Terms of reference, questions to answer, how to submit your views and more – over on the party website.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
“Build, baby, build” but don’t lower our ambitions on affordability (Victor Chamberlain)
-
Twenty-six years of evidence on drugs. Twenty-six years of cowardice. (Tanya Park)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat: Gaza (Tom Arms)
-
The Lib Dem strategy review (Rob Blackie)
-
Are we doing enough to insure against climate change?
-
Don't mention the Isle of Wight Separatists' 1950s terror campaign
-
Fergus McClelland was the last illegal major British child actor
-
Labour and the Liberals in 1924 and today
-
Family: Scene Through the Eye of a Lens
-
Brexit: The Uncivil War - the TV drama with Benedict Cumberbatch
-
A power vacuum?
Recent Comments
peter Wigley
@Caractacus. Yes we need policies on all the things you mention but, we also need an easily recognisable identity: what is the party for? (Or maybe who is the p...
Margaret
It's a few years ago now, but I remember having a problem with a car we had hired in Alaska, and having a long argument with a call-handler somewhere in the 'lo...
Caracatus
The thing is we can have lower taxes (for most) and better public services. The madness of the lost war on drugs which cost billions. Sorting social care, th...
paul barker
Can London build its way out of this crisis ? Londons population has gone up by more than half since the 90s & all the "Plans" are for it to go up more. Lo...
Steve Nash
I agree with KP that the International Aid and diplomatic Budget should increased, to challenge both Immigration and the need for Defence. It may not be the ch...


2 Comments
I have copied the material from the party website that Mark refers to over to the members area where people can talk in private…
Mark Pack: Party reform commission: party publishes more detail … Terms of reference, questions to answer, how to submit your views and more – over on the party website.
Duncan Borrowman: “I have copied the material from the party website that Mark refers to over to the members area where people can talk in private…”
Not that I would be interested what’s discussed about party reform behind closed doors, but don’t you think it kind of diminish credibility to post here that “Lib Dems are ready to reform themselves, here’s some details” and then somebody posts a message that “now the members can retire to the closed cabinet to discuss the details in secrecy”? All right, I admit that nobody did say that the Lib Dems were becoming more open, but still, that didn’t sound very stylish to me.