Terms of reference, questions to answer, how to submit your views and more – over on the party website.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Mathew on Monday: “We need to be bold” (Mathew Hulbert)
-
As a party we must be better defined for the 2029 general election (Chris Bowers)
-
From national averages to local realities: inequality in our communities (Tom Walker)
-
We do have a two tier system, Part 2 (Neil Hickman)
-
A Federal Britain: 3. Fiscal Federalism and a complete constitutional settlement (Iain Donaldson)
-
Raising a flap about letterboxes
-
Arriving at one of East Finchley's ghost platforms
-
Matt Sanders selected by Lib Dems for South West Hertfordshire
-
In which D.H. Lawrence visits Snailbeach
-
Lib Dem energy guarantee would cut prices for all households
-
Chase Park fair photos
-
Green and Lib Dem Southwark brings government closer to voters
-
A swamp of lies and disinformation
-
The mysterious mole men of New York caught on video
-
Doing better? The goal must be Sufficeincy
Recent Comments
Nigel Jones
@Mick Taylor, I agree we must be concerned about income inequality in current circumstances, though overcoming this is about taxing the rich, better public serv...
Nigel Jones
@Mick Taylor, you are right to focus on strategy since we have plenty of policy, but i think we also need a vision and better messaging. It is easy to have stro...
Nigel Jones
The New Deal graphic is very helpful but of course not perfect. As to preventing Reform from winning, we need to be an anti-establishment party as Chris Bowers ...
Nigel Jones
It is certainly true that community politics is insufficient for long term gain. That was my experience in 13 yrs as a councillor and still active locally; at o...
Katharine Pindar
Splendid stuff, well done Yorkists! 'The New Deal' seems a great idea in itself. Your graphic shows, however, how much work will need to be done to assert ourse...


2 Comments
I have copied the material from the party website that Mark refers to over to the members area where people can talk in private…
Mark Pack: Party reform commission: party publishes more detail … Terms of reference, questions to answer, how to submit your views and more – over on the party website.
Duncan Borrowman: “I have copied the material from the party website that Mark refers to over to the members area where people can talk in private…”
Not that I would be interested what’s discussed about party reform behind closed doors, but don’t you think it kind of diminish credibility to post here that “Lib Dems are ready to reform themselves, here’s some details” and then somebody posts a message that “now the members can retire to the closed cabinet to discuss the details in secrecy”? All right, I admit that nobody did say that the Lib Dems were becoming more open, but still, that didn’t sound very stylish to me.