Richmond Lib Dems apologise for “liar liar pants on fire” website photo

The Hounslow Chronicle has the story:

The Liberal Democrat leader of Richmond Council has apologised after a photograph of a child swearing appeared on his party’s website.

The image was used following Serge Lourie’s decision to postpone the signing of a contract to develop Twickenham Riverside. It shows a young boy sticking up two fingers, alongside the caption ‘liar liar pants on fire’ and accompanies an article attacking the borough’s Conservative group and residents’ group Richmond United Group (RUG).

It claims they have spread lies about the controversial proposals, which include allowing developer Countryside to build 32 homes on the site of the former swimming pool in return for a community river centre. …

Cllr Lourie admitted using the image was “an unfortunate error of judgement”, adding: “It was taken down as soon as we realised there was something wrong,” he said. “The picture was commercially bought. I’ve had three complaints about it.

“I appreciate that we shouldn’t use anything like that but I stand by the article. The Conservatives and RUG have been spreading lies about the riverside and our intentions for the site. I am going to spend the next six months speaking to residents to explain correctly what is going to go on there, which is something that will be good for Twickenham that we could not achieve without the funding from a developer.”

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • nigel hunter
    I would not be surprised if the 'NEETS' are steered into the construction industries.There are many jobs in the field from labourer to architect. The social sti...
  • Peter Davies
    Dilnot did not propose a tax but a subsidy. That's how he convinced so many people that such an amazingly unfair proposal was acceptable....
  • Ruth Bright
    Agreed - I think people support it because it's there....
  • Tristan Ward
    @Peter Martin and Jana I think I’m with Jana on this one. The real test of a satisfactory level of income/resources should surely be an amount, taking tax...
  • paul barker
    I have found the Rebirth & Expansion of The Far-Right extremely depressing. We need to admit to ourselves that We, the whole of The Liberal/Progressive/Femi...