Opinion: The opposite of a heated debate

For four years now I’ve steered clear of blogs and online forums. If you look at the kind of people who seem to spend their time posting at the bottom of the BBC websites, you’ll perhaps share my sense that those are the places where the freaks hang out.

I only started looking at this site a few days ago, but I haven’t see any of that sort of thing here yet. I’ve always thought that this party is where the calm and sensible debate is had. It doesn’t surprise me one bit that Nick Clegg did well in that style of forum. In this party he has had plenty of chance to practise the skill of rational and sane argument.

When you look at news websites, there seem to be a lot of party political activists commenting on stories incoherently. I have a suspicion that the majority work in Westminster but they hide behind strange internet personae.

As much as one can judge from the written word, their behaviour seems to be a mildly hebephrenic. It is the hysterical ranting associated with classic Hollywood madness. They wouldn’t get away with spouting the kind of nonsense they do in the hairdresser, the pub or in the office – and in the factory where I used to work in the East End they would have been ostracised.

The format of the editorial pieces I’ve been reading at Lib Dem Voice mean that substantive points can be made by people who have thought seriously about the issues involved, and their full effects. This is indicative of the kind of thoughtful people behind Liberal Democrat policy: myself as an engineer, and others in the party as academics, doctors, magistrates, leaders of our communities. We are not a party over-run by lawyers and spin-doctors.

We’ve debated our policies within the party. We still have real actual debates at our conferences with real people putting forwards their concerns, highlighting their interests, knowledge and experience.

Nothing gave me greater pride in my country or my party when I was able to stand up at Liberal Democrat conference and propose our first policy against Control Orders and 42-day detention as the law was passing through the House of Lords. I knew I was sticking up for for long-standing British freedoms and had the wherewithal to speak up for them.

The people in this party stick up for freedom. We put vested interests aside and debate things rationally. We are active listeners and sensible actors.

Whether I’m at work or in the pub, when the debate strays into politics, the Lib Dem argument tends to win. When you debate with a seasoned Liberal Democrat, expect to be challenged.

* Chris Lomax is a Liberal Democrat Member in Bermondsey & Old Southwark.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Malcolm Todd 22nd Apr '10 - 12:13am

    “hebephrenic”? “contumely”?!

    Ah, Lib Dem Voice. Where else? (Well, okay. Here. But it’s a short list, that’s all I’m saying.)

  • Chris Lomax 22nd Apr '10 - 2:03pm

    Jane, I think the key phrase you may have missed was “over-run by”. My father, who is a lawyer taught me to value everything in moderation. I think we can tolerate that in English, without the need to revert to the original Ancient Greek.

  • Malcolm Todd 22nd Apr '10 - 2:21pm

    “Mêden agan” — in case anyone was wondering… 8)

  • Douglas Dwyer 30th Apr '10 - 9:35am

    A brave party to allow me to say the following.

    Why does no one takethe following ideas on board.
    I would have voted for party that proposed any of the following.

    Create a Nationalised wholly owned bank to offer rates close to the Bank rate. (like the BBC provides competition for independent TV) then profits wont be available to overpay employees.

    A plan to increase em[ployment by supporting new manufacturing industries rather than only encouraging us to work stacking shelves with foreign produce.
    We should take advantage of an independent pound to devalue and hence increase the cost of imported product and simultaneously head off a run on the Pound and assist manufacturing and employment

    Doug Dwyer
    Devon.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tom Reeve
    You can talk about Gini coefficients and wealth and income per decile until you’re blue in the face. The core issue exercising most voters is fairness and pow...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Iain, There is common ground on the federal question insofar as we agree that it could work. A federal system works well in Australia. The Aus...
  • David Wright
    Conviction of lying under election law can be more consequential, though prison was not involved: "Convicted Reform politician no longer councillor" https://w...
  • Iain Donaldson
    Thanks Mim, That's fair as a description of the counting process, but I think it's worth separating the voter experience from the administrator experience. ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Kira, I don't think many, if anyone, are seriously suggesting that we should all be exactly equal regardless of the effort we might put in. The question...