Opinion: Democracy, the Rule of Law and New Labour

Back in the 1980s my employer, encouraged by some important orders I’d picked up in what we then called Eastern Europe, asked me to try to build up a distribution network in as many countries as I could. In creating this customer base, I made a number of good friends in Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary and Yugoslavia. It was good business, though never easy, and my sympathy with the many friends I made there led me to take more time over it than perhaps I should have.

I’m pleased to say that after the fall of the Berlin Wall, I was personally able to help a number of my old contacts with the small amounts of capital needed to start up their own businesses and keep up contact with many of them even now. Sad to say some of my Yugoslav friends disappeared into the tragedy of the Civil War, though I still keep in touch with Slovenes who escaped the worst of it.

In those dark days in the 1980s conversations often turned to politics. Once we had carefully sounded each other out, it was a topic that could not be easily avoided. It was obvious that the system had failed, though no one I ever spoke to thought it would go and certainly not in the manner it did. I felt it had 10 years; they were generally far less sanguine.

Amusingly, one ambitious though politically very cynical Czech colleague, a cadre in a state trade organisation, believing it was the only way to get the promotion he desired, worked assiduously to get his party membership card – finally receiving it two weeks before Havel and Dubcek stood on the balcony in Wenceslaus Square!

What did we talk about? They talked about Democracy. They felt that it was the right to vote in free and fair elections that would bring about the society they craved and give their children the opportunities they felt they had been denied.

I talked about the rule of law. I tried to explain that democracy had serious flaws (a current example then being Mrs Thatcher), and that voting once every five years was not the most important part of freedom. It was, I explained, the Rule of Law. That laws applied as much to the state as they did to me. The state could not arbitrarily incarcerate me. It could not seek to conduct show trials or try me again and again for offences it could not prove. That law was not about worthless documents, but about rights as much as obligations and vigorously protected by an independent judiciary. I found myself singing the praises of the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, Habeas Corpus…

They were enchanted, if sometimes a little amused by my passion. Two went on to serve in their post-liberation parliaments.

But then 1997 and ‘New’ Labour came along.

Today, I fear, it would be me sitting in a dingy apartment talking about people being tried again and again. The possible abolition of trial by jury. Increasingly unlimited detention without trial. CCTV giving the state power to observe our very move. Powers the Stasi could only dream of. Rendition. ID cards with the frightening database being compiled by government behind them. And let’s not talk about the fraudulent electoral system. At least the old Communist governments pretended to get 98% of the vote. New Labour are happy to govern with no respect for dissent and opposition with the votes of a little over 20% of the people.

Now all we need is a failing economic system and I’d be right back in 1980s Eastern Europe!

* Martin Land is a Cambridgeshire Lib Dem activist and campaigner and blogs at New Model Army.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Terry Gilbert 14th Sep '09 - 7:24pm

    I spent time in Poland in the early 1990s, after the fall of the Wall. My overwhelming impression was less about civil liberties than economic ones. They were advertising on ambulances, so keen were they on capitalism. I understand the enthusiasm has now moderated somewhat. Though there were some aspects of the command economy I found useful – you paid according to the distance travelled on the train, for example – a return cost twice as much as single.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 30th Mar - 12:41am
    Peter Martin, the resolution foundation has published a short piece with ten recommendations for how economic policy can be approached in this crisis Safeguarding governments’...
  • User AvatarAndrĂ© Browne 29th Mar - 11:37pm
    I feel that we should have elected our leader in line with the planned schedule. The process of electing or leader will help us clarify...
  • User AvatarNigel Hardy 29th Mar - 11:26pm
    @James Belchamber "We should stand ready to work with Labour if they wake up out of their haze, but progress at this point is down...
  • User AvatarMark Pack 29th Mar - 11:18pm
    That is really helpful Sue; thanks.
  • User AvatarNigel Hardy 29th Mar - 10:35pm
    Presumably someone's having a joke. To lead a political party or local WI the ability to build alliances and have something to offer is essential....
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 29th Mar - 10:22pm
    @ Katharine, Yes the Resolution Foundation. I had a mental crosswire there!