Terms of reference, questions to answer, how to submit your views and more – over on the party website.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Observations of an ex pat: Stormy Red Sea (Tom Arms)
-
By-Election Report 01.10.26 (Joe Nutt)
-
Picking our allies, a perspective on Israel/Palestine (Gillian Mosely)
-
Burnham is right to reform the triple lock; the Lib Dems should support it (James Hill)
-
Why I won’t Wayve goodbye to Black Cabs (Christian de Vartavan)
-
Exploring the history of old Tottenham with John Rogers
-
Some of the churches of Gower
-
Lib Dem MPs are talking to the media about their concern at the party's direction
-
Latest voting intention and leadership ratings opinion polls
-
Blackburn Reform councillor accused of farting at rival
-
State of Play: a classic BBC political drama revisited
-
Lib Dems make another by-election gain in Highlands
-
The Joy of Six 1585
-
Has Ed Davey got it wrong on the triple lock?
Recent Comments
Anthony Harris
Alex Macfie, electronic voting is a bad example. Over the past decade, 34-36 countries have used it to count around 4 billion ballots. We have the infrastructur...
cim
The big barrier to mass adoption of driverless cars isn't technological (not that the technology is easy) but legal. With a driver-controlled vehicle, liabil...
Mick Taylor
@PM LDV word limits do not always make it possible to say everything one might like! Yes, some people, myself included, have been able to make other provision...
Peter Davies
@Jana "Can I ask how you believe getting a mortgage and then paying it off ‘preferentially treated’? I do know that Mortgage Tax relief once existed but tha...
Mohammed Amin
I agree with James Hill. I found our Party Leadership's reaction disappointing, and am pleased that some MPs have already pushed back. I think Ed Davey has ...


2 Comments
I have copied the material from the party website that Mark refers to over to the members area where people can talk in private…
Mark Pack: Party reform commission: party publishes more detail … Terms of reference, questions to answer, how to submit your views and more – over on the party website.
Duncan Borrowman: “I have copied the material from the party website that Mark refers to over to the members area where people can talk in private…”
Not that I would be interested what’s discussed about party reform behind closed doors, but don’t you think it kind of diminish credibility to post here that “Lib Dems are ready to reform themselves, here’s some details” and then somebody posts a message that “now the members can retire to the closed cabinet to discuss the details in secrecy”? All right, I admit that nobody did say that the Lib Dems were becoming more open, but still, that didn’t sound very stylish to me.