Opinion: Cast-iron Conservatism – brittle promises obtained from a flexible friend

On 26th September 2007 David Cameron gave what he called a cast-iron guarantee. The guarantee appeared in a piece published under his name in Mr Murdoch’s Sun. Liberal Democrats, who set some store by their own political education and haven’t read the piece, really should take the opportunity to read it in its entirety.

The aspiring party leader explains that it is an article of faith for him that: “No treaty should be ratified without consulting the British people in a referendum.” And, because of that, he promises, any Conservative government led by him will “hold a referendum on any EU treaty.”

Mr Cameron explains, in the same piece, that his determination to hold a referendum isn’t simply a reflection of his deepest political beliefs but a practical matter too. It is integral to Conservative economic policy making. Why should that be? The explanation seems straightforward. It is vital because: “One of the great challenges [facing the UK is] rolling back the tide of bureaucracy.” And, Mr Cameron continues, “you can’t do that without targeting one of the main sources of this bureaucracy – Brussels.”

Without the referendum he’d promised Mr Cameron makes it clear it will not be possible to free UK businesses from red tape; the kind of European regulation which makes it impossible for the UK economy to succeed. Of course what most of us call regulation – and Mr Cameron calls red tape – isn’t quite the easy target that it once was. And Mr Cameron’s cast-iron guarantee has almost completely rusted away.

Just two years after giving his promise the Tory leader – who distinguished himself from Gordon Brown before Sun readers because of his own principled stand on the Lisbon Treaty – is about to dump his absolute commitment on the Treaty.

Sun readers and Conservatives – not quite the same thing – are not the only ones who are entitled to ask: “What does a cast-iron guarantee from Mr Cameron add up to?” However, some of those you might have expected not to have been easily taken in by a Cameron promise – such as Tory MP Bill Cash – still don’t appear to get it. Mr Cash insists that Mr Cameron’s promise is…well…unbreakable; there can be “No ifs no buts”.

Mr Cash continues to tell The Daily Telegraph: “We need a full referendum on Lisbon as we were promised.”

Of course Mr Cash would do well to talk to Mr Cameron’s closest associates, the ones who recently made it clear to Financial Times reporters Jean Eaglesham and Alex Barker that: it is unfair “…to hark back to remarks in an interview with the Sun, as [Mr Cameron’s] pledge [needs] to be seen in the context of the expectation then that a general election was likely in weeks.”

So what should we expect a principled and tactically astute Conservative leader to do? Whatever it is it is unlikely to be what Mr Cameron does. Sources close to the Tory leader are already letting it be known that a Conservative manifesto promise to negotiate opt outs for the UK from EU social and employment law will be pursued pragmatically. What – you might ask – does that mean?

Eaglesham and Barker were alerted to a Tory strategy that would ‘hijack’ the process of Croatian accession to the EU in 2010 and 2011. The plan: to use Croatian accession as a lever to extract concessions capable of being packaged and presented to the British public as evidence of unqualified Conservative determination to put British interests first in Europe.

Anyone who doubts that David Cameron is Blairlike and Blairlite should be encouraged to go and read not only the cast-iron guarantee given to Sun readers in September 2007 but Mr Cameron’s carefully crafted denunciation of Labour rivals. Without a hint of irony, Mr Cameron declares that disingenuous British politicians are responsible for spreading a ‘cancer that is eating away at trust in politics’. And, for those who make it to the end of Cameron’s September 2007 serving to Sun readers, there is a closing offer, new politics for old; an offer that would surely put most snake oil salesmen to shame.

* Ed Randall, a Liberal Democrat councillor in the London Borough of Greenwich from 1982 to 1998, edited the Dictionary of Liberal Thought jointly with Duncan Brack. Ed lectures on Politics and Risk at Goldsmiths University of London and has recently published Food, Risk and Politics (Manchester University Press – 2009). Read more opinion articles by Ed Randall

Read more by or more about , , , , , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 4th Nov '09 - 12:13pm

    Surely it would be simpler to make a list of politicians who have kept their promises.

  • Herbert Brown 4th Nov '09 - 2:11pm

    None of the three main parties has come out of this sorry saga well, though Cameron’s claim that a treaty stops being a treaty once it has been ratified looks to be the most desperate excuse of all. Surely precisely the opposite is true.

  • Matthew Huntbach 4th Nov '09 - 10:15pm

    As we have seen, Mrs Thatcher’s privatisations have meant things which were once under the control of the British crown, quite vital things like our energy supply and our railways and our water supply, were put into private control, and have now ended up foreign owned. So why did we not get a referendum on these?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Katharine Pindar
    Thanks for replying, Peter - so you believe in nationalising the public utilities, and I can see the point of that. But you don't yet explain how far you agree ...
  • David Raw
    @ Peter Martin "This is not to say we should let elderly people die from the cold but if we want to “save money” that’s probably what needs to happen"....
  • Jane Mansfield
    @ Peter Martin, Now that I have had my wings clipped because I am caring for a disabled husband, I scan through the headlines of most newspapers to check what...
  • David Raw
    It may surprise Mr Martin to learn that I agree with him that the utilities (including water and the railways) should be in the public sector........ indeed, ba...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Katharine, The nationalisation of the Utilities does have widespread support. Lib Dems at one time did believe in the mixed economy which isn't the same th...