Two weeks ago Sky News’s political editor Adam Boulton launched a campaign to to get the leaders of Britain’s three main political parties to take part in a televised debate at the general election. Lib Dem Voice asked Adam to pitch his arguments in favour to our readers, and he gamely said yes…
Liberal Democrats know what it feels like. You’ve got a brilliant idea, it’s so obvious it just has to be right. But your competitors make patronising noises about your initiative, while trying to work how they can nick it for themselves.
That’s how I feel about Leaders’ Debates at the next General Election. Of course they should happen. Television is still the major mass medium of communication at a time when more and more people feel alienated from politicians – how could our political leaders possibly deny the public the chance to compare them face to face at election time?
And yet 49 years after the Kennedy-Nixon TV duel, Britain has still not caught up with what most countries around the world consider to be a natural part of any election: live debates. I’ve been contributing to attempts to stage debates for a quarter of a century. In the past they’ve always got bogged down as broadcasters and rival TV channels played off against each other – which often meant deliberately topedoing a debate plan if it wasn’t to your selfish advantage.
That’s why Sky News decided to cut the foreplay this election, and take advantage of reforms in the law, to declare that we will stage a debate at the next election. Nick Clegg has agreed to take part, so has David Cameron, Gordon Brown is thinking about it, and well over 10,000 people have signed our online petition. Following the Sky News initiative, the Economist says “Britain looks increasingly likely to hold its first televised debates among prime ministerial caindidates” and agrees it will be “good for the country”.
We are being as open as possible with the debate – it will be open to other channels including BBC and ITV to broadcast live and we will discuss the format with them. If there are several debates as a result of our challenge, the broadcasters will work together. We are consulting with the independent electoral organisations about our plans and are getting thumbs up.
Sky News has pledged to stage election debates in Scotland and Wales. We believe that the Leaders can set an example from the top, encouraging candidate debates in constituencies across the UK.
But only three people can possibly be Prime Minister after the next election. The choice will be made from the leaders of the Liberal Democrat, Labour and Conservative Parties – our main Britain-wide political movements.
The Leaders’ Debate will be both liberal and democratic, I hope Liberal Democrats will back our campaign.
15 Comments
“Lib Dems should back a Leaders’ Debate”
Dear Mr Adam… we DO!
The real question is, will you have the bottle to empty chair the Prime Minister if he (surprise surprise) thinks about it and decides not to?
There’s certainly no harm in it and the preparations sound good, but I’m not sure yet how useful it will really turn out to be. Are you having a studio audience? If so, I think there a slight risk it’ll turn into a mini PMQs – all very well, but we already know how they do at that.
I’d really like to see Channel 4’s FactCheck team employed live so that after every ad break the host can come back and tell us what bits of what the party leaders just said were lies 🙂
I’ve just tweeted Krishnan G-M with that idea 😀 You never know…
If the polls comtinue to look so bad for Labour when the electioin draws nigh Gordon could be persuaded to take part on the grounds he has nothing to lose. I do not see it happening otherwise. Much might depend on the format.. Be assured Adam we would welcome a Leaders’ Debate which includes Nick Clegg.
I am a bit puzzled by this. Every Lib Dem blogger except me has leapt at the idea of a leaders’ debate. He’s preaching to the choir.
You are totally right Adam, though if I recall correctly you were a bit patronising about the Alliance 25 years ago, at least in private…
Only if it’s proper debate and not a US style spin obesssed bore.
Andy, how would you ensure a “proper” debate?
Why should sky expect to host it?
Er, perhaps because they took the initiative and actually went and asked the leaders if they’d be on their show?
It is an excellent plan to promote the democratic benefit to our voters of showing a national TV debate between Brown,Cameron and our own Nick Clegg.
However,this event should be held on the BBC and potentallly SKY but the Chair ought to be Jeremy Paxman as he is a national institution.
Nick Clegg has unique oratory skills that closely rival Barack Obama and is able to handle complex questions with simple words that British voters will both understand and listen to and more importantly pledge public trust.
Nick Clegg has unique oratory skills that closely rival Barack Obama
Bahahahahaha. I mean, I like the guy and I think he comes off well in interviews and when speaking, but not even close, mate.
And Paxo? He just shouts at people these days, same with John Humphries – neither seem to quite get these days what the important questions are, they just savage interviewees. My vote’s for Jon Stewart off of the Daily Show 🙂
Or, now that I think about it properly, how about Jon Snow? He seems to actually be able to be polite to the people he interviews and can still try and cut through the crap when necessary.
I am no great fan of the Murdoch empire, but I would think that Sky/Adam have every right to say they want to do it if it is them pushing for it and them going out on a limb saying that they will broadcast it, even if a tub of lard takes the place of Gordon Brown.
2 Trackbacks
[…] BBC reports that Gordon Brown will accept the proposals, forcibly proposed by Sky’s Adam Boulton, for a leaders’ debate… but with only partial involvement for Nick Clegg: Months ago, […]
[…] the ante on a leaders’ debate, with Adam Boulton launching a full-throated campaign – including writing for LDV – for Nick Clegg, Gordon Brown and David Cameron to debate each other in the lead-up to […]