Standing firm: defying Trump’s tariff war and protecting our allies

Yesterday morning, I woke up to the stark reality that Donald Trump has once again shot himself in the foot, imposing tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and potentially the European Union. This move is a clear sign that Britain, despite the naïve optimism of some on the far-right or within the Reform Party, will not be spared. In the long run, we too will face tariffs, and we risk becoming a client nation under Trump’s empire-like vision of America. Unfortunately for Trump, he seems to idolize the likes of Caligula, the Roman emperor who waged war against the sea. I’m surprised he hasn’t sent his armies to conquer the ocean yet.

Britain, the European Union, Canada, Australia, and other sovereign nations must now band together and stand firm against this kind of bullying. We cannot allow even an inch of European land to fall under the influence of American tariffs and policies. We must not let Canada, our steadfast ally, become the 51st state of the United States. We must empower our colleagues in Canada and stand by their side.

As free, sovereign countries that cherish liberal democracy, we do not undermine each other. We do not bow down to bullies. If Donald Trump and his supporters wish to shape America into a nation more tolerant of far-right ideologies, then so be it. But we will not be bullied by countries that, while influential, are taking a dangerous path.

Canada has always been a loyal ally. It stood with us in the great wars and after 9/11. It has fought and sacrificed, proving its strength and loyalty time and again. We must protect our allies and uphold the values we all cherish. Trump does not represent the entirety of America, and he will not be in power forever. But we must make our stance clear now, showing that we stand with our allies and for our principles.

We will not be bullied into submission. We will not let far-right fascism take root in our societies. If Trump wants a trade war, he will face not just Britain, but all of Europe, Canada, Australia, and other allies. We will stand united and see how far he is willing to go.

Trump, Putin, and Xi Jinping may share some similarities in their authoritarian tendencies, but we stand on the side of freedom and democracy. We must call out these dangerous ideologies for what they are and stand firm. If we do not, we risk losing everything that defines us as proud, sovereign nations.

Canada has a rich history, standing with us in times of need. We owe it to them and to ourselves to ensure that their sovereignty is never compromised. We must stand up now and show that we will not back down. A united front is our strongest defence against any form of authoritarianism.

* Mo Waqas is a vice chair of the Liberal Democrats' Racial Diversity Campaign and was the PPC for Middlesbrough and Thornaby East.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

11 Comments

  • Tristan Ward 3rd Feb '25 - 5:05pm

    Canada is more than a “loyal ally” It is a commonwealth country, and Charles III is its head of state as well as ours. It might be useful to ask Farage and the Conservatives to chose between Trump and the Commonwealth.

  • Nonconformistradical 3rd Feb '25 - 6:06pm

    ” It might be useful to ask Farage and the Conservatives to chose between Trump and the Commonwealth.”

    Yes – like it!

  • Ken Westmoreland 3rd Feb '25 - 6:29pm

    Indeed – what ever happened to the lofty talk of ‘CANZUK’, with closer ties between Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK post-Brexit?

  • Simon Horner 3rd Feb '25 - 7:37pm

    Trump’s desire to make Canada his 51st state – initially thought to be a ‘joke’ but looking increasingly serious every time he repeats it – must surely put paid to the idea of a state visit to the UK. It would be unconscionable for the British government to oblige the King of Canada to offer hospitality to a man who seeks to eradicate Canada from the list of sovereign countries.

  • Daniel Walker 4th Feb '25 - 8:37am

    @Simon Horner It would be unconscionable for the British government to oblige the King of Canada to offer hospitality to a man who seeks to eradicate Canada from the list of sovereign countries.

    Technically, as I understand it, the King of Canada and the King of the UK are separate legal entities that happen to both be the same person. A bit uncomfortable for him if His Majesty’s governments of Canada and the UK ask him to do conflicting things….

  • David Garlick 4th Feb '25 - 9:31am

    4 more years. Who knows what DT is really thinking.

    The detail might change, might be mieleading but total domination is the goal.

    Be patient. Be self interested when it comes to the USA.

    Taking USA products off of the shelves… I like it.

  • Time to tip the Napa Valley wine down the sink. And why is it impossible to get Canadian wine in the uk, in particular the delicious Niagara Riesling?

  • John McHugo 4th Feb '25 - 6:35pm

    Something that irritated me profoundly during Trump’s first term was his trip to Blenheim Palace (the birthplace of Winston Churchill) for a state dinner with the Queen. Remember? He kept Her Majesty waiting and humiliated Theresa May in the process. I’m sure it was just his usual tactic of showing how important he is. Then his helicopter finally hove into sight, reminding me of the film ‘Apocalypse Now’.

    I’m sure I was not the only one incensed by this at the time. Starmer cannot refer to this kind of episode now because of the responsibilities of his position as prime minister, but we can.

    There is a rich seam of British patriotism for us to be tap into here. Farage and the hapless Tories have snookered themselves. It’s not just a question of choosing between Trump and the Commonwealth (@Tristram Ward). Those guys and girls want Britain to be the 51st or 562nd state of the Union and George Orwell’s Airstrip One. Shout it from the rooftops!

  • Peter Martin 9th Feb '25 - 2:14pm

    There can’t be any doubt that Trump is anything other than a mouthpiece for the big US corporations and billionaires. Tariffs aren’t about saving jobs for US workers. They are about increasing the profits of Musk, Zuckerberg and Bezos.

    I do hope that our usually over compliant Labour Govt (at when it come to standing up against Big Business) will be more forceful with Trump on the tariffs issue. The UK is not a mercantilistic net exporter. There is no argument for tariffs.

    The issue is solely about taxes paid by US corporations in the UK. They choose to operate here – presumably because they can make decent profits. Why do they think they need any special deals?

    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/tax-cuts-musk-zuckerberg-bezos-trump-tariffs-deal-3524631

  • Given the pronouncements of the last couple of days, it would seem a suitable response to the US with respect to protecting our allies is to announce and take moves to give prefer to our non-US allies in our defence spending. Michael Heseltine was right to defend Westland…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Raw
    @ Tom Bailey Given that Ms Ursula von der Leyen is a Lutheran not a Catholic you seem to have a vivid imagination....
  • Jenny Barnes
    Matt " I believe the only way forward on this as it is on on social issues, is rational, persuasive, constant debate and dialogue – of course, based on respec...
  • Tom Bailey
    Daniel Walker, I'm fully aware of how the EU elective system works, and the point is that European voters are not allowed any direct access to that process. [ p...
  • Gill Travers
    Charlotte Cane “Will the Minister consider changing the law so that the Equality Act lives up to its name?” is a valid contribution. Things have moved on si...
  • Alison Howarth
    @ Kira Collins So you think that a trans man should be treated as the biological woman they are and given pregnancy and maternity protections? That sounds very ...