So who’s missing from the coverage of the #genderpaygap?

There’s someone missing in amongst all the coverage of the gender pay gap today.

It’s not entirely surprising that in 78% of companies men are paid more than women. However until recently, we didn’t have the evidence.

Thanks to a law passed in 2015, the facts have been laid bare. Companies have to face the uncomfortable truth about the disproportionate number of men in senior positions.

Much of the copious coverage of this today has missed something, though.

This crucial step forward was secured by none other than:

On  24th March 2015, Jo announced that she and Nick Clegg had worn the Tories down on this in the dying days of the Coalition. She wrote this article for LDV telling the story of how she did it.  Here’s that whole article:

In the final days of this Government Lib Dems are still delivering our agenda against the odds, and against Conservative obstruction.

Under the coalition government the gender pay gap had fallen to its lowest level, at just under 20% – but this is still 19.1% too high. Despite our high levels of women’s employment the UK has the 8th highest gender pay gap in the EU.

Not only is the gender pay gap socially wrong in modern society, but economically it’s nonsensical not to reward our most talented female employees properly. We should value the contribution of women and men in the workplace equally, so our goal has to be eliminating the pay gap completely.

As a Business Minister and Minister for Women, I have worked very hard to persuade my Coalition colleagues of the virtues of tough action to tackle this long-term inequality. Their traditional resistance makes it all the more remarkable that Nick Clegg has, in the last few weeks of our term, secured a government amendment that guarantees all large businesses will have to publish the difference between average pay for their male and female staff. So today (Tuesday) I will proudly vote for our party’s manifesto commitment – for large companies to publish the difference in average pay between male and female employees – to become law.

This is a significant win for women, and a political win for Liberal Democrats in Government. Amendments to the Small Business Bill, being debated in the House of Commons today (Tuesday), will fast-track our manifesto plans for gender pay transparency within the next 12 months. This will mean large companies – over 250 employees – will be legally required to publish the average pay of their male and female staff. It is our intention to create pressure from staff and customers to account for and close any pay gap that exists between men and women in large businesses. Women will know whether they are being properly rewarded for their endeavours: a situation that is good for competitive businesses and good for the economy.

As readers of Lib Dem Voice will know, we have argued for mandatory pay transparency since before the coalition was formed. We were the first major political party to commit to enforcing gender pay transparency by law. Labour might try to claim now that they would have done this in 2010 but actually their proposal was for voluntary publication for four years. This was something our champion for women, Lynne Featherstone objected to at the time – arguing against Labour’s delay that “pay audits are necessary and must be mandatory. We cannot wait another four years… voluntary pay audits are like waiting for Godot.”

In the wake of entrenched Conservative opposition, and in the context of Labour’s commitments while in government, we had to agree to try a voluntary approach first.  We did so only on the condition that the decision would remain under review, and if this approach did not lead to more companies publishing the difference in pay between men and women, mandatory reporting would be introduced for large companies. During our time in government just five companies have chosen to publish their gender pay gap voluntarily.  While I take my hat off to those who do – this is just not good enough.

Of course, the gender pay gap is not exactly an issue that the Conservative Party gets out of bed for. They were content to kick this issue into the long grass time and time again. Nick and I have made increasingly urgent appeals to our Conservative colleagues to address this. Which is why, today I am proud that we will go further than I expected. By securing a government amendment, Nick Clegg has successfully ensured that ministers on the government payroll will vote in favour of gender pay transparency, despite the Conservatives’ consistent efforts to block the proposals over the life of the coalition.

I could speculate about why the Tories have caved just weeks before the election – maybe the International Women’s Day celebrations caught the PM in a jovial mood? Or perhaps he feared that history (or the voters) would judge him for being on the wrong side of this argument.  It may be that with some help from the Liberal Democrats, he simply read the political runes and didn’t want to countenance any risk to the successful passage of the Small Business Bill as the firm deadline of Parliament’s dissolution approached. Liberal Democrats can be proud that we have been the drivers of reforms to modernise the workplace to give women a fairer chance to get to the top of the career ladder. By extending flexible working to all employees, introducing Shared Parental Leave and revolutionising childcare, we are ensuring that there is greater equality at home and at work.

We can also be proud that – thanks to our term of stability in government – there are more women in work than ever before and women’s gross weekly earnings have increased between 2013 and 2014. Additionally we have banned pay secrecy clauses and introduced mandatory pay audits for companies that lose equal pay claims. The Government is also committed to tackling occupational segregation, and the outdated view that certain jobs are for “men-only”. Only 13% of engineers in this country are women – substantially lower than other European countries like Latvia, Sweden and Bulgaria. Through initiatives like “Your Life” we are encouraging young girls to get into STEM-related careers.

We have achieved a lot, but there is still much more to do. Equal pay and better gender representation in business is good for the economy as well as helping to create a fairer society. So any future coalition that contains Liberal Democrats will ensure this remains front and centre of our efforts in government.

 

 

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Ruth Bright 5th Apr '18 - 10:12am

    Maddening! Kate Andrews has been given an open goal largely debating with people who are hopeless. No-one says this info tells us everything we need to know but it is a fantastic start. Fascinating how many voluntary sector organisations (loads of women but often in the cheap seats not the big roles) come out of this very badly.

  • To be honest, I’m finding much of the coverage to be pretty misleading. It’s a gender earnings gap rather than a gender pay gap.

  • It occurs to me that within my own extended family, in virtually every couple, the man has almost always worked longer or more unsocial hours than his partner, and consequently earned more even when his base pay was lower. I’m not totally convinced by proclamations that this is unfair.

  • One of my friends is CEO and General Manager of a small specialised engineering consulting firm that he founded. 10 employees. 8 full time engineers (6 male, 2 female) and 2 part time administrators (female). The reporting requirement doesn’t apply to small companies, but if it did, his company would have a huge gender pay gap because of the lack of female engineers in the workforce, and thus reflected in his company, and his administrative staff being female. He joked if he were required to report, and there was some sort of penalty for a gender pay gap, he said the best solution would be to fire the 2 female administrators and replace them with men. This would eliminate the “gender pay gap”, which would have the supporters of this legislation clapping with approval, unbeknown to them the fact that the “improvement” made women worse off.

    So beware championing bureaucracy. Liberals are usually circumspect about it, preferring to look at things on an individual level

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul Walter 20th Sep - 6:19pm
    I have now corrected the embedded video above so that it starts when Ian Kearns' speech starts. Apologies for the delay in doing this. Paul...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 20th Sep - 6:05pm
    @Ben Andrew "Your performance isn’t distilled into a single number based on a one-day test." I was struck by one of the very early changes...
  • User AvatarDavid Lloyd 20th Sep - 6:03pm
    English regions on a par with Scotland, Wales, NI? To me that represent a massive step backwards for the union. It would be like germany...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 20th Sep - 5:54pm
    Peter Martin, "But your aren’t going to solve these problems with “put a penny on income tax” thinking." The 1p on income tax is described...
  • User AvatarMichael Kilpatrick 20th Sep - 5:53pm
    Julian, thank you. The question of who is accountable for what is specific to what powers are devolved to the regions which is not necessarily...
  • User Avatartheakes 20th Sep - 5:50pm
    Mori Poll just out Lib Dems 13% (+3), taken 14th Sept to 18th Sept, over the conference.