Roger Williams MP writes…Why I’m backing Tim Yeo’s Energy Bill amendments – and urging my colleagues to join me

It’s hard to believe, but more than a year has passed since Ed Davey stepped into Chris Huhne’s shoes at the Department of Energy and Climate Change.

Ed has spent much of that time fighting George Osborne and the Treasury to ensure that the Energy Bill – a once-in-a-generation opportunity to direct £110bn of investment towards a clean energy future – achieves its stated aims: cut carbon, secure our electricity supply, and rein in household fuel bills.

These are the aims of Liberal Democrats everywhere, and credit must be given to Ed for the vigour with he has pursued them. Credit too is due for his parallel achievements of securing £7.6bn for renewables to 2020 (a tripling of support), standing firm against George Osborne’s attempt to bring the wind industry to its knees, and getting the Green Deal off the ground. Not bad for year one.

But for all this, the defining test of the coalition Government’s stated aim to be the “greenest ever” lies in the Energy Bill. Osborne’s ‘Gas Strategy’ for 40 new gas power stations would pull the rug from under the Climate Change Act, but in contrast a decarbonisation target in the Energy Bill would set the conditions for a raft of clean energy investment, keeping us on course to meet our legally binding carbon targets.

The Committee on Climate Change’s letter to Ed on 25 February could not have been clearer: a decarbonisation target, set in 2014, is needed to drive the investment needed to help meet UK Climate Change Act targets. They are also clear that this is the most cost-effective way to deliver on our climate change goals.

More than 100 businesses and organisations – including Siemens, Vestas, ASDA, the Stop Climate Chaos Coalition, the Women’s Institute and the Church of England – agree.

Ed has spoken candidly of his desire to include a target, but the Government’s own amendments do nothing to bring it any closer. In fact as things stand, the only certainty is that no target can be set before 2016. There’s no obligation to set one at that point, nor for it to be based on CCC advice.

We can do better than that.

That’s why I’ve added my name to Tim Yeo’s Energy Bill amendments. Tim’s amendments echo the advice of the CCC, and are precisely in line with Liberal Democrat policy.

Seven Liberal Democrat colleagues have joined me in signing the amendment, while others have backed an EDM. Lib Dem president Tim Farron is supportive, and an emergency motion tabled at Spring Conference only narrowly missed being selected for debate. Even three Conservatives have signed up, with more waiting in the wings and ex-Energy Minister Charles Hendry understood to be supportive.

The momentum behind a decarbonisation target is palpable. Under questioning in committee, Ed said that the “vast majority” of businesses want one. He couldn’t name one company that opposes it.

Setting a target now, in the Bill, in line with CCC advice would be a profoundly sensible, necessary and Liberal Democrat act. It would boost jobs and growth in all our constituencies, and get us off the crippling gas hook that’s sending fuel bills through the roof.

I urge colleagues to add their name to Tim Yeo’s amendments and to vote in favour of them when the Bill comes back to the commons at report stage.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • alternative carbon free energy is a illusion cost to much not efficiant inpractical end of best pilling millions into shale gas

  • Anthony Hawkes 21st Mar '13 - 5:59pm

    I presume that all LibDem MP’s will vote for this amendment. A decarbonisation target is needed now to encourage investment of a real energy future.

  • Green energy means the energy sources we used in the Middle Ages. You can insist that people use them if you like, but it certainly won’t be cheap.

  • Steve Bradley 22nd Mar '13 - 1:10am

    Thanks for backing the amendment Roger !

    The Green Liberal Democrats submitted the emergency motion to conference urging all Lib Dems MP to sign Tim Yeo’s amendment, so we’re very pleased to see support for it continue to grow within the parliamentary party.

    To any other Lib Dem MPs reading this – please also sign up….! :o)


    Steve Bradley
    Chair – Green Liberal Democrats

  • Very encouraging to see people fighting for this. A decarbonisation target was always important to provide certainty for investors and bring jobs to the UK. George Osborne’s utter intransigence so far has made it even more important. It is vital that the Liberal Democrats, Labour Party and forward thinking Conservative backbenchers create their own coalition to defeat him.

  • Geoffrey Payne 22nd Mar '13 - 1:21pm

    There is really nothing more important. I cannot see a justification for a single Lib Dem MP to vote otherwise.

  • jenny barnes 24th Mar '13 - 8:55am

    “unless something is done to lower the cost of fuel.”
    May I suggest you google “peak oil”? Cheap oil is over. Cheap fossil fuel soon will be.
    The tourism thing is more likely because of general austerity, rather than the marginal cost of vehicle fuel; it would be good for fossil fuel usage to increase taxes on it. Look at the motorways – they are still running like conveyor belts . And there are plenty of people doing 80 + in their gas guzzlers.

  • Barry Greenwood 5th Apr '13 - 1:19pm

    It is depressing how few MPs have signed EDM 1065. Hardly any Conservative MPs have. This says all we need to know about David Cameron’s commitment to be “the greenest government ever.”
    So more power to Roger Williams’s elbow! Why haven’t ALL Lib Dem MPs signed it? What is their problem?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Nonconformistradical
    @Thelma Davies I don't have a problem with your views on parental responsibility. But what do you think should be done about children whose parents are irr...
  • Alex Macfie
    @Tristan Ward: Each country has its own political party system, which has evolved because of multiple factors of which the electoral system is only one. In some...
  • Thelma Davies
    @Nonconform. I'm stating that it's my responsibility & my husband's that my children were toilet trained & had basic reading and writing skills prior to...
  • Mary ReidMary Reid
    @Simon Atkinson - I am so pleased you like our musings on Max's impact within and beyond the party. And please accept my sympathies to the whole family for the ...
  • Chris Moore
    @ExLD Leeds: that's a ludicrous reason not to vote LD. Theakes is in a vanishingly tiny minority regarding the desirability of PR, as you must well know. LDs...