Opinion: Why Mike Tuffrey should be our candidate for Mayor of London

Over the weekend I started up a ‘draft Mike Tuffrey‘ page on Facebook to encourage Mike Tuffrey, one of our London Assembly members, to put his name forward as our candidate for the 2012 Mayor elections.

Imagining your fantasy perfect candidate is always fun (a cross between Paddy Ashdown and Shirley Williams perhaps?) but as the actual selection is nearing for its second attempt, I’m not won over by the likely choices on offer – and I think Mike has an awful lot to contribute.

Why Mike Tuffrey

As a long-standing member of the London Assembly, and the leader of our group 2006-2010, he’s got a huge knowledge of London’s issues and the track record in power of both Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson. He’s also regularly gone toe-to-toe with them at events such as Mayor’s Questions at City Hall – and frequently come out on top. He’s also consistently shown a passion for environmental issues which are crucial for London and important to so many Liberal Democrats.

Mike Tuffrey at the Thames Flood BarrierMoreover, one of the most important contributions our Mayor candidate can make is to lead the drive to get as many list candidates elected to the London Assembly as possible. The pressures on a Mayor candidate can – as I’ve seen up close in the three previous contests – make it extremely difficult for them to do keep that in mind. Mike Tuffrey’s background as an Assembly member would make it not only much easier for him to do that – but makes for an extremely plausible public pitch as to why he’d be talking about the importance of electing Liberal Democrats to the Assembly.

I said that I’m not won over by the likely choices on offer, so inevitably that means having reasons for preferring Mike to the other two names recently mentioned, Dominic Carman and Lembit Opik.

Dominic Carman

I really rate Dominic, and it was a pleasure to help with the artwork for his general election campaign in Barking. Being our candidate in Barnsley also was a service to the party for which he deserves many thanks.

I hope I’ll have the chance to help Dominic again on other elections in the future, but for this one I think Mike’s experience of London government and his role as an Assembly member gives him a strong advantage when you compare their CVs. Dominic himself a few hours ago decided to pull out from the race saying,

Given other commitments, I have reached the conclusion that I cannot financially afford to run an effective campaign as the Lib Dem candidate for Mayor. Regrettably, I will therefore not be putting my name forward when the selection procedure formally restarts in May. Having spoken to Mike Tuffrey and others yesterday, I am convinced that he will make an excellent candidate and I will be giving him my support in whatever way I can, should he decide to run, which I sincerely hope he does.

Lembit Opik

As for Lembit… there are plenty of views expressed about him, but I’ll add just two that matter particularly to me. I have happy memories of the support Lembit gave me as a new activist in the party, and in fact he arranged the very first TV interview I did. So when he talked about wanting to stand, I had an open mind – wanting to see if he would really put in the work around London to show that he has a hunger for the job, that he would be a hard-working candidate and to demonstrate with his personal commitment that the criticisms of him were misplaced.

But, but, but. I’ve on average spoken at a local Liberal Democrat event in London about once a fortnight since the general election, and as a result have chatted to many members across the capital and seen many lists advertising forthcoming events in different local parties. And the truth is that compared to the level of activity that someone working hard to win a selection could be putting in or someone who wants to show that he’s committed and working hard for a particular cause, Lembit’s been nearly invisible. The delay in running the selection for Mayor has even given Lembit a few extra months to put arguments against him to rest, but he hasn’t been making good use of that time.

My second reason for doubts is his voting record as an MP – in 2009 he was the only Lib Dem MP to vote against a measure to tighten up MPs’ expenses (requiring receipts for all expense claims), the only one to vote to keep the second homes allowance for outer London MPs and was also one of only four to oppose a tightening of the rules on declaring outside interests.

Lembit was also one of only three Lib Dem MPs to vote against the options for having a 100% elected House of Lords or an 80% elected one or a 60% elected one, and to vote in favour of the option for a 100% appointed one.

Iconclasm and going against the prevailing trends is often welcome. But on expenses and Parliamentary reform, despite his libertarian rhetoric, Lembit has put himself on the deeply traditional side of the fence too often for my liking.

So those are the reasons why overall Mike Tuffrey would be by far the best candidate of the three. Mike would be a great candidate both in his own right and when compared with the likely alternative.

If you agree, sign up on Facebook to help persuade him to throw his hat in the ring.

Note: The Voice has run pieces from Dominic Carman, setting out why he considered running to be the London Mayor candidate, and also from Lembit Opik’s team. Any candidate or would-be candidate is welcome to submit pieces.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in London and Op-eds.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Well it would be a good idea to get someone – they won’t win, but could perhaps avoid fourth place or worse!

    Like so much of the Clegg leadership, the Mayoral slection has been a shambles. There is a real possibility that the greens and or UKIP could poll better than the Lib Dems.

  • Matthew Huntbach 28th Mar '11 - 11:07am

    It would be sensible to make a virtue of not putting forward a “celebrity personality” as the Mayoral candidate. It is one of the things I hate about the Mayoral system that it pushes this sort of personality-oriented politics. It is daft to have a system which simultaneously places huge amounts of power into the hands of one person and chooses that person by a means which is bound to be a contest oriented around surface attributes rather than a contest of real skills for what is actually a fairly technical job.

  • I think that Mike Tuffrey would be a very sound choice. He’s used to debating with Livingstone and Johnson and has a clear understanding of London issues. I must declare an interest, having signed him up to the Durham University Liberals way back in 1978!

  • paul barker 28th Mar '11 - 9:02pm

    I have to make the same point as I made before about Carman. Tuffrey might well make a good Mayor but no-one outside The Party has heard of him & The Media wouldnt be interested. Whether we like The Mayoral System or not ( I dont) that the one we fight under & only ” Celebrities ” stand any chance of being listened to.

  • Why not start a ‘Draft Paddy’ campaign as well?

    No – really!

  • This post suggests that Mike should be the candidates, and was put up in the morning at 8.55. Within an hour another news had appeared which was apparently more interesting to LDV readers and generated more comments “Would an infinite number of monkeys be able to write an accurate story for the Telegraph?” As a result of this and other articles Mike’s potential candidacy was drowned out. If we put forward Mike as the candidate we will be drowned out in the same way at a London level and we will be ignored. This is dangerous as we could have problems with minor parties. The polls put us at 16% and we could do well if we carve out a distinct position and have a recognised candidate.

    I would personally campaign for whoever we select, within reason, and have campaigned with Mike in the 80’s when I lived in Lambeth. The problem is that Mike is standing down so people will ask why was he is standing down if he really wanted to be mayor. I don’t think that the voters will buy the idea that this was part of a game plan.

    Ed Joyce

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTom Harney 5th Jul - 4:04am
    The objectives discussed are not objectives for the party. They might be objectives for the country. We urgently need objectives for the party. What format...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 5th Jul - 2:06am
    Tony Blair has recently offered his thoughts on the future of progressive politics in the UK https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/12/tony-blair-s-speech-future-labour-and-progressive-politics-full-text “To win power, we need self-discipline not self-indulgence;...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 5th Jul - 12:07am
    @ George, ".....you don’t remember any of my counter-arguments." You could be right. At least I thought so because I genuinely can't! But, you've written...
  • User AvatarPeter Kenny 4th Jul - 11:39pm
    The Windrush scandal followed directly from the 2014 Immigration Act, supported by almost all MPs - only 7 voted against, none of them Lib Dem’s....
  • User AvatarPeter Kenny 4th Jul - 11:33pm
    The current benefit sanctions regime was introduced in 2012. You were in power as part of the coalition at the time. Callous, terrible heartless Tories?...
  • User AvatarJohn O 4th Jul - 11:24pm
    'John O: What student politics?' 'Commandeering the UK private health sector' That's apart from all the baggage