Bright 5th Feb '15 - 8:42am

    Fair enough Stephen but I don’t think it’s as stark as female-male balance being achieved at the expense of public school – state school balance. In any case “privileged” women who take their place in the media still face barriers to success like the challenge of balancing work, maternity leave and bringing up young children.

  • Ruth Bright 5th Feb ’15 – 8:42am
    The need for more women presenters on TV and maybe also some people from state schools?

    As you mentioned Esther Rantzen in your article I thought it might provide some context to mention her daughter Rebecca Wilcox who at 37 has had quite a good start to her career in broadcasting.
    http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=rebecca+wilcox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-gb&client=safari

    It may of course be that she is amazingly talented and far superior in her TV skills to anyone of the 93% of the population who attended state schools.

    My theory is that because her parents were both BBC royalty she maybe did not face quite so many barriers in her early career.
    I think that Esther’s dad also worked for the BBC. So perhaps it is just in the DNA.

    I usually agree with you, Ruth, but I find it hard to believe that these “…privileged women … in the media still face barriers to success like the challenge of balancing work, maternity leave and bringing up young children.”
    I think their careers were several rungs up the ladder of success before they were even born.

  • peter tyzack 5th Feb '15 - 9:59am

    – they could free-up a space or two by getting rid of that awful bully Andrew Neil and his puerile humour. Allegra Stratton would do a much better job.

  • peter tyzack 5th Feb '15 - 10:03am

    you can spot who the public school ones are, they are the only people who use that posh word ‘extraordinary’.

  • Peter Tyzack

    You mention Allegra Stratton. Her school ? Latymer Upper.

    Fees (from September 2014): Upper School £5,770 per term

    Plus—-Lunches: £4.14 per day payable termly in advance; Music Tuition Fee £266 per term; Musical Instrument Hire £33 per term. There are also Other optional charges:

  • Ruth Bright 5th Feb '15 - 7:27pm

    I desperately want us to avoid going round in our usual circles about this gender/class, class/gender thing. Sorry to tease you John but Before I wrote this piece I was thinking of fashioning another entitled: “John Tilley is right”! Because, like you I did a bit of research on my favourite female presenters and was disheartened to see how many came from “posh” schools, had it easy backgrounds or even a seemingly hereditary broadcasting background. You are right. Dead right.

    However we can only apply our own experience to these things. My own experience is that I can only identify two bits of indirect discrimination I have experienced as a result of being the ninth child of a bricklayer (one relating to a school trip and one relating to a piece of career advice). These were irritating but hardly life changing! No-one has ever whistled at me or shouted at me in the street for having working class roots!

    Until I had my kids I never experienced a glass ceiling in the party. Motherhood derails many a career and I for one have found it very inspiring to see women with similar family (if not financial) circumstances to mine become successful.

    Some role models can be posh as long as it isn’t ALL of them! Sorry if this is a bit disjointed – trying to get the kids to bed at the same time as writing!

  • Ruth Bright 31st Mar '15 - 3:47pm

    postscript Julie Etchingham to host only 7 way debate hooray!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Richard Whelan
    I attended the one on Friday and, like you said Caron, felt that the party really did want to know the views of members. I look forward to seeing what emerges ...
  • David Raw
    @ Neil Hickman Thanks for stirring a memory Neil. I was employed at LPO (Party HQ) way back in June 1964, and took part in the massive international campaign...
  • Tom Reeve
    What strikes me about this discussion is what is absent from it. We are debating how to fund services to the last decimal place, and nobody mentions that the we...
  • paul barker
    I wasn't able to make any of the Party discussions on this but I would have supported forming this Coalition anyway. I feel that Libdem & Green members have...
  • Neil Hickman
    The current World Cup, beside being a monumental exercise in chiselling, is a massive ego trip for one of the most unpleasant and dangerous individuals on the p...