PMQs: social housing and repossession

Cameron and Brown wrangle over the various parliamentary reform proposals. Cameron uses the election of two BNP MEPs to support his contention that a proportional system lets in extremists, and accuses Brown of only becoming interested in reform when he faces losing the next election. Brown looks somewhat less like a punchbag this week – that Monday night meeting of the parliamentary Labour party must have pepped him up a bit. In fact, his righteousness waxes so great that he proclaims Cameron “doesn’t deserve” to be Prime Minister.

Clegg asks about repossession rates, which he says the government is failing to slow, and the slow pace of social housing building programmes. Brown essentially replies – insofar as it’s possible to distil an essence from anything he says – that Clegg’s figures are wrong, and reels off a stack of statistics which don’t appear to relate precisely to the terms of Clegg’s question. They follow the usual Brown pattern – “We are shovelling money at it, therefore it is not a problem.” Clegg’s response is simple: if all that is true, why are there 70% more families waiting to be rehoused now than in 1997?

It’s a good point that deserved a bit more power behind it – as with many other problems supposedly right up their street, Labour have had twelve years to sort this problem out. A recession and the resultant housing problems has merely highlighted their failure to do so.

Clegg’s delivery was rather on the weak side today, although he is getting better at not getting tripped up by the hecklers. He got very heavy heckling from the Labour benches today – and no help from the speaker. It seems understood by all participants that as far as Martin is concerned, Clegg is on his own from now until Martin stands down.

In all, a rather wan PMQs following on from the fireworks from last week. Clegg, somewhat to my surprise has proven over the last couple of months that he actually excels at big, rude questions (viz, “Aren’t you a bit stupid?… At least I say it to his face!”) and broadbrush political ideology question (“The choice this country faces is between the Tories and the Liberal Democrats.”) Today’s questions would have been well used driving some wedges into the other two party’s positions on electoral reform.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Merlene Emerson
    Update on my post: It has transpired that the last issue of Apple Daily will be 2 days earlier on Thursday 24 June. The reason given was that it is for the sa...
  • Michael 1
    @David Raw I clearly said that I admire much that the Labour party and the Labour movement has done over the past 150-200 years. I am I believe on the left o...
  • Nigel Hunter
    Interesting that court cases are going the rounds re Johnson,s govnt plus a shock loss of a 'safe' seat. Equally interesting that this OBON comes along AND a p...
  • David Raw
    Good for, Daisy. Is it too much to hope she succeeds to the full post of Leader asap to revitalise and re-energise this party ? Johnson must think it's cleve...
  • Peter Roberts
    ".... and tub thumping" Now there's a thought and it sums up Boriss' Brexit Britain very well, do you think Chumbawuma would object?...