Opinion: We must make the Care and Support Bill a reality

Much of the talk at the Autumn Conference in Brighton has rightly centred on the economy and we, in my opinion, are rightly sticking to Plan A and not being deviated towards Plan B or Plan V.

However, we as Liberal Democrats in government and on the ground have another area of policy in which we can make a significant and lasting change in this parliament. Social Care is not a sexy subject, it is not often at the forefront of people’s minds nor does it command a full chamber in parliament but it is vital to a liberal, fair and just society.

The Dilnot Commission and its subsequent recommendations provide a solution to one of the questions facing us on Social Care; capping the costs that those with assets have to pay for their residential care. But, the fundamental question still remains of who will pay for this and the ongoing gap in Social Care funding. The Treasury doesn’t want to commit to the almost £2bn needed to implement Dilnot. See ideological differences between the Tories and Liberal Democrats for further details!  The NHS Confederation says that the money cannot be found from the NHS. I believe the answer lies within both places. The NHS underspend could finance implementation of Dilnot and by deepening integration between  Health and Social Care services further, savings as well as service improvements can be realised.

Norman Lamb’s commitment to integration is clear and welcomed but it will require all of our Ministers and MP’s to speak loudly with one voice. We need to make the Care and Support Bill a reality in this parliament before the impetus is lost. We have the opportunity to bring a resolution to this issue which should be vitally important to us as Liberal Democrats, which is important to the thousands who need support and which is vital to establishing a fairer and more just society.

 

* Simon Allen is the Cabinet Member for Wellbeing on Bath and North East Somerset Council

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • David Rogers 30th Sep '12 - 10:54am

    “Norman Lamb’s commitment to integration is clear and welcomed but it will require all of our Ministers and MP’s to speak loudly with one voice”, as Simon rightly says above. This was reinforced in a number of conversations I had with him in Brighton last week.
    But we cannot simply leave the argument to Parliamentarians. Councillors up and down the country, of all parties, know only too well what pressures the current system is under, and understand the urgent need for reform. The LGA has set out how, on current trends and without reform, there will be little left for most other (universal) services by 2020. Health and Wellbeing Boards have the potential to drive the type of deepening integration locally which Simon also describes, but more is needed.
    In every community, there are not only ever greater numbers of older people with care and support needs, but also more and more families and others with a growing understanding of the harsh realities they face. It is up to us as Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners to lead the charge in next year’s county elections and otherwise, making the case for reform, and ensuring that this aspect of the Coalition Agreement is delivered.

    David Rogers is the Lib Dem Chair of the Local Government Association’s Community Wellbeing Board.

  • Patrick Coleman 30th Sep '12 - 8:20pm

    As someone approaching retirement,and making as much use as possible of the 40% tax relief on my AVC contributions – it seems sort of fair to cut this to 20% tax relief and thus help to pay for the Dilnot proposals which I (and others in my age group) are likely to benefit from in the future. Given that my company (Railways) scheme requires all current and future AVC contributions to be taken out as part of a tax free lump sum – I’d put just as much in if the relief was only 20%.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Craig Levene
    Militant tendency were a Trotskyist entriest organisation that gained control of a number of Clp's in the 80/90s & managed to get 3 MPs elected, & nearl...
  • Tim Rogers
    No problem with individual trades unionists donating to us but unions donating to us would be pounced on by the Tory press. We must not forget the voters who su...
  • David Le Grice
    Would trade unions even be willing to donate to us? To the extent they were able to tolerate Blair, Brown and Starmer it's largely been because of the Labours h...
  • Tristan Ward
    @ Jack Meredith SHOCK HORROR - Leader of Liberal Democrats (elected by the membership nomless) is a actually a liberal!...
  • Jack Meredith
    In response to Steve Trevethan: As much as I respect Sir Ed for his work on care and the charismatic enigma he is, I feel that he will never accept social de...