The general election expected to be held in Canada next year will be a decisive one for the Lib Dem’s Canadian counterpart, the Liberal Party of Canada, as it faces the prospect of returning to office after more than eight years in the political wilderness.
With a recent poll showing the governing Conservatives trailing behind the Liberals, the party’s leader Justin Trudeau stands a good chance of becoming the first Canadian Liberal prime minister since 2006.
However, if Justin Trudeau hopes to be a successful prime minister and a progressive alternative to the incumbent Stephen Harper, he will need to demonstrate to Canadians that his administration will be a radically reforming one, prepared to take daring steps to make Canada a fairer society. For inspiration, Trudeau could look at the example of one past Liberal prime minister who took major steps to change Canadian society for the better: that of his father, Pierre Trudeau.
Holding the post of prime minister almost continuously from 1968 to 1984, Pierre Trudeau came to office with the promise of building a ‘Just Society’, a pledge that he went far in meeting during his time in office. More money was allocated towards shared-cost programmes for education, health, and welfare, and the welfare state was extended, with improvements in existing benefits (such as family allowances and pensions, which were indexed to cost of living increases ) and the introduction of new social programmes. Eligibility for family allowances was extended to children under the age of 18, special allowances were introduced for children under that age living in public institutions or foster homes, and a child tax credit was established. A Spouse’s Allowance was introduced for low-income surviving spouses between 60 and 65 years of age, while unemployment insurance coverage was widened. Social housing was also greatly expanded, and measures were undertaken to facilitate development in economically depressed parts of the country.
The Trudeau Government also introduced a broad range of socially liberal measures, as befitting a liberal administration. Capital punishment was ended, a liberal policy towards the intake of refugees was carried out, procedures for dual citizenship were liberalised, and the residency requirement for naturalisation was reduced from 5 to 3 years. A 1977 Human Rights Act guaranteed no discrimination against people on the basis of their sexuality, religion, sex, or race, while minority language rights were strengthened through measures such as bilingual positions in the federal civil service, the declaration of English and French as Canada’s two official languages, and the requirement of federal institutions to provide services in French or English to meet the needs of service users. In addition, equal rights were enshrined in a Charter of Rights and Freedoms established in 1982.
The reform record of Pierre Trudeau not only demonstrates the importance of liberalism in fostering social and economic development, but it also shows how a party with a clear vision of where it wishes to go in social policy can remain in office for a considerable period of time, enabling it to put its ideals into practice. This is a lesson that Justin Trudeau and the Liberals must remember if it wishes to win the next general election in Canada and usher in a new era of innovative social change.
* Vittorio Trevitt has written for Respublica, Democratic Audit, Catch 21, Fabian Society and Compass. He has also done voluntary work for the Labour Party, including campaigning on behalf of local candidates, carrying out research for speeches, and writing articles to raise awareness of important social issues. He believes in British socialists and liberals working together to achieve progressive ends, united by their commitment to equality, freedom, and justice.



6 Comments
Is there not a LESSON here for us, change your leader and you recover a lot of your support.
..If you can find one to change to, that is.
Otherwise, what’s the point?
For anyone wondering where I got the information for this article from, these are the sources that I used:
(1.) http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/06/18/trudeau_liberals_widen_lead_over_conservatives_new_poll_shows.html
(2.) http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/ipg/ipg-2010-4/lang.pdf
(3.) http://pm.gc.ca/eng/prime-minister/pierre-elliott-trudeau
(4.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=9XO1AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA130&dq=pierre+trudeau+1968+election+campaign+Just+Society&hl=en&sa=X&ei=4Y2sU9TENY-S7AbxzoH4Cg&ved=0CDkQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=pierre%20trudeau%201968%20election%20campaign%20Just%20Society&f=false
(5.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=U3oY17o5sSwC&pg=PT114&dq=pierre+trudeau+education+spending&hl=en&sa=X&ei=dZSsU5O6JJTe7AaAjoGYAg&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=pierre%20trudeau%20education%20spending&f=false
(6.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0pFYBSaxB_wC&pg=PA90&dq=pierre+trudeau+family+allowances&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3WusU8fYHauT0AXGmYCwBw&ved=0CEwQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=pierre%20trudeau%20family%20allowances&f=false
(7.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=HAG_WuuvZNkC&pg=PT85&dq=pierre+trudeau+family+allowances&hl=en&sa=X&ei=kWysU6PcEKWX0QXFyYGgCw&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=pierre%20trudeau%20family%20allowances&f=false
(8.) http://www.cwp-csp.ca/about-us/honorary-directors/
(9.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=F5Z0JZ8g1nQC&q=pierre+trudeau+spouses+allowance+1975&dq=pierre+trudeau+spouses+allowance+1975&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0m2sU4OCPLT70gXCyoHACw&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ
(10.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Sv-s53f5_wcC&pg=PA172&dq=pierre+trudeau+unemployment+insurance+extended+to+all+1971&hl=en&sa=X&ei=zIasU52FJsWS7Ab-vYGgBw&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=pierre%20trudeau%20unemployment%20insurance%20extended%20to%20all%201971&f=false
(11.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=aHemBXz1sZEC&pg=PT2&dq=canada+national+housing+act+1973&hl=en&sa=X&ei=dXmsU8XMHtTT7AbZrIDQCg&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAzgK#v=onepage&q=canada%20national%20housing%20act%201973&f=false
(12.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Sv-s53f5_wcC&pg=PA172&dq=pierre+trudeau+unemployment+insurance+extended+to+all+1971&hl=en&sa=X&ei=zIasU52FJsWS7Ab-vYGgBw&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=pierre%20trudeau%20unemployment%20insurance%20extended%20to%20all%201971&f=false
(13.) http://www.cbc.ca/archives/categories/society/crime-justice/the-death-penalty-debate/death-penalty-abolished-in-canada.html
(14.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=3cunbLlRR3cC&pg=PA110&dq=pierre+trudeau+immigration+act+1976+removes+restrictions+placed+on+immigration+of+people+with&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5HOsU-DYJpOV7Abj_YDgCw&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=pierre%20trudeau%20immigration%20act%201976%20removes%20restrictions%20placed%20on%20immigration%20of%20people%20with&f=false
(15.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=RVIoAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA210&dq=pierre+trudeau+human+rights+act+1977&hl=en&sa=X&ei=9XCsU-rjAcfZ0QWsqYDIBQ&ved=0CCMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=pierre%20trudeau%20human%20rights%20act%201977&f=false
(16.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=SAyizpsg-Z8C&pg=PA67&dq=pierre+trudeau+french+language+rights&hl=en&sa=X&ei=xnSsU8zRJM-v7AbfhIHICg&ved=0CFIQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=pierre%20trudeau%20french%20language%20rights&f=false
(17.) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Jp1Y5diwbcMC&pg=RA2-PT55&dq=pierre+trudeau+federal+institutions+required+customers&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ipOsU42LNIve7Aabt4DQDw&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=pierre%20trudeau%20federal%20institutions%20required%20customers&f=false
(18.) http://www.cbc.ca/history/EPISCONTENTSE1EP17CH2PA4LE.html
As much as I like Canada and the Canadian Liberals, drawing parallels to the historically dominant party in a 2-party system during the international highwater mark of liberal tendencies in Western politics, and the current travails of a third party in coalition during an era of austerity, has limited benefits.
Trudeau’s contemporaries included Kennedy, Martin Luther King, LBJ, Roy Jenkins; he was riding a wave of sentiment heading towards greater tolerance, internationalism and the desire to spread prosperity to all.
For us, the issue is how to swim against the tide, and where are we going whilst we’re doing it?
@Matt surely the point of the article is that Justin Trudeau is succeeding in re-inivigorating the Canadian Liberals after their disasterous polling under Michael Ignatieff’s leadership, by re-connecting with the social liberal traditions of his father’s tenure – there are some lessons for the UK’s liberal tradition here (and certainly for those liberals who would trash the welfare state and institutions that generation of liberals before them had built up)!
@James: I’d say the article illustrates that in the 1960s liberal-minded politicians in dominant parties in many Western countries believed that a measure of state intervention to enshrine social justice in their national societies was very compatible with measures to protect and promote individual rights and make the state’s role in law and order less restrictive to the individual and less based on imposing pre-existing moral assumptions across all of society.
(Of course, in our country, many of those politicians who managed to promote this point of view and get it into legislation, were from the Labour party – though not all.)
I would like the LibDems to maintain this perspective. I am glad that the Canadian Liberals are reconnecting with it.
But we should not casually assume that if a politician now does what Justin Trudeau has laudably done – redirect the policies of his party towards social justice as a liberal aim, freeing ot the individual, prepared to potentially accept measures of state intervention as contributory towards this – that politician will automatically get Pierre Trudeau’s success and glory. That sort of rhetoric is lazy politics.
But I think we should try.